Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act
Real Estate

Builder's Failure To Obtain Occupation Certificate Under Consumer Act

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court.

The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate.

Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service.

The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate.

The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute.

According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities.

India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired.

Image Source

A builder's failure to obtain an occupation certificate is a deficiency in service under the Consumer Protection Act of 1988, according to the Supreme Court. The bench comprising Justices DY Chandrachud and AS Bopanna observed that the flat purchasers are well within their rights as consumers to seek compensation as recompense for the owners' subsequent liability, such as payment of higher taxes and water charges, arising from the lack of an occupancy certificate. Samruddhi Co-operative Housing Society Ltd filed a complaint, in this case, seeking a refund of the excess taxes and charges paid to the municipal authorities as a result of the builder, Mumbai Mahalaxmi Construction Pvt Limited, allegedly failing to provide adequate service. The complainant claimed that because the builder failed to obtain an occupancy certificate, its members had to pay a 25% higher property tax and an additional 50% toward water charges as a result of the builder's failure to obtain an occupancy certificate. The complaint was dismissed by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) because it was barred by limitation and was not maintainable because it was like a recovery proceeding rather than a consumer dispute. According to NCDRC, the Housing Society is not a consumer under the Consumer Protection Act because it has sought reimbursement from the builder for higher charges paid to the municipal authorities. India's National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) is a quasi-judicial body established in 1988 under the Consumer Protection Act of 1986. Its headquarters are in New Delhi. The commission is led by a Supreme Court of India judge who is either currently serving or has recently retired. Image Source

Next Story
Real Estate

Mahindra Lifespaces Bags Rs 12.5 billion Redevelopment in Mulund

Mahindra Lifespace Developers (MLDL), the real estate and infrastructure development arm of the Mahindra Group, has been appointed as the preferred developer for the redevelopment of a premium housing society in Mulund (West), Mumbai. The project will be developed across a 3.08-acre land parcel, with an estimated development value of approximately Rs 12.5 billion. Strategically located, the site enjoys proximity to major connectivity points—just 1.4 km from the upcoming Mumbai Metro Line 5 and 0.8 km from the Goregaon-Mulund Link Road. It also offers seamless access to the Eastern Expre..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Snowman Adds Warehouses in Kolkata and Krishnapatnam

Snowman Logistics, India’s leading integrated temperature-controlled logistics company, has announced the commencement of operations at its two new state-of-the-art, owned cold storage facilities in Kolkata and Krishnapatnam. With these additions, the company’s total pallet capacity has reached 1,50,754, spanning 43 warehouses in 20 cities across the country. The newly operational Kolkata facility offers a storage capacity of 5,630 pallets, while the Krishnapatnam facility holds 3,927 pallets. These warehouses are equipped with advanced automation and infrastructure designed to enhanc..

Next Story
Resources

Noesis Enables IHCL Hotel Deal in Udupi–Manipal Corridor

NOESIS Capital Advisors, India’s leading hotel investment advisory firm, has successfully facilitated a landmark hospitality transaction in the Udupi–Manipal region of Karnataka. The deal involves the acquisition of a nearly completed, 130-key upscale hotel that will operate under one of the premium brands of IHCL, reinforcing NOESIS’ position as a preferred partner for strategic hospitality transactions across India. Strategically located on the Udupi–Manipal Highway, the 1.03-acre property will cater to business travellers, pilgrims and families visiting Manipal University. With..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?