Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act
Real Estate

Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court.

The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate.

Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service.

The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate.

The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute.

According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities.

India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired.

Image Source

"Join industry leaders at RAHSTA Expo, India's premier platform for roads, highways and traffic infrastructure. Register now to explore innovations, network with experts and shape the future of mobility."

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate. Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service. The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate. The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute. According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities. India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired. Image Source

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Centre Prioritising Energy Security With Coal Gasification

Union minister for Coal and Mines G Kishan Reddy said the Centre is prioritising energy security through a strategic shift to coal gasification and has announced incentives totalling Rs 460 billion (bn) to support the effort. He said more than 35 companies will start coal gasification activities in India within two months and that the government is encouraging firms that bring technology to close the domestic technology gap. The minister described the initiative as aimed at reducing import dependence and developing indigenous capacity. India has the fifth-largest coal reserve in the world, and..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

BHEL and Coal India Invest Rs 250 bn in Odisha Gasification

Bharat Heavy Electricals (BHEL) and Coal India (CIL) are jointly investing Rs 250 billion in a coal gasification project in Odisha, with the Prime Minister laying the foundation stone in Jharsuguda. Union Coal and Mines Minister G Kishan Reddy described the initiative as a transformative shift in coal utilisation that will open industrial avenues for the state. The project moves coal beyond conventional power generation to industrial feedstocks. Coal gasification will convert coal into synthesis gas, a versatile feedstock for chemicals, fertilisers and synthetic fuels, and the technology is ex..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

BCCL Hands Over Dugdha Coal Washery To JSW Steel

Bharat Coking Coal has handed over the Dugdha Coal Washery to JSW Steel, marking the first coal washery asset monetisation under the Ministry of Coal's asset monetisation programme. The handover took place in the presence of senior officials from Bharat Coking Coal Ltd, JSW Steel and JSW Energy. The washery has a capacity of two million tonnes per annum (mn t per annum), and its transfer is intended to introduce private sector practices into coal beneficiation operations. The monetisation is aimed at modernising coal sector assets, improving operational efficiency and enhancing resource utilis..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement