Road projects awarded in HAM dried up
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

Road projects awarded in HAM dried up

Awards in HAM assets have significantly dried up, the main reasons being delay in promised land acquisition by NHAI and large lead times in obtaining other regulatory clearances.

Source: Equirus Capital

“Average land acquisition costs have spiked from Rs 9.2 million per hectare in FY14 to Rs 23.8 million per hectare in FY18,” says Vijay Agrawal, Executive Director, Equirus Capital. This has created a lot of funding apprehensions where banks are insisting on releasing funds only after the majority of the land is available. He also points out that developers have submitted aggressive bids for HAM projects and have won many more projects than they can finance. 

Public-sector banks, clearly, are wary of funding new road projects. Lenders are asking developers to show upfront project equity before loan sanction or disbursement. This has delayed financial closure (FC) of HAM projects leading to delays. And, in view of delayed FC, NHAI has slowed down HAM bidding and is focussing on EPC bids.

Devayan Dey, Director-Capital Projects and Infrastructure, PWC, views the reasons for financing challenges as fairly clichéd in terms of poor liquidity, poor capacity or credit worthiness of players, hitches around termination clauses, etc. What’s more important, in his opinion, is to understand what led to such a situation. “These reasons are just intermediary outcomes and not the cause,” he explains. “The root cause can be traced back to procurement norms, especially the qualification criteria not having been reformed for over a decade and being easy to bypass. While land acquisition and clearance issues do persist, the issues are amplified when aspiration versus capacity mismatch remains unchecked by procurement filters. Lack of capacity quickly transforms into delivery issues and lenders started losing confidence.” Lenders are not averse to lending unless the balance sheet and capacity of the borrower do not provide enough confidence. However, it is definitely taking more time.


Looking at projects awarded in the past two years, Rajeshwar Burla, Assistant Vice President & Associate Head-Corporate Ratings, ICRA, says,  “HAM and EPC together accounted for over 95 per cent of total awards with EPC accounting for around 50 per cent followed by HAM at around 45 per cent.” He adds that a majority of the Bharatmala programme is proposed to be executed through the EPC route. So, the current award mix is better in terms of private-sector participation compared to the proposed funding plan. 

“As such, from NHAI’s side, currently there are no funding challenges for HAM projects,” Burla confirms. “But as far as funding challenges for developers (concessionaires for BOT-HAM projects) are concerned, he says, “Overall, there has been improvement in acceptance levels for national highway-HAM projects from lenders. The time taken to achieve FC has reduced considerably – by more than 50 per cent from 430 days in FY2016 to 194 days in FY2018. However, FC-related challenges resurfaced given that many PSU banks are under prompt corrective action.” He adds that, increasingly, for new developers taking high exposure to HAM projects, achieving closure could be even more challenging in the current situation. Given the low equity requirement for HAM, lenders are concerned about the developer’s commitment till the end of the concession period, especially given that some developers have limited experience in the development space – many tier-II developers have won HAM projects.

SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVAN

Awards in HAM assets have significantly dried up, the main reasons being delay in promised land acquisition by NHAI and large lead times in obtaining other regulatory clearances.Source: Equirus Capital“Average land acquisition costs have spiked from Rs 9.2 million per hectare in FY14 to Rs 23.8 million per hectare in FY18,” says Vijay Agrawal, Executive Director, Equirus Capital. This has created a lot of funding apprehensions where banks are insisting on releasing funds only after the majority of the land is available. He also points out that developers have submitted aggressive bids for HAM projects and have won many more projects than they can finance. Public-sector banks, clearly, are wary of funding new road projects. Lenders are asking developers to show upfront project equity before loan sanction or disbursement. This has delayed financial closure (FC) of HAM projects leading to delays. And, in view of delayed FC, NHAI has slowed down HAM bidding and is focussing on EPC bids.Devayan Dey, Director-Capital Projects and Infrastructure, PWC, views the reasons for financing challenges as fairly clichéd in terms of poor liquidity, poor capacity or credit worthiness of players, hitches around termination clauses, etc. What’s more important, in his opinion, is to understand what led to such a situation. “These reasons are just intermediary outcomes and not the cause,” he explains. “The root cause can be traced back to procurement norms, especially the qualification criteria not having been reformed for over a decade and being easy to bypass. While land acquisition and clearance issues do persist, the issues are amplified when aspiration versus capacity mismatch remains unchecked by procurement filters. Lack of capacity quickly transforms into delivery issues and lenders started losing confidence.” Lenders are not averse to lending unless the balance sheet and capacity of the borrower do not provide enough confidence. However, it is definitely taking more time.Looking at projects awarded in the past two years, Rajeshwar Burla, Assistant Vice President & Associate Head-Corporate Ratings, ICRA, says,  “HAM and EPC together accounted for over 95 per cent of total awards with EPC accounting for around 50 per cent followed by HAM at around 45 per cent.” He adds that a majority of the Bharatmala programme is proposed to be executed through the EPC route. So, the current award mix is better in terms of private-sector participation compared to the proposed funding plan. “As such, from NHAI’s side, currently there are no funding challenges for HAM projects,” Burla confirms. “But as far as funding challenges for developers (concessionaires for BOT-HAM projects) are concerned, he says, “Overall, there has been improvement in acceptance levels for national highway-HAM projects from lenders. The time taken to achieve FC has reduced considerably – by more than 50 per cent from 430 days in FY2016 to 194 days in FY2018. However, FC-related challenges resurfaced given that many PSU banks are under prompt corrective action.” He adds that, increasingly, for new developers taking high exposure to HAM projects, achieving closure could be even more challenging in the current situation. Given the low equity requirement for HAM, lenders are concerned about the developer’s commitment till the end of the concession period, especially given that some developers have limited experience in the development space – many tier-II developers have won HAM projects. SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVAN

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

NHAI to Build 6-Lane Agra-Gwalior Expressway on BOT (Toll) Mode

To enhance connectivity between the tourism hubs of Agra and Gwalior, National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) will develop 88 km long 6-lane access controlled Agra-Gwalior Greenfield Expressway (NH-719D). NHAI, today signed a concession agreement for the implementation of project with GR Infraprojects, in presence of NHAI Chairman, Santosh Kumar Yadav and senior officials of NHAI and the Concessionaire. The Agra-Gwalior Greenfield Expressway will start from Deori village in Agra and terminate at Susera village in Gwalior. The project shall be developed at a Total Capital Cost of Rs 46.13 b..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Cabinet Nods 166.8-km NH-6 Greenfield Corridor on HAM Mode

The Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs chaired by the Prime Minister Narendra Modi has approved the proposal for Development, Maintenance and Management of 4-lane Greenfield Access Controlled 166.80 km of National Highway No. 06 from Mawlyngkhung (near Shillong) in Meghalaya to Panchgram (near Silchar) in Assam on Hybrid Annuity Mode as an access controlled greenfield High-Speed Corridor at a total capital cost of Rs 228.64 billion. The project length of 166.80 km lies in Meghalaya (144.80 km) and Assam (22.00 km). The proposed Greenfield high-speed corridor will improve the service level ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Commercial Ops Begin at Multi-Modal Logistics Park in Nagpur

Under the PM Gati Shakti initiative of Prime Minister with the aim to provide seamless and efficient connectivity for the movement of people, goods and services across various modes of transport, thereby enhancing last-mile connectivity and reducing travel time, and under the guidance of Union Minister of Road Transport and Highways, Nitin Gadkari, the Multi Modal Logistics Park, Nagpur (MMLP Nagpur) at Sindi, near Wardha commenced its commercial operations with a goal to establish a faster link. The MMLP Nagpur established by National Highway Logistics Management (NHLML), a 100 per cent own..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?