Tata Steel Faces Rs 24.11-Bn Demand from Odisha Authorities
COAL & MINING

Tata Steel Faces Rs 24.11-Bn Demand from Odisha Authorities

Shares of Tata Steel came under pressure as the company faces a fresh financial demand of Rs 24.11 billion from Odisha authorities. The claim arises from alleged shortfalls in dispatch obligations at the company’s Sukinda mine under the Mine Development and Production Agreement (MDPA). Authorities have included both the asserted sale value of the shortfall and the appropriation of performance security under Rule 12A of the Minerals Concession Rules, 2016.

Tata Steel has disputed the demand, stating that it has substantial grounds to challenge it legally. In a statement, the company said, “The company believes that the State's demands lack justification/substantive basis, and that it has good grounds to challenge the said demand, both on law and merits. Accordingly, the Company will pursue suitable legal remedies before the appropriate judicial and/or quasi-judicial forum(s).”

The company’s stock closed 3.40 per cent lower at Rs 173.20 on BSE, with a market capitalisation of Rs 2.16 trillion and a turnover of Rs 500.93 million.

This follows a previous demand of Rs 19.02 billion for the fourth year, which Tata Steel is already contesting in the Orissa High Court. The court granted an interim stay on August 14, 2025, later extended on September 2, halting any coercive action.

Observers note that the case underscores the strategic importance of the Sukinda mine and highlights challenges faced by mining companies in navigating evolving regulatory frameworks in India’s resource sector. Tata Steel maintains confidence in its compliance track record while the matter awaits further judicial proceedings.

Shares of Tata Steel came under pressure as the company faces a fresh financial demand of Rs 24.11 billion from Odisha authorities. The claim arises from alleged shortfalls in dispatch obligations at the company’s Sukinda mine under the Mine Development and Production Agreement (MDPA). Authorities have included both the asserted sale value of the shortfall and the appropriation of performance security under Rule 12A of the Minerals Concession Rules, 2016.Tata Steel has disputed the demand, stating that it has substantial grounds to challenge it legally. In a statement, the company said, “The company believes that the State's demands lack justification/substantive basis, and that it has good grounds to challenge the said demand, both on law and merits. Accordingly, the Company will pursue suitable legal remedies before the appropriate judicial and/or quasi-judicial forum(s).”The company’s stock closed 3.40 per cent lower at Rs 173.20 on BSE, with a market capitalisation of Rs 2.16 trillion and a turnover of Rs 500.93 million.This follows a previous demand of Rs 19.02 billion for the fourth year, which Tata Steel is already contesting in the Orissa High Court. The court granted an interim stay on August 14, 2025, later extended on September 2, halting any coercive action.Observers note that the case underscores the strategic importance of the Sukinda mine and highlights challenges faced by mining companies in navigating evolving regulatory frameworks in India’s resource sector. Tata Steel maintains confidence in its compliance track record while the matter awaits further judicial proceedings.

Next Story
Technology

Building Faster, Smarter, and Greener!

Backed by ULCCS’s century-old legacy, U-Sphere combines technology, modular design and sustainable practices to deliver faster and more efficient projects. In an interaction with CW, Rohit Prabhakar, Director - Business Development, shares how the company’s integrated model of ‘Speed-Build’, ‘Smart-Build’ and ‘Sustain-Build’ is redefining construction efficiency, quality and environmental responsibility in India.U-Sphere positions itself at the intersection of speed, sustainability and smart design. How does this translate into measurable efficiency on the ground?At U..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Smart Roads, Smarter India

India’s infrastructure boom is not only about laying more kilometres of highways – it’s about building them smarter, safer and more sustainably. From drones mapping fragile Himalayan slopes to 3D machine-controlled graders reducing human error, technology is steadily reshaping the way projects are planned and executed. Yet, the journey towards digitisation remains complex, demanding not just capital but also coordination, training and vision.Until recently, engineers largely depended on Survey of India toposheets and traditional survey methods like total stations or DGPS to prepare detai..

Next Story
Real Estate

What Does DCPR 2034 Mean?

The Maharashtra government has eased approval norms for high-rise buildings under DCPR 2034, enabling the municipal commissioner to sanction projects up to 180 m on large plots. This change is expected to streamline approvals, reduce procedural delays and accelerate redevelopment, drawing reactions from developers, planners and industry experts about its implications for Mumbai’s vertical growth.Under the revised DCPR 2034 rules, buildings on plots of 2,000 sq m or more can now be approved up to 180 m by the municipal commissioner, provided structural and geotechnical reports are certified b..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?