Transworld Shipping Posts Lower Q2 Earnings Amid Market Volatility
Industry Environment The global shipping sector delivered a mixed performance in Q2 FY26, with container freight markets remaining fragile despite temporary rate improvements on transpacific routes driven by higher US import volumes and port congestion in East Asia. Geopolitical tensions, fluctuating consumer demand and macroeconomic uncertainties—particularly in the United States—continued to pressure freight rates.
The Shanghai Containerised Freight Index (SCFI) stood at 1,319.34 points in mid-September 2025, an 8.1 per cent decline from the previous period, as oversupply and weak European demand suppressed global container rates. By contrast, India’s coastal container trade remained comparatively resilient on the back of domestic consumption and policy support.
Dry bulk movement showed strength, with the Baltic Handysize Index (BHSI) rising from 690 to 856 points, supported by tight vessel supply and increased bulk demand along India’s eastern and western coasts.
Operations Overview Transworld’s fleet currently consists of 12 vessels—10 container feeder vessels and 2 dry handy-size bulk carriers. All container vessels continue to operate on charter with Avana Logistek Limited. The bulk carriers remain deployed in global markets, positioning charter hire income as the company’s primary revenue source.
A significant operational challenge stems from four container vessels approaching 30 years of age, requiring intensive maintenance, higher operating costs and scheduled lay-ups for technical compliance—leading to reduced operating days.
The company is evaluating replacement options; however, a limited supply of suitable vessels and elevated market prices have made acquisitions commercially unviable. The management noted that replacing ageing tonnage will require substantial equity, and discussions are ongoing to secure feasible options.
Financial Performance
Q2 FY26 vs Q2 FY25 (Consolidated)
Revenue: Rs 980 million vs Rs 1.25 billion
EBITDA: Rs 180 million vs Rs 500 million
Profit Before Tax: Loss of Rs 90 million vs profit of Rs 220 million
Profit After Tax: Loss of Rs 90 million vs profit of Rs 210 million
EPS: Rs (4.17) vs Rs 9.69
Q2 FY26 vs Q1 FY26 (Consolidated)
Revenue: Rs 980 million vs Rs 950 million
EBITDA: Rs 180 million vs Rs 210 million
Profit Before Tax: Loss of Rs 90 million vs loss of Rs 70 million
Profit After Tax: Loss of Rs 90 million vs loss of Rs 80 million
EPS: Rs (4.17) vs Rs (3.56)
The company attributed the decline in profitability to weaker charter rates, lower operating days for ageing vessels and increased maintenance expenditure.
Despite the challenging environment, Transworld emphasised its ongoing efforts to enhance fleet readiness, improve operational efficiency and explore viable vessel acquisition opportunities to strengthen future performance.