Delhi HC rejects PIL for demolishing alleged illegal construction
Real Estate

Delhi HC rejects PIL for demolishing alleged illegal construction

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking direction to demolish alleged illegal and unauthorised construction in the Okhla Industrial area, stating that the plea had been filed without adequate preparation. The court's decision came after the counsel for the concerned authority informed it that necessary permission had been granted to the owner of the properties involved to proceed with the construction.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora explained in a recent order that due to the petition being filed without sufficient investigation, the court was dismissing the public interest petition along with an application, and imposed costs of Rs 25,000 to be shared equally by the respondents, namely MCD and DDA, payable within four weeks.

The high court had been addressing a petition that requested directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), and Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) to demolish construction allegedly carried out illegally and without authorization by the owner of two properties in the Okhla Industrial area.

The petitioner, a woman, had argued that the land belonged to DSIIDC and stated that she had approached the authorities with a representation, urging them to take legal action against the owner. However, no action had been taken.

The counsel for the MCD presented to the court a letter from DSIIDC that granted permission to the owner for the construction work necessary to strengthen the structure. Additionally, the counsel provided a building plan and a certificate issued by the MCD regarding one of the properties.

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking direction to demolish alleged illegal and unauthorised construction in the Okhla Industrial area, stating that the plea had been filed without adequate preparation. The court's decision came after the counsel for the concerned authority informed it that necessary permission had been granted to the owner of the properties involved to proceed with the construction. The bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora explained in a recent order that due to the petition being filed without sufficient investigation, the court was dismissing the public interest petition along with an application, and imposed costs of Rs 25,000 to be shared equally by the respondents, namely MCD and DDA, payable within four weeks. The high court had been addressing a petition that requested directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), and Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) to demolish construction allegedly carried out illegally and without authorization by the owner of two properties in the Okhla Industrial area. The petitioner, a woman, had argued that the land belonged to DSIIDC and stated that she had approached the authorities with a representation, urging them to take legal action against the owner. However, no action had been taken. The counsel for the MCD presented to the court a letter from DSIIDC that granted permission to the owner for the construction work necessary to strengthen the structure. Additionally, the counsel provided a building plan and a certificate issued by the MCD regarding one of the properties.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

PG Electro Plast Posts Over 100% Profit Growth in FY25

PG Electroplast Limited (PGEL), a leading player in Electronic Manufacturing Services and plastic moulding, reported robust growth in its audited results for FY25. Consolidated revenues rose to Rs 48.70 billion, growing seventy-seven per cent year-on-year. Net profit surged one hundred and twelve per cent to Rs 2.91 billion, while EBITDA rose nearly eighty-nine per cent to Rs 5.19 billion.In Q4FY25, revenue touched Rs 19.10 billion, with net profit doubling to Rs 1.46 billion. The Board approved a final dividend of Rs 0.25 per share.PGEL’s product business recorded Rs 35.26 billion in r..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SRF Reports Strong Profit Surge with Broad-Based Business Gains

SRF Limited, a diversified chemical and industrial solutions company, reported a consolidated revenue of Rs 43.13 billion in the fourth quarter of FY25, rising from Rs 35.7 billion—a year-on-year growth of twenty-one per cent. Profit before tax grew by sixty per cent to Rs 7.07 billion, while earnings before interest and tax rose by forty-seven per cent to Rs 9.06 billion. Net profit stood at Rs 5.26 billion.The Chemicals Business led the performance with Rs 23.55 billion in revenue, up thirty per cent. Its operating profit reached Rs 7.48 billion. Fluorochemicals saw record domestic refrige..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Fusion Finance’s Rs 8 Bn Rights Issue Subscribed 1.5 Times

Fusion Finance Limited, a leading Non-Banking Financial Company-Microfinance Institution (NBFC-MFI), has successfully concluded its partly paid-up rights issue, raising Rs eight billion. Launched on fifteen April twenty twenty-five, the issue was subscribed 1.5 times, demonstrating strong support from institutional investors.The issue included over sixty-one million partly paid-up equity shares priced at Rs 131 per share, with a premium of Rs 121. The funds will enhance capital adequacy and reinforce Fusion’s position as one of India’s most well-capitalised microfinance institutions.The co..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?