Homebuyers have the right to choose between RERA and Consumer Forum
Real Estate

Homebuyers have the right to choose between RERA and Consumer Forum

 
Real estate companies since the advent of RERA, have reiterated that homebuyers cannot file complaints against them in consumer forum. On the same lines real estate firm M/s Imperia Structures raised the contention that once the RERA came into force all the queries related to construction and completion of the property have to be dealt with under this law. 
Supreme Court on Monday declined this contention.

M/s Imperia Structures had filed an appeal against the judgment of the NCDRC on the complaint of 10 homebuyers of its housing scheme called the ESFERA in Sector 13C, Gurgaon, Haryana. The project was launched in 2011 and the complainants had booked their apartments in 2011-12 by paying the booking amounts and later approached the NCDRC alleging that despite the lapse of 42 months there was no chance for them to get the possession of their dream homes.
 
While deciding on the appeal Supreme Court made it clear that despite the enactment of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, homebuyers can approach Consumer Forum for refund and compensation against real estate firms. And imposed costs of Rs.50,000 to be paid by the builder in respect of each of the Consumer Case.
 
One of the conclusions arrived at by the Court was “RERA is to be read harmoniously with the Code, as amended by the Amendment Act. It is only in the event of a conflict that the Code will prevail over RERA. Remedies that are given to allottees of flats or apartments are therefore concurrent remedies, such allottees of flats or apartments being in a position to avail of remedies under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, RERA as well as the triggering of the Code.”

The bench comprising of Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran in its judgment mentioned “The RERA does not statutorily force a person to withdraw any such complaint nor do the provisions of the RERA Act create any mechanism for transfer of such pending proceedings to authorities under the RERA Act. Again, insofar as cases, where such proceedings under the CP Act are initiated after the provisions of the RERA Act, came into force, there is nothing in the RERA Act which bars such initiation. The absence of bar under Section 79 to the initiation of proceedings before a forum which cannot be called a Civil Court and express saving under Section 88 of the RERA Act, make the position quite clear,”

This can be construed as a landmark judgement for the homebuyers because it highlights the fact that homebuyers have the right to choose between both RERA and the Consumer Forum for initiating complaints against the builder. 

 Real estate companies since the advent of RERA, have reiterated that homebuyers cannot file complaints against them in consumer forum. On the same lines real estate firm M/s Imperia Structures raised the contention that once the RERA came into force all the queries related to construction and completion of the property have to be dealt with under this law. Supreme Court on Monday declined this contention.M/s Imperia Structures had filed an appeal against the judgment of the NCDRC on the complaint of 10 homebuyers of its housing scheme called the ESFERA in Sector 13C, Gurgaon, Haryana. The project was launched in 2011 and the complainants had booked their apartments in 2011-12 by paying the booking amounts and later approached the NCDRC alleging that despite the lapse of 42 months there was no chance for them to get the possession of their dream homes. While deciding on the appeal Supreme Court made it clear that despite the enactment of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, homebuyers can approach Consumer Forum for refund and compensation against real estate firms. And imposed costs of Rs.50,000 to be paid by the builder in respect of each of the Consumer Case. One of the conclusions arrived at by the Court was “RERA is to be read harmoniously with the Code, as amended by the Amendment Act. It is only in the event of a conflict that the Code will prevail over RERA. Remedies that are given to allottees of flats or apartments are therefore concurrent remedies, such allottees of flats or apartments being in a position to avail of remedies under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, RERA as well as the triggering of the Code.”The bench comprising of Justices UU Lalit and Vineet Saran in its judgment mentioned “The RERA does not statutorily force a person to withdraw any such complaint nor do the provisions of the RERA Act create any mechanism for transfer of such pending proceedings to authorities under the RERA Act. Again, insofar as cases, where such proceedings under the CP Act are initiated after the provisions of the RERA Act, came into force, there is nothing in the RERA Act which bars such initiation. The absence of bar under Section 79 to the initiation of proceedings before a forum which cannot be called a Civil Court and express saving under Section 88 of the RERA Act, make the position quite clear,”This can be construed as a landmark judgement for the homebuyers because it highlights the fact that homebuyers have the right to choose between both RERA and the Consumer Forum for initiating complaints against the builder. 

Next Story
Resources

Jyoti Structures Launches Heat Safety Drive Across Sites

Jyoti Structures (JSL) has strengthened heat safety measures across its project sites and manufacturing facilities as temperatures rise across India. The company has implemented a Summer Safety Plan covering all transmission line projects to address risks related to heat stress, dehydration and worker fatigue.The initiative includes rescheduling work away from peak afternoon temperatures, provision of drinking water, ORS and lemon-salt solutions, and installation of rest shelters near work areas. Daily toolbox talks, worker health monitoring, first-aid preparedness, emergency transport arrange..

Next Story
Real Estate

MHADA Declares 82 Buildings Most Dangerous in Central and South Mumbai

The Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) has declared 82 buildings as most dangerous across Central and South Mumbai and has appealed to residents to vacate immediately. The list, prepared after structural assessments by the authority, identifies buildings judged to pose imminent risk to occupants and to passersby. Local civic bodies have been asked to coordinate evacuations and to make arrangements for temporary shelter and rehabilitation for displaced households. Officials said the authority prioritised buildings with visible structural distress, severe cracking, tiltin..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Damage Reported At Halwara Airport Terminal After First Rains

Severe damage was reported at the terminal of Halwara Airport during the first major rain spell of the season, prompting immediate concern among aviation and local authorities. Images from the site showed water ingress and visible deterioration of the terminal interior, affecting passenger areas and ancillary services. The airport authority suspended certain operations temporarily to assess structural safety and ensure passenger wellbeing. Preliminary inspections have prioritised electrical systems and roof seals to prevent further water ingress. State aviation officials ordered a formal inqui..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement