Durability of Concrete Structures
Concrete

Durability of Concrete Structures

Reinforcement of steel in concrete enhances its tensile strength and helps sustain it against seismic activity. The most common material choice for reinforcement has been found to be steel. There are millions of buildings, structures and bridges that have been made using the combination of steel reinforcement in concrete.

In the 1990s, there was a sudden increase in the deterioration of RCC buildings, especially in coastal zones or cities with high humidity and pollution. This was immediately countered by using modified steels such as CRS steel with small additions of chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), vanadium (V) and titanium (Ti) as well as using coated steel bars. One of the most accepted technologies in the 1990s was the use of fusion bond epoxy coating on rebar because of its large tonnage production with high quality control. However, damage during handling and lower bond with concrete made has proved questionable in many sites, though none of the over 900 structures made have showed any distress to date.

Alternative technologies of TMT bars and stainless steel bars were adopted. Simultaneously, there was a demand for the enhancement of the life of structures to grow from 60 years to 120 years, and even 300 years. It became a dilemma to find out how a RCC structure would sustain for 120 years, or even 200-300 years, when present technologies assured only 30 to 60 years. In such a process, even after taking into account all concrete design possibilities of high-density concrete and longer cover thickness, the problem was how to remedy distress owing to corrosion. We then created a model of the life of a concrete structure based upon a fixed concrete design but varying reinforcing material, with and without coating, using inhibitors in admixture or using ultimate stainless steels as reinforcing bars.

About the author:
Professor AS Khanna, Chairman, SSPC India, retired as a professor from IIT-Bombay after 27 years of teaching and research, guiding 27 PhDs, 125 master’s and creating research expertise in high-temperature corrosion, coatings, surface engineering and corrosion of concrete structures. He has won several international awards such as the Humboldt Fellowship from Germany, the Royal Norwegian Fellowship and Fellowship of the Japan Key Centre, and has also worked as visiting professor in Germany and France. He is a coating expert and is associated with Hindustan Zinc for several assignments related to galvanization and its applications.

Click here to know more…

Reinforcement of steel in concrete enhances its tensile strength and helps sustain it against seismic activity. The most common material choice for reinforcement has been found to be steel. There are millions of buildings, structures and bridges that have been made using the combination of steel reinforcement in concrete. In the 1990s, there was a sudden increase in the deterioration of RCC buildings, especially in coastal zones or cities with high humidity and pollution. This was immediately countered by using modified steels such as CRS steel with small additions of chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), vanadium (V) and titanium (Ti) as well as using coated steel bars. One of the most accepted technologies in the 1990s was the use of fusion bond epoxy coating on rebar because of its large tonnage production with high quality control. However, damage during handling and lower bond with concrete made has proved questionable in many sites, though none of the over 900 structures made have showed any distress to date. Alternative technologies of TMT bars and stainless steel bars were adopted. Simultaneously, there was a demand for the enhancement of the life of structures to grow from 60 years to 120 years, and even 300 years. It became a dilemma to find out how a RCC structure would sustain for 120 years, or even 200-300 years, when present technologies assured only 30 to 60 years. In such a process, even after taking into account all concrete design possibilities of high-density concrete and longer cover thickness, the problem was how to remedy distress owing to corrosion. We then created a model of the life of a concrete structure based upon a fixed concrete design but varying reinforcing material, with and without coating, using inhibitors in admixture or using ultimate stainless steels as reinforcing bars. About the author: Professor AS Khanna, Chairman, SSPC India, retired as a professor from IIT-Bombay after 27 years of teaching and research, guiding 27 PhDs, 125 master’s and creating research expertise in high-temperature corrosion, coatings, surface engineering and corrosion of concrete structures. He has won several international awards such as the Humboldt Fellowship from Germany, the Royal Norwegian Fellowship and Fellowship of the Japan Key Centre, and has also worked as visiting professor in Germany and France. He is a coating expert and is associated with Hindustan Zinc for several assignments related to galvanization and its applications.Click here to know more…

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Delhi Airport to Finalise 20-Year Master Plan

Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) is finalising a 20-year master plan to guide long term infrastructure and operational development at Indira Gandhi International Airport, an official said. The operator expects the plan to reflect changes in the airline industry, shifts in the competitive landscape and evolving infrastructure requirements across terminals, airside and support services. The official said the document is likely to be ready in the next two to two-and-a-half months as the operator moves through planning stages. The plan will be prepared after consultations with airport users ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Aadhar Housing Finance Targets Rs 500 bn AUM By FY29

Aadhar Housing Finance has set a target to raise its asset under management to Rs 500 billion (bn) by the end of FY29, aiming to achieve this over the next three financial years through an 18-20 per cent loan growth trajectory. The firm focuses on the low-income segment with a ticket size of less than Rs 1.5 million (mn) and has relied on that segment to drive expansion. The company closed FY26 with an AUM of Rs 305.71 bn, reflecting the expansion in recent years, and it reported a net profit rise of 22 per cent to Rs 11.08 bn. Management indicated that gross non-performing assets stood at 1.0..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Government to Launch Coal Gasification Urea Policy

The government will unveil a coal gasification based policy for urea production within one month, aiming to promote the use of domestic coal feedstock in synthetic fertiliser manufacture. The move seeks to enhance self reliance in fertiliser supply and to provide an alternative route to natural gas based synthesis. Officials said the policy will set out technical standards, permitting norms and incentives for projects that adopt coal gasification technology. It will aim to attract investments from both public sector undertakings and private manufacturers. The scheme will address logistical and..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement