Delhi HC rejects PIL for demolishing alleged illegal construction
Real Estate

Delhi HC rejects PIL for demolishing alleged illegal construction

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking direction to demolish alleged illegal and unauthorised construction in the Okhla Industrial area, stating that the plea had been filed without adequate preparation. The court's decision came after the counsel for the concerned authority informed it that necessary permission had been granted to the owner of the properties involved to proceed with the construction.

The bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora explained in a recent order that due to the petition being filed without sufficient investigation, the court was dismissing the public interest petition along with an application, and imposed costs of Rs 25,000 to be shared equally by the respondents, namely MCD and DDA, payable within four weeks.

The high court had been addressing a petition that requested directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), and Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) to demolish construction allegedly carried out illegally and without authorization by the owner of two properties in the Okhla Industrial area.

The petitioner, a woman, had argued that the land belonged to DSIIDC and stated that she had approached the authorities with a representation, urging them to take legal action against the owner. However, no action had been taken.

The counsel for the MCD presented to the court a letter from DSIIDC that granted permission to the owner for the construction work necessary to strengthen the structure. Additionally, the counsel provided a building plan and a certificate issued by the MCD regarding one of the properties.

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL seeking direction to demolish alleged illegal and unauthorised construction in the Okhla Industrial area, stating that the plea had been filed without adequate preparation. The court's decision came after the counsel for the concerned authority informed it that necessary permission had been granted to the owner of the properties involved to proceed with the construction. The bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Manmeet PS Arora explained in a recent order that due to the petition being filed without sufficient investigation, the court was dismissing the public interest petition along with an application, and imposed costs of Rs 25,000 to be shared equally by the respondents, namely MCD and DDA, payable within four weeks. The high court had been addressing a petition that requested directions to the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Delhi Development Authority (DDA), and Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (DSIIDC) to demolish construction allegedly carried out illegally and without authorization by the owner of two properties in the Okhla Industrial area. The petitioner, a woman, had argued that the land belonged to DSIIDC and stated that she had approached the authorities with a representation, urging them to take legal action against the owner. However, no action had been taken. The counsel for the MCD presented to the court a letter from DSIIDC that granted permission to the owner for the construction work necessary to strengthen the structure. Additionally, the counsel provided a building plan and a certificate issued by the MCD regarding one of the properties.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code