Builders cannot ask for maintenance costs from buyers without OC

07 Feb 2022 CW Team

The apex consumer forum held that homebuyers would be liable to pay maintenance charges for their apartments only after the builder obtains occupancy certificate from the civic authority, and it is not appropriate for builders to demand it even though the home buyers start residing in their apartments after taking over the ownership.

It said if the builder fails to obtain OC then it means that the project is not yet finished and it would be viewed only as “paper possession” if the flat is handed over to the buyers. The NCDRC permitted a plea of a batch of 15 homebuyers from Benguluru led by Harinder Singh who was compelled by a builder to pay maintenance charges after taking control of their apartments without OC.Their lawyer Chandrachur Bhattacharya claimed before a bench of S M Kanitkar and Binoy Kumar that the buyers were forced to pay two years of maintenance in advance while taking control of the apartments for which the builder failed to obtain OC despite a delay of six years.

Opposing homebuyers’ plea, the builder VDB Whitefield Development Private Ltd argued that maintenance cost was being charged as it was providing all facilities to those who have shifted to their flats. It said that delay in the project was caused because of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it was the buyers who had forced it to give them physical ownership of their units without OC.

However, NCDRC was not convinced with the submission of the builders and permitted the plea of homebuyers by relying upon a recent judgment delivered by the Supreme Court in January and an earlier verdict of the Commission.

Image Source

Also read: Property costs likely to increase by 5-10% in 2022: Anarock

In a relief to homebuyers who are pushed to take possession and start living in their apartments without occupancy certificate (OC) due to delay on the part of builders to get all approvals from the authority, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) held that builders cannot ask for maintenance charge from the buyers without OC. The apex consumer forum held that homebuyers would be liable to pay maintenance charges for their apartments only after the builder obtains occupancy certificate from the civic authority, and it is not appropriate for builders to demand it even though the home buyers start residing in their apartments after taking over the ownership. It said if the builder fails to obtain OC then it means that the project is not yet finished and it would be viewed only as “paper possession” if the flat is handed over to the buyers. The NCDRC permitted a plea of a batch of 15 homebuyers from Benguluru led by Harinder Singh who was compelled by a builder to pay maintenance charges after taking control of their apartments without OC.Their lawyer Chandrachur Bhattacharya claimed before a bench of S M Kanitkar and Binoy Kumar that the buyers were forced to pay two years of maintenance in advance while taking control of the apartments for which the builder failed to obtain OC despite a delay of six years. Opposing homebuyers’ plea, the builder VDB Whitefield Development Private Ltd argued that maintenance cost was being charged as it was providing all facilities to those who have shifted to their flats. It said that delay in the project was caused because of the Covid-19 pandemic, and it was the buyers who had forced it to give them physical ownership of their units without OC. However, NCDRC was not convinced with the submission of the builders and permitted the plea of homebuyers by relying upon a recent judgment delivered by the Supreme Court in January and an earlier verdict of the Commission. Image Source Also read: Property costs likely to increase by 5-10% in 2022: Anarock

Infrastructure Urban

06 Jul 2026

ABS Marine Sees CRISIL Credit Rating Upgrade

ABS Marine Services has secured an upgrade to its long term and short term credit ratings from CRISIL, reflecting improved profitability and revenue growth through long term contracts. CRISIL moved the long term rating from BBB+/Stable to A-/Stable and revised the short term rating from A2 to A2+. The action signals strengthened financial metrics and operational resilience. The company benefited from durable client relationships with firms such as ONGC and Schlumberger. The rating decision followed stronger cash flows and an enlarged bank loan facility, which increased from Rs 3,705 million (m..

Infrastructure Transport

06 Jul 2026

Project BRAHMANK Marks 16 Years Of Strategic Roads In Arunachal

Project BRAHMANK is marking 16 years of work to establish strategic road and bridge links across Arunachal Pradesh, maintaining and developing 811 kilometres of roads and nearly 86 bridges that range from small culverts to large steel and arch bridges. These transport links are described as critical for ensuring year-round movement of defence personnel, equipment and essential supplies while improving everyday travel for people in remote villages. The project balances national security requirements with regional development by focusing on reliable access in challenging terrain. Notable enginee..

Infrastructure Transport

06 Jul 2026

Longleng CSOs Give One Week Ultimatum Over Two-Lane Highway

Civil society organisations (CSOs) in Longleng district have demanded immediate restoration of the deteriorating Changtongya–Longleng two-lane road and sought a detailed status report on the stalled construction within one week. The demand followed a consultative meeting convened under the Phom Peoples' Council (PPC) to discuss welfare and development concerns. PPC president YB Angam Phom said prolonged non-maintenance had caused hardship to commuters and affected transportation, local commerce and the district's development. The meeting urged authorities to undertake immediate restoration a..