Architecture should not try to make beautiful buildings, but correct buildings
Real Estate

Architecture should not try to make beautiful buildings, but correct buildings

Dr David Fisher, Founder & Chairman, Dynamic Architecture
I practiced architecture in Florence, in what we believe is the city of art. Later in my career, I went to New York City and found that the towers of New York were built in the same way that we built towers in the middle ages. One big difference is that the towers we built are still up over 800 years. The towers built in New York and elsewhere are designed for just 40 years and would not live much more. To make sure they did, I started to develop the technology of construction. 

Some people think it is a crazy idea of skyscrapers in motion but I thought it was the right time to bring to these buildings what is called sustainability and preferred locations. These are dynamic buildings. What is dynamic architecture about? The big impact, of course, is because of motion, but in a way this is not the most important thing. It is not about the physical shape of the building designed, but the result of the motion. All the floors are exactly the same, no skyscraper can be more simple to build and faster to build, and in most cities less expensive than a normal skyscraper because all the floors are exactly the same and are all produced off site. We believe dynamic buildings are an era of logic architecture. It is not the beauty, it is not the shape of the building, it is the logic. 

I believe architecture is not the sculpture, it is first of all feasibility—how much did it cost to build and how much is the value after being built. The second commandment of architecture is the functionality, the specs of the building. The third is technology: the engineering and aspects of engineering. Then sustainability, and the extremely important issue of maintenance. The last thing is the design. That is important but it has to be a result of logic, not a target. 

I believe architecture should not try to make beautiful buildings but correct buildings. In fact, this is my philosophy: Correct is beautiful but beautiful is not always correct. So design is a result of technology. Take, for instance, the Eiffel Tower: Eiffel was an engineer, he was not even an architect; the shape of the tower is a result of structured engineering, a concord piece of art. He did not even spend one penny to make it look so sexy. Another good example is of the dome of the cathedral of Florence. The task of Filippo Brunelleschi about six centuries ago was not to build a nice dome but to build the biggest dome ever built in history. He was not an architect according to today’s concept of architecture; he was an engineer. Maybe not even an engineer, he was a builder and this structure has been here for 600 years. So, beauty is the result of engineering, the result of technology. This is one of the dynamic buildings—the core is complete while all the floors around the core are completely prefabricated and made of steel. 

There are three basic innovations: The motion, so the building is on check continuously and the building change is perfect continuously; green, so the building produces green energy from wind and sun; and the construction, which is mainly the most important. 

All the technologies exist, but they never came to buildings. Industrialisation, I believe, is the future. Dynamic buildings start prefabrication with endless advantages. This is the future, in my opinion. 

I was asked to speak about dynamic architecture in India and the connection between dynamic cost and low-cost housing. So what is the connection? Industrialisation! In fact, we now have the massive work of developing low-cost housing in this country. And one of the few patents has just been registered a day before we speak to build low-cost housing in India, for the first time. I took the idea from cruise ships. It can be built fast and with relatively low cost because it is built off site, not on a construction site. So this is a building for me that is floating with thousands of people and the building is constructed in such a short time; this is the opening to low-cost buildings. The housing issue in India is evident and with the vision of Housing for All, we hope we can bring, through this luxury rotating skyscraper, a contribution to affordable homes as well in India.

