Prior to 2017, the sale of units in under-construction projects in India was governed by applicable state laws with no central regulator. A common grievances of the homebuyers was delay in possession; or flats not being in accordance with agreed parameters when delivered. Thus, they would typically approach civil courts or consumer fora under the Consumer Protection Act 1986 (CP Act) for appropriate relief.
Thereafter, the Central Government notified the Real Estate (Regulation & Development) Act 2016 (Act) providing homebuyers a specific redressal forum for legal remedies. The Act, however, did not specifically exclude the jurisdiction of consumer forums established under the CP Act. As a result, homebuyers were unsure whether they could approach the consumer forums for any dispute with developers.
However, as NCDRC is a quasi-judicial authority and not a civil court, the Act does not impose any bar on its jurisdiction to hear matters of disgruntled allottees in a real-estate project and that the same is further clear from Section 88 of RERA, which provides that the Act shall be read in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law in force for the time being. Thus, as long as the powers of NCDRC under the CP Act are not contrary to the powers of the RERA Authority, the two shall co-exist and are not mutually exclusive remedies. Further, it held that the remedy available to an allottee under Section 18 of RERA is without prejudice to any other remedy available to him. In light of this judgment, homebuyers are at liberty to choose the appropriate forum to put forth their claims.
Thus, the Supreme Court has put a long-debated issue at rest. Now, it is up to homebuyers to decide which forum is the most effective to address their issues. To help answer this question, let’s examine the objectives and purposes of both legislations.
Any aggrieved person may file a complaint with the RERA Authority for a violation or contravention of the provisions of the Act by a promoter. The remedy under Section 31 of the Act shall also extend to an allottee seeking remedy against a defaulting promoter for refund of monies or payment of interest on monies already advanced.
With regard to the relief to be granted to aggrieved homebuyers/consumers, an order may be passed by NCDRC directing the developer to refund the amounts paid along with compensation for any loss or damage because of the negligence of the builder or developer. The power to grant punitive damages also lies with the NCDRC.
Therefore, while homebuyers are at liberty to choose between the RERA Authority or NCDRC, they must first analyse the nature and complexity of their cases, and the ultimate relief they seek. Last, the quantum of damages and monetary claim of the homebuyer would also influence the decision.
About the author: Vineet Nalawalla, Partner – Real Estate, Veritas Legal, is a qualified Solicitor with over a decade of experience. Over the years, Vineet has advised and assisted various domestic and foreign clients on several real estate transactions, regulatory issues such as CRZ regulations, stamp duty and registration.