The court found that MGF failed to substantiate its ownership claims with sufficient evidence. It also noted that the constructions by M3M and the others were carried out after obtaining the necessary permissions from the relevant authorities, thereby invalidating MGF?s encroachment allegations.

In its ruling, the court emphasised the importance of adhering to due legal processes and the necessity for claimants to provide clear, irrefutable evidence when asserting property rights. The judgement also highlighted the need for developers and landowners to ensure their operations comply with all legal requirements to avoid similar disputes.

The court?s decision is a significant win for M3M and the other defendants, reinforcing their right to develop the land. It also sets a precedent for future land dispute cases in the region, underscoring the judiciary's stance on baseless claims and the importance of legal compliance in property development.

The ruling is expected to impact the local real estate market, encouraging developers to be more diligent in securing their legal positions and obtaining the required permissions before undertaking construction projects. This case serves as a reminder of the legal complexities in the real estate sector and the critical need for thorough documentation and adherence to regulatory standards.