Revenue of road-building engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) companies is expected to de-grow 8-10 per cent this fiscal with the COVID-19 pandemic-driven lockdown severely curtailing activity.That compares with a 17 per cent growth between fiscals 2017 and 2020, shows an analysis of over 300 CRISIL-rated EPC companies with a rated debt of Rs.510 billion.  With lower awarding by the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) in the past two fiscals, revenue growth was expected to taper to some extent. However, this fiscal, the slowdown in execution owing to lockdown and the resultant labour shortage are expected to push revenue growth into negative territory.  “Typically, in EPC projects, maximum execution and billing are done in March,” says Sachin Gupta, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings. “However, the lockdown that began from March 22 halted work in the crucial last days of the last fiscal and has continued to do so this fiscal. The pickup in execution and mobilisation after the lifting of the lockdown will be gradual. The upshot would be revenue degrowing 8-10 per cent and margins for EPC companies being hit by ~200 bps in fiscal 2021.”Given the effects of the lockdown, these companies had no execution and hence no income in April, but had to meet their fixed costs that are primarily employee and establishment costs. These account for ~12 per cent of the topline. And with sites operating at ~50 per cent efficiency in most of May, too, it would mean operating margins would decline ~200 bps to around 12 per cent this fiscal.Operations are likely to stabilise after the monsoon as migrant workers return to project sites. The trajectory of recovery will thus depend on the time taken to contain the pandemic.That said, the slowdown is unlikely to materially impact the credit profiles of these companies, primarily because of their robust balance sheets. Efficient management of working capital and liquidity, though, will be key to tide over the current situation.To their credit, these companies have kept a check on their debt levels while pursuing growth. At a consolidated level, as on March 31, 2020, their capital structures were robust, with gearing at 0.5 time, compared with 0.80 time as on March 31, 2015. And despite incremental funding requirements of their underlying build-operate-transfer (BOT) and hybrid annuity model (HAM) projects, gearing is expected to remain healthy at 0.65 time as on March 31, 2021.The reasons for the low leverage are twofold. First, NHAI awards after 2015 have been predominantly through the EPC and HAM routes, entailing lower equity requirements given NHAI’s contribution to project cost. Second, divestment of road assets to infrastructure investment trusts (InvITs) and global equity funds have helped further improve the capital structure. The ensuing low leverage provides resilience in these times of subdued operating performance.“As much as 90 per cent of the debt of the 300 CRISIL-rated road EPC companies analysed has an investment-grade rating of BBB category and above,” says Sushmita Majumdar, Director, CRISIL Ratings. “Their order books remain strong at around 2.2x of their last year’s revenues. Liquidity is also stable, with bank limit utilisation averaging ~70 per cent. Even assuming the receivable cycle stretching by an additional 1-1.5 months, they are adequately placed to weather the current situation, thus keeping their credit profiles stable. But the remaining 10 per cent may see some credit pressure because of liquidity pressures.”Given this, the credit ratio (rating upgrades to downgrades) in this segment may slip below one time, a situation last seen in fiscal 2014. Efficient management of the balance sheet and adequate liquidity would be the monitorables, along with project sites returning to full efficiency levels after the monsoon.