Realtor-to-owner loan is operational debt: Tribunal
Real Estate

Realtor-to-owner loan is operational debt: Tribunal

In a precedent-setting verdict, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has deemed that a real estate company's advance to a property's owner for the proposed development qualifies as an operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).

NCLT admitted a petition filed by Sunteck Realty against Goodwill Theatres for initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process and has also declared a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC.

As per the terms, the termination could be avoided if both the parties mutually extend the pact in writing and the landlord or corporate debtor repays the advance along with interest.

The term sheet was terminated for some reason, and the development management agreement was never executed between the parties. However, according to the petition filed by Sunteck Realty, the advance paid to the corporate debtor was not returned despite repeated reminders.

A demand notice was also issued to recover nearly Rs 3.06 crore including interest, and after this, the developer moved the NCLT against Goodwill Theatres.

Goodwill Theatres responded by denying the term sheet's termination and asserted that Sunteck Realty was not an operational creditor within IBC as it had not provided any goods or services to it.

It was also pointed out that the term sheet was not a binding agreement and was just an agreement to enter into an agreement.

Sunteck claimed that under the term sheet, the property owner had agreed to appoint and engage the company for the performance of the services and the advance paid for availing goods and services was debt under IBC.

Goodwill Theatres had claimed that the developer relied upon a specific date in October 2018, as the date of termination.

However, there was no communication regarding such termination on that date, and hence the petition needed to be dismissed.

As part of its order, NCLT stated that under the binding term sheet, the property owner or corporate debtor had agreed to appoint the developer as its project manager for the performance of the project's services.

The court also concluded that Rs 2.51 crore paid to Goodwill Theatres was part of the service rendered by Sunteck Realty to the landlord and therefore qualified as operational debt in terms of Section 5(21) IBC.

In a precedent-setting verdict, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has deemed that a real estate company's advance to a property's owner for the proposed development qualifies as an operational debt under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).NCLT admitted a petition filed by Sunteck Realty against Goodwill Theatres for initiating a corporate insolvency resolution process and has also declared a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. As per the terms, the termination could be avoided if both the parties mutually extend the pact in writing and the landlord or corporate debtor repays the advance along with interest. The term sheet was terminated for some reason, and the development management agreement was never executed between the parties. However, according to the petition filed by Sunteck Realty, the advance paid to the corporate debtor was not returned despite repeated reminders. A demand notice was also issued to recover nearly Rs 3.06 crore including interest, and after this, the developer moved the NCLT against Goodwill Theatres. Goodwill Theatres responded by denying the term sheet's termination and asserted that Sunteck Realty was not an operational creditor within IBC as it had not provided any goods or services to it. It was also pointed out that the term sheet was not a binding agreement and was just an agreement to enter into an agreement. Sunteck claimed that under the term sheet, the property owner had agreed to appoint and engage the company for the performance of the services and the advance paid for availing goods and services was debt under IBC. Goodwill Theatres had claimed that the developer relied upon a specific date in October 2018, as the date of termination. However, there was no communication regarding such termination on that date, and hence the petition needed to be dismissed. As part of its order, NCLT stated that under the binding term sheet, the property owner or corporate debtor had agreed to appoint the developer as its project manager for the performance of the project's services. The court also concluded that Rs 2.51 crore paid to Goodwill Theatres was part of the service rendered by Sunteck Realty to the landlord and therefore qualified as operational debt in terms of Section 5(21) IBC.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Recycling Leaders Push for Policy Reforms in India

As India prepares for the largest recycling-focused event in its history, industry leaders are making a strong case for policy reforms to unlock the country’s circular economy potential. Ahead of the Bharat Recycling Show (BRS) 2025, co-located with Plastics Recycling Show (PRS) India, a high-level panel discussion in Mumbai spotlighted the urgent need for regulatory clarity, digital innovation, and integration of the informal sector.Held under the theme “Unlocking Circular Value: Regulatory and Market Trends in Recycling”, the panel brought together prominent voices from across the recy..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Environmental Hearing Set for 1000 MW Naying Hydro Project

The environmental public hearing for the 1,000 MW Naying hydroelectric project will take place on November 12 at Yapik community hall in Shi-Yomi district, Arunachal Pradesh, officials confirmed. The run-of-the-river project on the Siyom (Yomgo) river is being developed by the North Eastern Electric Power Corporation (NEEPCO). Construction, including a concrete dam, underground powerhouse, and tunnel, is expected to commence around 2028, with commissioning planned by 2032. The project aims to generate approximately 4,966.77 GWh of electricity. The Naying project received Central Electricity ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

India Achieves 490 MWh Energy Storage Capacity by June 2025

India’s cumulative energy storage capacity reached 490 MWh by June 2025, according to data released by the Central Electricity Authority (CEA). Of this, more than 85 per cent is associated with renewable energy projects, primarily solar and wind, reflecting the country’s accelerated shift towards grid stability and clean energy integration. The CEA report highlights that 16 energy storage systems are currently operational across 10 states, with major installations in Rajasthan, Gujarat, Karnataka, and Maharashtra. These include both standalone and co-located battery systems deployed by le..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?