SAROD-Ports - a dispute resolution mechanism
PORTS & SHIPPING

SAROD-Ports - a dispute resolution mechanism

Image courtesy: PTI Photo

On September 10, 2020, the Union Minister of Shipping, launched ‘SAROD-PORTS’ (Society for Affordable Redressal of Disputes – Ports) for dispute resolution in Maritime Sector, comprising of Major Ports, Non-Major Ports and PPP players operating at Major Ports. The launch of ‘SAROD-Ports’ is a much needed alternative step to resolve/reduce the disputes in the ports sector in less time and in a cost-effective manner. According to ICRA, this is a positive development for the sector. SAROD-Ports will consist of members from Indian Port Association (IPA) and Indian Private Ports and Terminal Association (IPPTA) and the empanelled arbitrators will comprise of retired chairman/deputy chairman of Major Port Trusts or retired or serving members of the Judiciary, Civil Servants, Public Sector undertakings who have experience in the port sector and arbitration process.

Giving further insights, Mr K. Ravichandran, Senior Vice President and Group -Head, ICRA Ratings says, “The credit profile of several port sector entities has been impacted by large contingent liabilities arising from prolonged disputes and hence the launch of SAROD-Ports should be credit positive for the sector. However, the success of the mechanism remains to be seen, as it will depend on the willingness of existing concessionaires to opt for it. This should be more useful for disputes, where the quantum of liability is smaller and it will be prudent for both parties to settle in a speedy manner. Further, the provision to bring in experts in arbitration process should also be a favourable factor, as industry members have at times cited dissatisfaction with arbitrators not having sufficient understanding of the port sector”.

In the last two decades, there has been increasing shift towards PPP projects and landlord port model by the Major Ports, where terminals for specific cargo segments are developed and operated by private players on BOT basis. However, in many cases there have been disputes with the Major Port Trust related to terms of concession including revenue share/royalty; the meeting of minimum guaranteed performance standards and volumes; facilities and maintenance work to be done by the Port Trust etc. apart from disputes with regulatory authorities like TAMP. These disputes in many instances have dragged on for several years, as the parties may first go for arbitration and then fight the cases in higher courts. This results in high arbitration and litigation costs for both the ports as well as the private players. The launch of ‘SAROD-Ports’ is a step to address such disputes through an alternative route to ensure faster resolution and in a cost-effective manner.

The SAROD mechanism has already been in place for some time in the road sector. The SAROD - Roads, comprises of members from NHAI and NHBF and has empanelled arbitrators. There are set rules, with regards to the number of arbitrators for a case, fees to be paid, provision for appointment of experts etc. The system was put in place to bring down the cost of arbitration and to ensure a faster resolution. Over the last few years, there has been a fair share of disputes between NHAI and private players being resolved through the mechanism and thereby reducing pendency and reducing the cost of arbitration.

ICRA notes that the initiative is targeted towards attracting more private sector investments and should be favourable for the sector if it is able to resolve disputes at low costs and in a time-bound manner. Mr Sai Krishna, Assistant Vice President and Associate Head, ICRA ratings mentioned said, “The port sector’s ability to attract investments will also be contingent on the resolution of policy issues which led to disputes in the first place. Further, while the government has announced several policy measures over the last few years, they are in various stages of implementation. Early implementation of the planned measures, the passage of important bills like “The Major Port Authorities Bill, 2019” which will allow more flexibility to Major Ports and timely execution of projects under Sagarmala initiatives will be crucial to attract additional private sector investments.” 

Image courtesy: PTI PhotoOn September 10, 2020, the Union Minister of Shipping, launched ‘SAROD-PORTS’ (Society for Affordable Redressal of Disputes – Ports) for dispute resolution in Maritime Sector, comprising of Major Ports, Non-Major Ports and PPP players operating at Major Ports. The launch of ‘SAROD-Ports’ is a much needed alternative step to resolve/reduce the disputes in the ports sector in less time and in a cost-effective manner. According to ICRA, this is a positive development for the sector. SAROD-Ports will consist of members from Indian Port Association (IPA) and Indian Private Ports and Terminal Association (IPPTA) and the empanelled arbitrators will comprise of retired chairman/deputy chairman of Major Port Trusts or retired or serving members of the Judiciary, Civil Servants, Public Sector undertakings who have experience in the port sector and arbitration process.Giving further insights, Mr K. Ravichandran, Senior Vice President and Group -Head, ICRA Ratings says, “The credit profile of several port sector entities has been impacted by large contingent liabilities arising from prolonged disputes and hence the launch of SAROD-Ports should be credit positive for the sector. However, the success of the mechanism remains to be seen, as it will depend on the willingness of existing concessionaires to opt for it. This should be more useful for disputes, where the quantum of liability is smaller and it will be prudent for both parties to settle in a speedy manner. Further, the provision to bring in experts in arbitration process should also be a favourable factor, as industry members have at times cited dissatisfaction with arbitrators not having sufficient understanding of the port sector”.In the last two decades, there has been increasing shift towards PPP projects and landlord port model by the Major Ports, where terminals for specific cargo segments are developed and operated by private players on BOT basis. However, in many cases there have been disputes with the Major Port Trust related to terms of concession including revenue share/royalty; the meeting of minimum guaranteed performance standards and volumes; facilities and maintenance work to be done by the Port Trust etc. apart from disputes with regulatory authorities like TAMP. These disputes in many instances have dragged on for several years, as the parties may first go for arbitration and then fight the cases in higher courts. This results in high arbitration and litigation costs for both the ports as well as the private players. The launch of ‘SAROD-Ports’ is a step to address such disputes through an alternative route to ensure faster resolution and in a cost-effective manner.The SAROD mechanism has already been in place for some time in the road sector. The SAROD - Roads, comprises of members from NHAI and NHBF and has empanelled arbitrators. There are set rules, with regards to the number of arbitrators for a case, fees to be paid, provision for appointment of experts etc. The system was put in place to bring down the cost of arbitration and to ensure a faster resolution. Over the last few years, there has been a fair share of disputes between NHAI and private players being resolved through the mechanism and thereby reducing pendency and reducing the cost of arbitration.ICRA notes that the initiative is targeted towards attracting more private sector investments and should be favourable for the sector if it is able to resolve disputes at low costs and in a time-bound manner. Mr Sai Krishna, Assistant Vice President and Associate Head, ICRA ratings mentioned said, “The port sector’s ability to attract investments will also be contingent on the resolution of policy issues which led to disputes in the first place. Further, while the government has announced several policy measures over the last few years, they are in various stages of implementation. Early implementation of the planned measures, the passage of important bills like “The Major Port Authorities Bill, 2019” which will allow more flexibility to Major Ports and timely execution of projects under Sagarmala initiatives will be crucial to attract additional private sector investments.” 

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?