NCLT Declares Wadhwa Buildcon LLP's Resolution Plan Invalid
Real Estate

NCLT Declares Wadhwa Buildcon LLP's Resolution Plan Invalid

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has dealt a significant blow to Wadhwa Buildcon LLP by declaring their submitted resolution plan as invalid. This decision, made by the bankruptcy court's Mumbai bench, comes amidst mounting concerns over irregularities and the status of the company's promoters as wilful defaulters.

The matter was brought to light by the financial creditor Bank of India, which underscored various irregularities in the approval process of the resolution plan. These irregularities ultimately led to its rejection by the NCLT.

The court found substance in the arguments put forth by the lender, particularly concerning the conduct of the resolution professional. It was revealed that there was a drastic decrease in the voting percentage of the financial creditor, while the voting rights of homebuyers substantially increased.

Highlighting the vulnerability of homebuyers, the NCLT bench, presided over by judicial member Reeta Kohli and technical member Madhu Sinha, emphasized the importance of prioritizing their interests in such cases.

The actions of the resolution professional, including delays in presenting the plan and the failure to disclose crucial information about the promoters' wilful defaulter status, were deemed detrimental to the interests of the lender.

The court stressed the significance of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), which aims to prevent defaulting promoters from participating in the resolution process. It ruled that no resolution plan from a wilful defaulter can be accepted or approved.

Moreover, concerns were raised about the composition of the Committee of Creditors (COC), which appeared to be dominated by homebuyers lacking commercial wisdom and legal acumen.

In response to these findings, the court has set aside the resolution plan submitted by the promoters and granted an extension of 180 days for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to invite fresh expressions of interest.

This ruling underscores the imperative of transparency and fairness in the insolvency resolution process. It serves as a reminder for resolution professionals to uphold their duties impartially and ensure compliance with the law.

The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has dealt a significant blow to Wadhwa Buildcon LLP by declaring their submitted resolution plan as invalid. This decision, made by the bankruptcy court's Mumbai bench, comes amidst mounting concerns over irregularities and the status of the company's promoters as wilful defaulters. The matter was brought to light by the financial creditor Bank of India, which underscored various irregularities in the approval process of the resolution plan. These irregularities ultimately led to its rejection by the NCLT. The court found substance in the arguments put forth by the lender, particularly concerning the conduct of the resolution professional. It was revealed that there was a drastic decrease in the voting percentage of the financial creditor, while the voting rights of homebuyers substantially increased. Highlighting the vulnerability of homebuyers, the NCLT bench, presided over by judicial member Reeta Kohli and technical member Madhu Sinha, emphasized the importance of prioritizing their interests in such cases. The actions of the resolution professional, including delays in presenting the plan and the failure to disclose crucial information about the promoters' wilful defaulter status, were deemed detrimental to the interests of the lender. The court stressed the significance of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), which aims to prevent defaulting promoters from participating in the resolution process. It ruled that no resolution plan from a wilful defaulter can be accepted or approved. Moreover, concerns were raised about the composition of the Committee of Creditors (COC), which appeared to be dominated by homebuyers lacking commercial wisdom and legal acumen. In response to these findings, the court has set aside the resolution plan submitted by the promoters and granted an extension of 180 days for the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) to invite fresh expressions of interest. This ruling underscores the imperative of transparency and fairness in the insolvency resolution process. It serves as a reminder for resolution professionals to uphold their duties impartially and ensure compliance with the law.

Next Story
Technology

Building Faster, Smarter, and Greener!

Backed by ULCCS’s century-old legacy, U-Sphere combines technology, modular design and sustainable practices to deliver faster and more efficient projects. In an interaction with CW, Rohit Prabhakar, Director - Business Development, shares how the company’s integrated model of ‘Speed-Build’, ‘Smart-Build’ and ‘Sustain-Build’ is redefining construction efficiency, quality and environmental responsibility in India.U-Sphere positions itself at the intersection of speed, sustainability and smart design. How does this translate into measurable efficiency on the ground?At U..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Smart Roads, Smarter India

India’s infrastructure boom is not only about laying more kilometres of highways – it’s about building them smarter, safer and more sustainably. From drones mapping fragile Himalayan slopes to 3D machine-controlled graders reducing human error, technology is steadily reshaping the way projects are planned and executed. Yet, the journey towards digitisation remains complex, demanding not just capital but also coordination, training and vision.Until recently, engineers largely depended on Survey of India toposheets and traditional survey methods like total stations or DGPS to prepare detai..

Next Story
Real Estate

What Does DCPR 2034 Mean?

The Maharashtra government has eased approval norms for high-rise buildings under DCPR 2034, enabling the municipal commissioner to sanction projects up to 180 m on large plots. This change is expected to streamline approvals, reduce procedural delays and accelerate redevelopment, drawing reactions from developers, planners and industry experts about its implications for Mumbai’s vertical growth.Under the revised DCPR 2034 rules, buildings on plots of 2,000 sq m or more can now be approved up to 180 m by the municipal commissioner, provided structural and geotechnical reports are certified b..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?