Dr David Fisher, Founder & Chairman, Dynamic ArchitectureI practiced architecture in Florence, in what we believe is the city of art. Later in my career, I went to New York City and found that the towers of New York were built in the same way that we built towers in the middle ages. One big difference is that the towers we built are still up over 800 years. The towers built in New York and elsewhere are designed for just 40 years and would not live much more. To make sure they did, I started to develop the technology of construction. Some people think it is a crazy idea of skyscrapers in motion but I thought it was the right time to bring to these buildings what is called sustainability and preferred locations. These are dynamic buildings. What is dynamic architecture about? The big impact, of course, is because of motion, but in a way this is not the most important thing. It is not about the physical shape of the building designed, but the result of the motion. All the floors are exactly the same, no skyscraper can be more simple to build and faster to build, and in most cities less expensive than a normal skyscraper because all the floors are exactly the same and are all produced off site. We believe dynamic buildings are an era of logic architecture. It is not the beauty, it is not the shape of the building, it is the logic. I believe architecture is not the sculpture, it is first of all feasibility—how much did it cost to build and how much is the value after being built. The second commandment of architecture is the functionality, the specs of the building. The third is technology: the engineering and aspects of engineering. Then sustainability, and the extremely important issue of maintenance. The last thing is the design. That is important but it has to be a result of logic, not a target. I believe architecture should not try to make beautiful buildings but correct buildings. In fact, this is my philosophy: Correct is beautiful but beautiful is not always correct. So design is a result of technology. Take, for instance, the Eiffel Tower: Eiffel was an engineer, he was not even an architect; the shape of the tower is a result of structured engineering, a concord piece of art. He did not even spend one penny to make it look so sexy. Another good example is of the dome of the cathedral of Florence. The task of Filippo Brunelleschi about six centuries ago was not to build a nice dome but to build the biggest dome ever built in history. He was not an architect according to today’s concept of architecture; he was an engineer. Maybe not even an engineer, he was a builder and this structure has been here for 600 years. So, beauty is the result of engineering, the result of technology. This is one of the dynamic buildings—the core is complete while all the floors around the core are completely prefabricated and made of steel. There are three basic innovations: The motion, so the building is on check continuously and the building change is perfect continuously; green, so the building produces green energy from wind and sun; and the construction, which is mainly the most important. All the technologies exist, but they never came to buildings. Industrialisation, I believe, is the future. Dynamic buildings start prefabrication with endless advantages. This is the future, in my opinion. I was asked to speak about dynamic architecture in India and the connection between dynamic cost and low-cost housing. So what is the connection? Industrialisation! In fact, we now have the massive work of developing low-cost housing in this country. And one of the few patents has just been registered a day before we speak to build low-cost housing in India, for the first time. I took the idea from cruise ships. It can be built fast and with relatively low cost because it is built off site, not on a construction site. So this is a building for me that is floating with thousands of people and the building is constructed in such a short time; this is the opening to low-cost buildings. The housing issue in India is evident and with the vision of Housing for All, we hope we can bring, through this luxury rotating skyscraper, a contribution to affordable homes as well in India.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Asian Energy Services Q1 FY27 PAT Rises 129 Per Cent

Asian Energy Services Limited reported a 129 per cent year-on-year rise in net profit to Rs 128 million for Q1 FY27, compared with the corresponding quarter last year.Revenue increased 135 per cent year-on-year to Rs 2.71 billion, supported by continued momentum across its services business, disciplined execution and contributions from domestic and international operations. EBITDA grew 81 per cent year-on-year during the quarter.As of June 30, 2026, the company’s standalone order book stood at Rs 17.54 billion, with around 60 per cent coming from oil and gas services and 40 per cent from min..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

BioBTX to Build First Commercial-Scale Circular Chemicals Plant

Dutch circular chemistry technology developer BioBTX is building what it says will be the world’s first commercial-scale plant to convert mixed plastic waste into high-quality aromatic chemicals using its proprietary Integrated Catalytic Cracking Process (ICCP) technology.The facility will be built at Chemical Park Delfzijl on the northern coast of the Netherlands and is expected to create 35 jobs. Covestro, which has been a shareholder and strategic partner of BioBTX since 2024, holds a mid-single-digit million-euro investment in the company.BioBTX’s ICCP technology uses catalytic pyrolys..

Next Story
Real Estate

Awfis Q1 FY27 PAT Jumps 140% as Revenue Rises 27%

Awfis Space Solutions reported a 140 per cent year-on-year rise in consolidated profit after tax (PAT) to Rs 240 million for Q1 FY27, compared with Rs 100 million in the corresponding quarter last year.Revenue from operations increased 27 per cent to Rs 4.25 billion from Rs 3.35 billion, while EBITDA rose 28 per cent to Rs 1.62 billion. EBITDA margin improved to 38.2 per cent from 37.8 per cent. Profit before tax increased 135 per cent to Rs 240 million.The company's co-working business recorded 27 per cent year-on-year growth, supported by demand from enterprises, Global Capability Centres (G..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement