Funding challenges in HAM projects for roads

01 Mar 2019 CW Team

On the government’s part, there has been a conscious shift in strategy from traditional BOT model towards EPC and HAM.

That said, it is evident that NHAI would need to significantly improve visibility of raising funds on their balance sheet, failing which, there may be speculations about their limited financial bandwidth,” says Sandeep Upadhyay, Managing Director- Infrastructure Advisory, Centrum Capital. “One of the primary challenge today is funding these projects for the next 15 years; so lenders and other stakeholders have to take a call on NHAIs leveraging capabilities over the next 15-20 years. The second impediment is the reluctance of Banks to fund HAM projects given the greenfield risks associated with it. The third risk is associated with the ability of promoters to bring in their contribution of 12-15 per cent of the total capex as equity in HAM projects.” Apart from the these challenges being faced for long term financing, the EPC companies are facing a huge push back from the Banks on the issuance of non-fund based limits against new orders on account of huge NPA fallout with EPC firms due to their BGs being invoked on account of non performance.

Of the total 108 HAM projects awarded to date, 60-odd projects have been awarded in FY2018. “Of these, as on February 7, 2019, around 45 per cent projects are yet to complete financial closure (FC) including 20 per cent wherein documents are yet to be submitted,” confirms Vishal Kotecha, Associate Director, India Ratings and Research (Fitch Group). A delay in FC is evident, for which, Kotecha points to “the lack of participation of PSU banks.”

HAM was introduced following the failure of the BOT toll model owing to aggressive initial traffic estimates. As Vijay Agrawal, Executive Director, Equirus Capital, says, “HAM was introduced to alleviate toll estimation pressures, get wider market participation in the PPP model and reduce funding pressures on the authority.” Nonetheless, he avers that HAM is also singing a similar tune as the BOT toll model.

Awards in HAM assets have significantly dried up, the main reasons being delay in promised land acquisition by NHAI and large lead times in obtaining other regulatory clearances.

SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVAN

Shift from Toll to HAM and back to EPC– Transition

On the government’s part, there has been a conscious shift in strategy from traditional BOT model towards EPC and HAM. That said, it is evident that NHAI would need to significantly improve visibility of raising funds on their balance sheet, failing which, there may be speculations about their limited financial bandwidth,” says Sandeep Upadhyay, Managing Director- Infrastructure Advisory, Centrum Capital. “One of the primary challenge today is funding these projects for the next 15 years; so lenders and other stakeholders have to take a call on NHAIs leveraging capabilities over the next 15-20 years. The second impediment is the reluctance of Banks to fund HAM projects given the greenfield risks associated with it. The third risk is associated with the ability of promoters to bring in their contribution of 12-15 per cent of the total capex as equity in HAM projects.” Apart from the these challenges being faced for long term financing, the EPC companies are facing a huge push back from the Banks on the issuance of non-fund based limits against new orders on account of huge NPA fallout with EPC firms due to their BGs being invoked on account of non performance.Of the total 108 HAM projects awarded to date, 60-odd projects have been awarded in FY2018. “Of these, as on February 7, 2019, around 45 per cent projects are yet to complete financial closure (FC) including 20 per cent wherein documents are yet to be submitted,” confirms Vishal Kotecha, Associate Director, India Ratings and Research (Fitch Group). A delay in FC is evident, for which, Kotecha points to “the lack of participation of PSU banks.” HAM was introduced following the failure of the BOT toll model owing to aggressive initial traffic estimates. As Vijay Agrawal, Executive Director, Equirus Capital, says, “HAM was introduced to alleviate toll estimation pressures, get wider market participation in the PPP model and reduce funding pressures on the authority.” Nonetheless, he avers that HAM is also singing a similar tune as the BOT toll model. Awards in HAM assets have significantly dried up, the main reasons being delay in promised land acquisition by NHAI and large lead times in obtaining other regulatory clearances. SHRIYAL SETHUMADHAVANShift from Toll to HAM and back to EPC– Transition

Infrastructure Urban

05 Nov 2025

TBO Tek Q2 Profit Climbs 12%, Revenue Surges 26% YoY

TBO Tek Limited one of the world’s largest travel distribution platforms, reported a solid performance for Q2 FY26 with a 26 per cent year-on-year increase in revenue to Rs 5.68 billion, reflecting broad-based growth and improving profitability.The company recorded a Gross Transaction Value (GTV) of Rs 8,901 crore, up 12 per cent YoY, driven by strong performance across Europe, MEA, and APAC regions. Adjusted EBITDA before acquisition-related costs stood at Rs 1.04 billion, up 16 per cent YoY, translating into an 18.32 per cent margin compared to 16.56 per cent in Q1 FY26. Profit after tax r..

Infrastructure Energy

05 Nov 2025

Northern Graphite, Rain Carbon Secure R&D Grant for Greener Battery Materials

Northern Graphite Corporation and Rain Carbon Canada Inc, a subsidiary of Rain Carbon Inc, have jointly received up to C$860,000 (€530,000) in funding under the Canada–Germany Collaborative Industrial Research and Development Programme to develop sustainable battery anode materials.The two-year, C$2.2 million project aims to transform natural graphite processing by-products into high-performance, battery-grade anode material (BAM). Supported by the National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Programme (NRC IRAP) and Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs a..

Infrastructure Urban

05 Nov 2025

Antony Waste Q2 Revenue Jumps 16%; Subsidiary Wins Rs 3,200 Cr WtE Projects

Antony Waste Handling Cell Limited (AWHCL), a leading player in India’s municipal solid waste management sector, announced a 16 per cent year-on-year increase in total operating revenue to Rs 2.33 billion for Q2 FY26. The growth was driven by higher waste volumes, escalated contracts, and strong operational execution.EBITDA rose 18 per cent to Rs 570 million, with margins steady at 21.6 per cent, while profit after tax stood at Rs 173 million, up 13 per cent YoY. Revenue from Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Transportation (MSW C&T) reached Rs 1.605 billion, and MSW Processing re..