Delays and vacancies at MahaRERA hamper justice for home buyers
Real Estate

Delays and vacancies at MahaRERA hamper justice for home buyers

Jayshree Sukhadia, a resident of Chira Bazaar, approached MahaRERA in October 2020 after facing issues with a project promoter in Neral. She alleged that the promoter demanded extra money and failed to refund her Rs 1.3 million, which she had paid as a down payment for a flat booked in 2017. The first hearing on Sukhadia's complaint took place in October 2021, a year after filing, and was referred to the conciliation forum. However, the attempt at conciliation failed in March 2022, and no further hearing date has been provided.

Sukhadia's case is not unique, as many other home buyers have been struggling to receive prompt justice. Out of the 21,274 cases filed with MahaRERA so far, 6,989 cases are either being heard or pending. While the regulatory body was established to address the concerns of harassed home buyers dealing with dishonest promoters, the delays in handling complaints have adversely affected the buyers. Consequently, some home buyers prefer filing complaints with the consumer court instead of MahaRERA.

The MahaRERA authorities attribute the delay in conducting hearings and resolving complaints to the vacant positions within the regulatory authority. Currently, only two members, including the chairman, are available to hear complaints, leading to a backlog. Despite protests and representations, the state government has not replaced the members whose terms have expired.

Anil Dsouza, secretary of the MahaRERA Bar Association, highlighted the significant difference in hearing dates between MahaRERA and other courts, with MahaRERA taking over a year to schedule the next hearing. Many matters are adjourned indefinitely without providing a future date. Dsouza questions the feasibility of operating with a reduced number of benches while the number of complaints continues to rise.

Around 300 new complaints are filed with MahaRERA each month, but the two existing benches are only able to dispose of a similar number of complaints. For the past two years, MahaRERA has had only two members in addition to the adjudicating members. Although the government attempted to appoint additional members, these appointments did not materialise for various reasons. The addition of just one member could alleviate the problem and address the backlog of complaints, according to a MahaRERA official.

Valsa Nair Singh, additional chief secretary of the housing department, did not respond to inquiries seeking comment.

Advocate Godfrey Pimenta from the Watchdog Foundation emphasised that Section 21 of the Real Estate (Regulatory and Development) Act, 2016, stipulates the appointment of a chairperson and at least two full-time members by the government. However, MahaRERA currently only has a chairperson and one member. The Adjudication Officer appointed under Section 71 of RERA cannot be considered for the required composition of members stated in Section 21 of RERA.

Also Read
DLF plans to launch projects worth Rs 200 bn in current fiscal
MahaRERA yet to address nearly 7,000 pending homebuyer cases


Jayshree Sukhadia, a resident of Chira Bazaar, approached MahaRERA in October 2020 after facing issues with a project promoter in Neral. She alleged that the promoter demanded extra money and failed to refund her Rs 1.3 million, which she had paid as a down payment for a flat booked in 2017. The first hearing on Sukhadia's complaint took place in October 2021, a year after filing, and was referred to the conciliation forum. However, the attempt at conciliation failed in March 2022, and no further hearing date has been provided. Sukhadia's case is not unique, as many other home buyers have been struggling to receive prompt justice. Out of the 21,274 cases filed with MahaRERA so far, 6,989 cases are either being heard or pending. While the regulatory body was established to address the concerns of harassed home buyers dealing with dishonest promoters, the delays in handling complaints have adversely affected the buyers. Consequently, some home buyers prefer filing complaints with the consumer court instead of MahaRERA. The MahaRERA authorities attribute the delay in conducting hearings and resolving complaints to the vacant positions within the regulatory authority. Currently, only two members, including the chairman, are available to hear complaints, leading to a backlog. Despite protests and representations, the state government has not replaced the members whose terms have expired. Anil Dsouza, secretary of the MahaRERA Bar Association, highlighted the significant difference in hearing dates between MahaRERA and other courts, with MahaRERA taking over a year to schedule the next hearing. Many matters are adjourned indefinitely without providing a future date. Dsouza questions the feasibility of operating with a reduced number of benches while the number of complaints continues to rise. Around 300 new complaints are filed with MahaRERA each month, but the two existing benches are only able to dispose of a similar number of complaints. For the past two years, MahaRERA has had only two members in addition to the adjudicating members. Although the government attempted to appoint additional members, these appointments did not materialise for various reasons. The addition of just one member could alleviate the problem and address the backlog of complaints, according to a MahaRERA official. Valsa Nair Singh, additional chief secretary of the housing department, did not respond to inquiries seeking comment. Advocate Godfrey Pimenta from the Watchdog Foundation emphasised that Section 21 of the Real Estate (Regulatory and Development) Act, 2016, stipulates the appointment of a chairperson and at least two full-time members by the government. However, MahaRERA currently only has a chairperson and one member. The Adjudication Officer appointed under Section 71 of RERA cannot be considered for the required composition of members stated in Section 21 of RERA. Also Read DLF plans to launch projects worth Rs 200 bn in current fiscalMahaRERA yet to address nearly 7,000 pending homebuyer cases

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Shivraj Chouhan Launches PMGSY IV and Announces Package for Madhya Pradesh

Union Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan launched the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY) IV at Bhairunda in Sehore district during the 25 year celebrations and announced a development package for Madhya Pradesh. The programme was organised by the Union Ministry of Rural Development and attended by Chief Minister Dr Mohan Yadav, ministers of state, state ministers, legislators and senior officials from the centre and the state. The minister said the central government under the Prime Minister is committed to strengthening rural livelihoods through improved connectivity, housing and women's in..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

DMR Engineering Reports FY 25-26 Financial Results

DMR Engineering reported its half year results for the financial year ended 31 March 2026 and published full year figures on a standalone basis. Standalone revenue from operations decreased by 2.01 per cent year-over-year to Rs 102.58 million (mn), while profit after tax declined by 43.94 per cent to nine point five six mn, leaving a profit after tax margin of nine point zero five per cent. Earnings per share stood at Rs zero point nine two, a fall of 44.71 per cent year-over-year. The company attributed part of the decline to one-off provisioning for bad debts and additional financing charges..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Atlanta Electricals Posts Strong FY26 Growth And Debt Free Finish

Atlanta Electricals reported audited consolidated results for the quarter and year ended 31 March 2026. The company recorded significant year-on-year revenue growth driven by capacity ramp-up at new facilities and higher utilisation at legacy plants. The announcement summarised operating improvements and strategic milestones achieved during the year. For Q4 the company reported revenue of Rs 7.48 bn and for FY26 revenue of Rs 18.52 bn, representing robust growth versus the prior year. EBITDA in Q4 was Rs. 1.49 bn and Rs. 3.44 bn for the full year, with margins expanding to 20 per cent in the q..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

-->