Plenty of new and expansion projects are on the anvil in India’s metro-rail sector. We list a few proposed big-ticket expansions:
Plans to introduce 70-100 km of metro lines per year over the next decade or so are likely to sustain rail designers, metro contractors and suppliers and sub-suppliers of metro systems, observes Harsh Dhingra, Management Consultant, Rail and Metro. “Opportunities will also arise for private players to lease systems and subsystems and train operations and this will improve overall efficiency. The prevailing shortage of technically qualified and trained personnel (see box on challenges) is an opportunity to introduce more rail-based syllabi in technical universities and ITIs as well as private institutes to train more people.”
“We are actively pursuing underground metro opportunities in India and Bangladesh,” says Raman Kapil, Executive Vice President & BU Head - Metros, Tunnels & Environment, Tata Projects. “We’re focusing on underground opportunities mainly for our own expertise and because most of these projects are funded by multilateral agencies. We successfully completed the Lucknow Metro in 2017 and are currently executing the Pune and Chennai underground metros.”
“We are looking to get involved with metro projects in Ahmedabad, Jaipur, Kanpur, Patna and Varanasi,” says Rambabu Sabbineni, Vice President, P&M, JMC Projects (India). “These may be both overground as well as underground metro construction projects.”
“With metro rail projects worth Rs 2 trillion at the approval stage, we’re looking forward to new metro, light-rail metro and Metro Neo projects on similar lines as the present general consultancy, proof checking and detailed design consultancy projects we have in hand for metros in more than eight cities,” says Vishwas Jain, Managing Director, Consulting Engineers Group. “Our work has included design, proof checking, project management and general consultancy for civil, systems and operations and maintenance (O&M), for elevated as well as underground sections, including depots.”
The private sector doesn’t find the PPP model for transit projects attractive owing to the high capex, high cost of borrowing and controls on passenger tariff, opines Dr G V R Raju, Senior Vice President, Global Transportation, Europe & India, AECOM. To tide over this funding challenge, Dhingra expects the PPP model to align with the expectations of all stakeholders; this will see private equity being used to establish metro systems.
Speaking of the key drivers of public transit in future, Dr Raju lists the hybrid working culture, Gen Z’s penchant for shared services and the growth of satellite townships around major cities. He expects connected autonomous vehicles (CAVs) to provide seamless connectivity between residential, commercial and recreational areas of the city.
Coming to the influx of new technologies, with hydrogen fuelled trains being tested, Sunil Srivastava, Managing Director, Balaji Railroad Systems, believes it is possible that “not too far in the future, we may also see urban transit systems running on hydrogen or solar power.”
Mohammad Wamiq, Senior Architect (Infrastructure), GPM Architects & Planners, sees the scope for transit-oriented development to add value to India’s metro-enabled cities. Transit-oriented development in urban spaces maximises the amount of residential, commercial and leisure space within walking distance of public transport. In Hong Kong, for instance, he points out that approximately 41 per cent of the population lives within 500 m of a metro station.
The Metro Rail Policy 2017 mandates transit-oriented development for metro projects, which will be challenging to implement in Indian cities.Wamiq continues, “But taking the example of Ahmedabad’s new city master plan, smaller steps towards this aim can be taken and opportunities will arise. We look forward to delivering our services for transit-oriented developments to further India’s socioeconomic development.”
With the world seeing a prominent shift from stations to multimodal transport hubs, Wamiq also sees the design needs of stations changing in future.
“Global experience shows that most metro systems are in a continuous expansion mode mainly because cities don’t stop expanding and, as a consequence, there is always a need for a good public transit system to meet the growing needs of the citizens,” says Srivastava. “Any metro system cannot be a one-off activity; planned expansion is a must to keep pace with the growth of the city. In fact, I would say that if a metro system is not being expanded, the city didn’t need a metro system in the first place.”
Conceptually, the train design is now trending towards a three-coach/six-coach option for 25 kv catenary power supply (as in Delhi/Mumbai) and a three-coach option for third rail 750 v (Kolkata/Ahmedabad/Bengaluru) from the previous three, four, six and eight-car options, says Dhingra.
To put this evolution in perspective, Surjit S Madan, Director (Planning), Personal Rapid Transit System, AtriyaAbundense, says, “Standardising the rolling stock to a three-car design expandable to a six-car design would meet a peak passenger requirement initially of about 20,000 passenger per hour per direction traffic (PHPDT) with 180 seconds headway and eight passengers per sq m standing occupancy, and then double this, for an overall capacity of 800,000 passengers in both directions per day, for a nearly 20-km -long system.”
