Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act
Real Estate

Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court.

The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate.

Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service.

The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate.

The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute.

According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities.

India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired.

Image Source

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate. Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service. The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate. The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute. According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities. India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired. Image Source

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Aadhaar Authentications Cross 27 Billion in FY25

Aadhaar authentication transactions surged past 27.07 billion in FY 2024–25, including 2.47 billion in March alone, reflecting its growing adoption across sectors such as banking, finance, telecom, and public service delivery. Since its inception, the cumulative number of Aadhaar authentication transactions has exceeded 148 billion.The Unique Identification Authority of India’s (UIDAI) AI/ML-based face authentication technology is also witnessing a sharp rise in usage. In March 2025 alone, over 150 million face authentication transactions were recorded. This biometric modality is now used ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

IEPFA Holds Preparatory Meet for 'Niveshak Shivir' Initiative

The Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (IEPFA), under the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, hosted a preparatory meeting on April 28, 2025, with Nodal Officers from stakeholder companies via video conference. The session, chaired by IEPFA CEO Smt. Anita Shah Akella, focused on finalising operational plans for the upcoming ""Niveshak Shivir"" initiative—a joint effort between IEPFA and the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI).""Niveshak Shivir"" aims to improve investor services and streamline the claims process by reaching out to cities with a high nu..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India, France Sign Deal for 26 Rafale-Marine Jets for Navy

India and France have signed an Inter-Governmental Agreement (IGA) for the acquisition of 26 Rafale-Marine aircraft for the Indian Navy, comprising 22 single-seater and four twin-seater jets. The deal also includes training systems, simulators, associated equipment, weapons, and performance-based logistics, along with additional equipment for the Indian Air Force’s existing Rafale fleet.The IGA was signed by India’s Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and French Minister of Armed Forces Sébastien Lecornu. The agreement, along with supply protocols for aircraft and weapons, was exchanged in the..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?