SC says RERA can delegate powers to listen to homebuyer complaints
Real Estate

SC says RERA can delegate powers to listen to homebuyer complaints

The Supreme Court has said that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) can transfer its powers to a single member to listen to the complaints from homebuyers against builders.

A three-judge bench headed by Justice U U Lalit said that Section 81 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 enables the authority to transfer its functions and power to any of its members by general or special order.

The top court said that the scheme of the Act, 2016 renders an in-built mechanism and any order passed on a complaint by the authority is appealable if any clear error is left by the authority either in computation or in the amount refundable to the homebuyer or allottee.

The apex court said that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) is retroactive (taking effect from a date in the past) in nature and includes all ongoing projects for which a completion certificate has not been released.

The top court said that the legislative intent is to make the Act applicable not just to the projects which were yet to begin after the Act became operational but additionally to bring under its fold the continuing projects and to preserve from its inception the rights of the stakeholders.

The unambiguous language of the statute is retroactive in operation. The legislature consciously set a retroactive statute to ensure the sale of plot, flat or building, realty projects is done effectively and transparently so that the interest of consumers in the realty sector is preserved by all means.

The bench, additionally including Justices Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose, made it clear that the value which has been decided and refundable to the allottees or homebuyers either by the authority or the adjudicating officer in terms of the order is recoverable within the ambit of Section 40(1) of the Act.

The judgment dated November 11 came on a plea filed by Newtech Promoters and Developers against an Allahabad High Court order which rejected its appeal against an order of a single member of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority).

As per the order, the company was ordered to refund the principal sum along with interest to homebuyers who were not given possession of apartments on time.

Image Source

Also read: TN RERA to resolve complaints against projects made before 2016

The Supreme Court has said that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) can transfer its powers to a single member to listen to the complaints from homebuyers against builders. A three-judge bench headed by Justice U U Lalit said that Section 81 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 enables the authority to transfer its functions and power to any of its members by general or special order. The top court said that the scheme of the Act, 2016 renders an in-built mechanism and any order passed on a complaint by the authority is appealable if any clear error is left by the authority either in computation or in the amount refundable to the homebuyer or allottee. The apex court said that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) is retroactive (taking effect from a date in the past) in nature and includes all ongoing projects for which a completion certificate has not been released. The top court said that the legislative intent is to make the Act applicable not just to the projects which were yet to begin after the Act became operational but additionally to bring under its fold the continuing projects and to preserve from its inception the rights of the stakeholders. The unambiguous language of the statute is retroactive in operation. The legislature consciously set a retroactive statute to ensure the sale of plot, flat or building, realty projects is done effectively and transparently so that the interest of consumers in the realty sector is preserved by all means. The bench, additionally including Justices Ajay Rastogi and Aniruddha Bose, made it clear that the value which has been decided and refundable to the allottees or homebuyers either by the authority or the adjudicating officer in terms of the order is recoverable within the ambit of Section 40(1) of the Act. The judgment dated November 11 came on a plea filed by Newtech Promoters and Developers against an Allahabad High Court order which rejected its appeal against an order of a single member of the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (Authority). As per the order, the company was ordered to refund the principal sum along with interest to homebuyers who were not given possession of apartments on time. Image Source Also read: TN RERA to resolve complaints against projects made before 2016

Next Story
Technology

BBMP Pledges Faster E-Khata Processing Amid Citizen Complaints

Facing mounting complaints over delays in e-khata issuance, the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) has promised to resolve the issue within 10 days. BBMP Chief Commissioner Tushar Giri Nath assured citizens that efforts are underway to expedite processing rates from the current 2,000 to a target of 10,000–15,000 applications daily. "We have cleared 90% of the 90,000 pending applications, leaving only 4,500 to process. To meet the demand, over 800 additional staff and assistant revenue officers (AROs) have been deployed to manage applications in each ward," Nath stated. Persistent Dela..

Next Story
Real Estate

Delhi HC Orders DDA to Assist CBI in Housing Lapses Probe

The Delhi High Court has instructed the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to fully cooperate with the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in its probe into alleged lapses in the construction of 336 high-rise HIG/MIG houses at Signature View Apartments, north Delhi. Justice Chandra Dhari Singh emphasized that DDA must furnish information about any internal inquiry and the officials involved to facilitate the investigation. The court noted CBI’s submission that DDA had not responded to multiple reminders since July, delaying the probe. The CBI is investigating allegations of "cheating, crimi..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Mahindra Lifespace to Appeal Tamil Nadu GST Tax Demand

Mahindra Lifespace Developers Ltd has announced a tax demand of Rs 20.9 million imposed by the Tamil Nadu GST department, including interest and penalties. The order, issued by the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Chengalpattu, cites an alleged shortfall in GST payments under Section 74 of the GST Act, 2017. The realty firm refuted the allegations, stating, “Based on the company's assessment, there is no noncompliance, and a general penalty has been imposed.” The company plans to appeal the order, expressing confidence in a favorable resolution. Mahindra Lifespace assured stakeholders ..

Hi There!

"Now get regular updates from CW Magazine on WhatsApp!

Join the CW WhatsApp channel for the latest news, industry events, expert insights, and project updates from the construction and infrastructure industry.

Click the link below to join"

+91 81086 03000