“The use of communication-based train control (CBTC) with automatic train protection (ATP) and automatic train operation (ATO) for signalling, is now becoming a standard feature in all metros,” adds Dhingra. “With this, the operator will be able to run trains with a one-minute frequency as against the three to six-minute frequency norm for peak periods with conventional signalling.”
With CBTC signalling, a six-car train would have a passenger capacity of 60,000 PHPDT with a 120-second headway, thus catering to 1,200,000 passengers in both directions, sufficient capacity for a city inhabited by over 5 million people, points out Madan. “With CBTC signalling and driverless operations, shorter trains can be adopted in metro cities or the headways can be further reduced to 90 seconds or lower to increase passenger capacity.”
Adopting a standard gauge (1,435mm) track on most metros as opposed to Delhi Metro’s early broad gauge (1,676mm) track aligns Indian metros with most metros globally, continues Madan. “Shifting from the 25kVAC traction power supply adopted in the Delhi Metro to 750V DC traction to reduce the rolling stock’s axle load by 1 tonne for better energy-efficiency and lower maintenance cost has also reduced the civil construction cost for elevated metros.”
“Standardisation is associated with a significant design reuse, up to 85 per cent notwithstanding inflation, which, in turn, reduces or stabilises the cost of the train and the signalling system, elements accounting for around 30 percent of the cost of the metro,” explains Dhingra.
Considering that having a metro system is on some level a status symbol for a state/city, reflecting the local environment also sometimes becomes a design priority, for which architects look to local culture and heritage and major landmarks that the metro route passes through, he adds. “For example, the interiors of stations in Chengdu, China, are based on forms and patterns found in nature and influenced by the local tradition of silk-weaving as well as the flora and fauna found in surrounding parks. In India, the Pune Metropolitan Region Development Authority is following the example of the Maha-Metro in designing metro stations that reflect the local culture.”
So now that the Government is recommending the use of rail-based urban transport systems in cities with a population of 3 million and above, subject to commercial viability, what route should those cities follow?
“If Tier-2 and Tier-3 cities with a population of less than 5 million in the next 30 years adopt the standard rolling stock configuration, they will end up with oversized metros to begin with that continue to be unsustainable due to a higher capital cost and a higher operating cost throughout their lifespan,” observes Surjit S Madan, Director (Planning), Personal Rapid Transit System, AtriyaAbundense.
Consequently, “in terms of the overall metro design, the Metrolite and Metro Neo are two technologies that are seriously being considered for implementation in various Tier-2 cities over the conventional heavy metro due to their lower capital as well as operating costs,” says Srivastava.
The single-vehicle Metrolite is a modern tram system without exclusive RoW, with a 300-passenger capacity for a 33-m-long single articulated vehicle of three to five cars, and a 180-second headway at best because of mixing with road traffic at junctions, explains Madan.
Metrolites or light rail transit (LRT) systems have been successfully running for several years in various parts of the world, points out Srivastava. “And these systems as also light metro cars, automatic people movers, monorail systems, etc, can impact the cost of constructing a metro system upto 20 per cent,” adds Harsh Dhingra, Management Consultant, Rail and Metro.
Also, LRT systems are the future for clean and efficient public transport, says Srivastava, who believes that the Metrolite could also be considered for future expansion in cities with existing metros, albeit with appropriate interchange arrangements.
Having seen larger cities implement metro rail systems with a 20,000-50,000 PHPDT capacity, costing from Rs 250 crore/route km for elevated sections to over Rs 500crore/route km for underground sections, some cities are now considering alternatives such as the Metro Neo and Metrolite with a capacity of 5,000 to 25,000 PHPDT, costing anywhere between Rs 30 crore/km to Rs 170 crore/km, observes Dr G V R Raju, Senior Vice President, Global Transportation, Europe & India, AECOM. “Cities are looking for the right solution for their current and future needs vis-à-vis the capex involved. The key challenge is the selection of the right single or mix of systems with sustainability and decarbonisation in mind. The cost and viability for last-mile connectivity is still a challenge in many cities with a sufficiently advanced metro network.”
The disadvantage of the Metrolite is its low capacity. A 33-m-long vehicle offers a 6,000 PHPDT while a 45m-long vehicle offers 8,500 PHPDT. Even if two vehicles were coupled, the capacity would be way below the three-car and six-car train 30,000 to 60,000 PHPDT capacity, respectively, says Madan.
To bridge this gap and offer a sustainable solution that cuts the capex and opex by 25 per cent, the Andhra Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has developed a specification for a driverless light metro, continues Madan. “Rolling stock would have a lower axle load of 12 tonne against the present 15/16 tonne with DC/AC traction, respectively. Its configuration would be two-car to start with, expandable to three-car or four-car (even five or six car), with the four-car achieving a 24,000 PHPDT capacity with a 120-second headway and six persons per sq m.”