Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act
Real Estate

Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court.

The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate.

Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service.

The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate.

The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute.

According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities.

India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired.

Image Source

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate. Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service. The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate. The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute. According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities. India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired. Image Source

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Asian Energy Services Q1 FY27 PAT Rises 129 Per Cent

Asian Energy Services Limited reported a 129 per cent year-on-year rise in net profit to Rs 128 million for Q1 FY27, compared with the corresponding quarter last year.Revenue increased 135 per cent year-on-year to Rs 2.71 billion, supported by continued momentum across its services business, disciplined execution and contributions from domestic and international operations. EBITDA grew 81 per cent year-on-year during the quarter.As of June 30, 2026, the company’s standalone order book stood at Rs 17.54 billion, with around 60 per cent coming from oil and gas services and 40 per cent from min..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

BioBTX to Build First Commercial-Scale Circular Chemicals Plant

Dutch circular chemistry technology developer BioBTX is building what it says will be the world’s first commercial-scale plant to convert mixed plastic waste into high-quality aromatic chemicals using its proprietary Integrated Catalytic Cracking Process (ICCP) technology.The facility will be built at Chemical Park Delfzijl on the northern coast of the Netherlands and is expected to create 35 jobs. Covestro, which has been a shareholder and strategic partner of BioBTX since 2024, holds a mid-single-digit million-euro investment in the company.BioBTX’s ICCP technology uses catalytic pyrolys..

Next Story
Real Estate

Awfis Q1 FY27 PAT Jumps 140% as Revenue Rises 27%

Awfis Space Solutions reported a 140 per cent year-on-year rise in consolidated profit after tax (PAT) to Rs 240 million for Q1 FY27, compared with Rs 100 million in the corresponding quarter last year.Revenue from operations increased 27 per cent to Rs 4.25 billion from Rs 3.35 billion, while EBITDA rose 28 per cent to Rs 1.62 billion. EBITDA margin improved to 38.2 per cent from 37.8 per cent. Profit before tax increased 135 per cent to Rs 240 million.The company's co-working business recorded 27 per cent year-on-year growth, supported by demand from enterprises, Global Capability Centres (G..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement