+
Unfortunate process for young architects
Real Estate

Unfortunate process for young architects

The present tendering process is referred to by most as an “unfortunate” selection process of architects, which originated for the selection of construction agencies and is coordinated by engineers, not architects.

Indrajit S Kembhavi, Partner, Kembhavi Architecture Foundation (KAF), outlines the current tendering process:

  • Prequalification: Shortlisting firms based on their previous experience, manpower and financial capacity to undertake the project 
  • Technical evaluation: Based either on previous project or track record or design competition 
  • Financial price bid: Although the Council of Architecture has prescribed a minimum scale of fees, this is generally overlooked and financial bids are invited. 

The tenders are a weighted average of combination of strength of the technical bid score and the lower financial bids.
On his part, Debmalya Guha, Principal Architect and Planner, Pace Consultants, elaborates upon the eligibility criteria that restrict the entry of most young talented architects:

  • Company’s annual turnover or gross income: A firm led by a young architect of, say, eight to 10 employees will have an average turnover of Rs 2-4 million, but the eligibility criterion is Rs 10-50 million.
  • Experience of the firm: To get a project, one needs ‘similar’ experience; without this, you will not get a project
  • Earnest money deposit (EMD): This is one of the greatest deterrents for young, struggling architects. They need to deposit a huge amount of money, often ranging in lakhs, to express earnestness at the time of tender submission. The money remains stuck for an unlimited amount of time even after they are informed they have not got the project—we have not participated in many projects in the fear of our money being stuck.

Even after overcoming all the above mentioned hurdles, and getting the highest technical score, one may lose the project owing to a low quote. I have personally experienced situations where the design scheme selected as the best by the evaluation committee has not won the project as someone has quoted a much lower rate and bagged it.
However, the present selection process has slightly improved from blindly selecting the L1 (lowest bidder) to techno-commercial scoring. The usual norm is to go by 70:30 (technical: financial) scoring formula. But unfortunately, even this process is far from ensuring good architecture.

SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVAN

The present tendering process is referred to by most as an “unfortunate” selection process of architects, which originated for the selection of construction agencies and is coordinated by engineers, not architects.Indrajit S Kembhavi, Partner, Kembhavi Architecture Foundation (KAF), outlines the current tendering process:Prequalification: Shortlisting firms based on their previous experience, manpower and financial capacity to undertake the project Technical evaluation: Based either on previous project or track record or design competition Financial price bid: Although the Council of Architecture has prescribed a minimum scale of fees, this is generally overlooked and financial bids are invited. The tenders are a weighted average of combination of strength of the technical bid score and the lower financial bids.On his part, Debmalya Guha, Principal Architect and Planner, Pace Consultants, elaborates upon the eligibility criteria that restrict the entry of most young talented architects:Company’s annual turnover or gross income: A firm led by a young architect of, say, eight to 10 employees will have an average turnover of Rs 2-4 million, but the eligibility criterion is Rs 10-50 million.Experience of the firm: To get a project, one needs ‘similar’ experience; without this, you will not get a projectEarnest money deposit (EMD): This is one of the greatest deterrents for young, struggling architects. They need to deposit a huge amount of money, often ranging in lakhs, to express earnestness at the time of tender submission. The money remains stuck for an unlimited amount of time even after they are informed they have not got the project—we have not participated in many projects in the fear of our money being stuck.Even after overcoming all the above mentioned hurdles, and getting the highest technical score, one may lose the project owing to a low quote. I have personally experienced situations where the design scheme selected as the best by the evaluation committee has not won the project as someone has quoted a much lower rate and bagged it.However, the present selection process has slightly improved from blindly selecting the L1 (lowest bidder) to techno-commercial scoring. The usual norm is to go by 70:30 (technical: financial) scoring formula. But unfortunately, even this process is far from ensuring good architecture.SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVAN

Next Story
Real Estate

No glass boxes!

India is moving away from the ‘glass box’ syndrome, all-glass façades that were widely used in commercial buildings in the last two decades but came at a significant environmental cost given the country’s predominantly hot and humid climate. Poor thermal performance, excessive heat gain and dependency on mechanical cooling systems made buildings with glass façades energy guzzlers and significantly increased their carbon footprint.That said, it’s important to be aware that “glass is not the enemy,” points out Heena Bhargava, Architect, Architecture Discipline. “How it ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Why do pavements fail?

India’s highways continue to expand at a healthy pace. But conversations on the surface quality of highways are growing louder because major deficiencies and black spots continue to be identified, and they are cause for concern.“Road surface roughness causes vehicle vibrations that, in turn, can affect the performance of drivers,” explains Dr V K Gahlot, Road Safety Auditor, Centre for Research and Sustainable Development (CfRSD). “Continuous exposure may induce fatigue, a contributory factor to road accidents. Road surface roughness also affects the vehicle operating cost...

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

APAC Logistics Rents Fall for First Time Since 2020

Logistics rents across the Asia-Pacific region declined 0.4% year-on-year in H1 2025, marking the first annual drop since 2020, according to Knight Frank’s Logistics Highlights H1 2025 report. Despite global trade tensions and cautious occupier sentiment, India emerged as a standout performer, driven by robust manufacturing momentum and supply chain recalibration.Regional Trends and DivergenceWhile rents largely remained stable across most markets, regional differences became more pronounced:Mainland China continued to see rental declines, though the pace of decline moderated to 12.8% YoY, s..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?