+
MahaRERA to decide on compensation payable to flat buyers
Real Estate

MahaRERA to decide on compensation payable to flat buyers

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has held that it has jurisdiction to decide on compensation payable to flat buyers for the mental torment induced due to delay in possession.

The order was released on a complaint by Sanjay and Shailaja Gaikwad, who asked for not only direction to Omkar Realtors and Developers to hand over ownership of the flat and to pay interest for delayed possession, but additionally Rs 2 crore compensation for the “mental torment and agony” caused to them.

The Gaikwads had booked an apartment on the 46th floor of tower C of Omkar 1973 Worli on June 27, 2017, and were to obtain ownership on June 30, 2019. They paid Rs 21 crore of the complete consideration of Rs 24.5 crore and Rs 1.22 crore towards stamp duty and registration costs. But, Omkar failed to give the flat. The couple requested interest from June 30, 2019, till the actual date of ownership.

Their complaint said that the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 permits only six months of extension for reasons beyond the promoter’s control. Thus, such extension, due to force majeure conditions, can be prolonged only up to December 31, 2019, and not beyond. Omkar “unilaterally and unlawfully” extended the deadline of completion till June 30, this year. Omkar replied that June 30, 2021, due date for possession was announced on the RERA website due to several factors, including the development speed.

The Gaikwads were notified that due to factors beyond their control, involving the Covid-19 pandemic, the flat would have been given according to the revised date. Omkar said Gaikwads’ claim for compensation is premature and must be discharged with exemplary costs. It said that compensation claim has to be dealt with by MahaRERA’s adjudicating officer, under Section 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. But Gaikwad’s advocate Godfrey Pimenta referred to MahaRERA appellate tribunal’s decision in the Pankaj Agarwal case to claim that besides dealing with a complaint asking for numerous reliefs, MahaRERA has to additionally decide the compensation claim.

Image Source

The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority (MahaRERA) has held that it has jurisdiction to decide on compensation payable to flat buyers for the mental torment induced due to delay in possession. The order was released on a complaint by Sanjay and Shailaja Gaikwad, who asked for not only direction to Omkar Realtors and Developers to hand over ownership of the flat and to pay interest for delayed possession, but additionally Rs 2 crore compensation for the “mental torment and agony” caused to them. The Gaikwads had booked an apartment on the 46th floor of tower C of Omkar 1973 Worli on June 27, 2017, and were to obtain ownership on June 30, 2019. They paid Rs 21 crore of the complete consideration of Rs 24.5 crore and Rs 1.22 crore towards stamp duty and registration costs. But, Omkar failed to give the flat. The couple requested interest from June 30, 2019, till the actual date of ownership. Their complaint said that the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 permits only six months of extension for reasons beyond the promoter’s control. Thus, such extension, due to force majeure conditions, can be prolonged only up to December 31, 2019, and not beyond. Omkar “unilaterally and unlawfully” extended the deadline of completion till June 30, this year. Omkar replied that June 30, 2021, due date for possession was announced on the RERA website due to several factors, including the development speed. The Gaikwads were notified that due to factors beyond their control, involving the Covid-19 pandemic, the flat would have been given according to the revised date. Omkar said Gaikwads’ claim for compensation is premature and must be discharged with exemplary costs. It said that compensation claim has to be dealt with by MahaRERA’s adjudicating officer, under Section 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. But Gaikwad’s advocate Godfrey Pimenta referred to MahaRERA appellate tribunal’s decision in the Pankaj Agarwal case to claim that besides dealing with a complaint asking for numerous reliefs, MahaRERA has to additionally decide the compensation claim. Image Source

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Lucknow Metro East-West Corridor Consultancy Contract Awarded

The Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has awarded the first construction-related consultancy contract for the Lucknow Metro East West Corridor to a joint venture of AYESA Ingenieria Arquitectura SAU and AYESA India Pvt Ltd. The firm was declared the lowest bidder for the Detailed Design Consultant contract for Lucknow Metro Line-2 under Phase 1B and the contract was recommended following the financial bid. The contract is valued at Rs 159.0 million (mn), covering design services for the corridor. Lucknow Metro Line-2 envisages the construction of an 11.165 kilometre corridor connecting Cha..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Div Com Kashmir Urges Fast Tracking Of Jhelum Water Transport Project

The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir has called for the fast-tracking of the Jhelum water transport project, urging district administrations and relevant agencies to accelerate planning and clearances. In a meeting convened at the divisional headquarters, the commissioner instructed officials from irrigation, public health engineering and municipal departments to prioritise the project and coordinate survey and design work. The directive emphasised removal of administrative bottlenecks and close monitoring to ensure timely mobilisation of resources and contractors. Officials were told to in..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Interarch Reports Strong Q3 And Nine Month Results

Interarch Building Solutions Limited reported unaudited results for the third quarter and nine months ended 31 December 2025, recording strong revenue growth driven by execution and a robust order book. Net revenue for the third quarter rose by 43.7 per cent to Rs 5.225 billion (bn), compared with Rs 3.636 bn a year earlier, reflecting heightened demand in pre-engineered building projects. The company’s total order book as at 31 January 2026 stood at Rs 16.85 bn, supporting near-term visibility. EBITDA excluding other income for the quarter increased by 43.2 per cent to Rs 503 million (mn),..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Open In App