+
SC stays criminal proceedings against Oberoi Realty's chairman
Real Estate

SC stays criminal proceedings against Oberoi Realty's chairman

In a FIR filed against high-ranking officials, including Lalit Goyal, the managing director of IREO Group, and Vikas Oberoi, the chairman and managing director of Oberoi Realty, the Supreme Court has halted further proceedings under different sections of cheating, criminal breach of trust, and forgery. The vacation bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and Augustine George Masih, while seeking responses from the Haryana police and others, noted that the second complaint against IREO and Oberoi officials had been filed without disclosing the earlier complaint, which pertained to the purportedly forged letter dated September 9, 2022, by the complainant Chandan Singh. The bench emphasised that the second complaint did not mention this letter, despite its relevance. The Supreme Court raised concerns about whether filing the second complaint constituted an abuse of process and whether the complainant had approached the Court with unclean hands, scheduling a further hearing for July 29. The IREO and Oberoi groups challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court?s decision to uphold the FIR registration, asserting that Singh, representing Advance India Projects (AIPL), had failed to disclose the first criminal proceeding where relief was not granted and subsequently filed a second complaint at a different police station. IREO, through its counsel, Nikhil Jain, stated in its appeal that the High Court's order reflected a skewed perspective favouring the complainant and misconstruing both factual and legal aspects. The FIR was lodged following a complaint by AIPL, alleging conspiracy by the realty groups to defraud allottees who had invested in projects since 2013. IREO had entered into an MoU with AIPL in 2021 for a housing project in Gurugram's Sector 58, but terminated the agreement in 2022 due to alleged non-payment by AIPL. Subsequently, AIPL filed a suit claiming the MoU was still valid, and later lodged a complaint accusing IREO and Oberoi officials of forging documents. The trial court dismissed this initial complaint. AIPL, represented by Singh, then filed a second complaint seeking FIR registration against IREO and Oberoi officials in another Gurugram court, a plea that was granted and later upheld by the High Court. The police subsequently filed an FIR on June 7 against several individuals, including top executives from both real estate firms, based on AIPL's allegations of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds. This sequence of events highlights the complex legal and procedural issues surrounding the dispute between AIPL and the real estate companies, now subject to scrutiny by the Supreme Court.

In a FIR filed against high-ranking officials, including Lalit Goyal, the managing director of IREO Group, and Vikas Oberoi, the chairman and managing director of Oberoi Realty, the Supreme Court has halted further proceedings under different sections of cheating, criminal breach of trust, and forgery. The vacation bench, comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and Augustine George Masih, while seeking responses from the Haryana police and others, noted that the second complaint against IREO and Oberoi officials had been filed without disclosing the earlier complaint, which pertained to the purportedly forged letter dated September 9, 2022, by the complainant Chandan Singh. The bench emphasised that the second complaint did not mention this letter, despite its relevance. The Supreme Court raised concerns about whether filing the second complaint constituted an abuse of process and whether the complainant had approached the Court with unclean hands, scheduling a further hearing for July 29. The IREO and Oberoi groups challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court?s decision to uphold the FIR registration, asserting that Singh, representing Advance India Projects (AIPL), had failed to disclose the first criminal proceeding where relief was not granted and subsequently filed a second complaint at a different police station. IREO, through its counsel, Nikhil Jain, stated in its appeal that the High Court's order reflected a skewed perspective favouring the complainant and misconstruing both factual and legal aspects. The FIR was lodged following a complaint by AIPL, alleging conspiracy by the realty groups to defraud allottees who had invested in projects since 2013. IREO had entered into an MoU with AIPL in 2021 for a housing project in Gurugram's Sector 58, but terminated the agreement in 2022 due to alleged non-payment by AIPL. Subsequently, AIPL filed a suit claiming the MoU was still valid, and later lodged a complaint accusing IREO and Oberoi officials of forging documents. The trial court dismissed this initial complaint. AIPL, represented by Singh, then filed a second complaint seeking FIR registration against IREO and Oberoi officials in another Gurugram court, a plea that was granted and later upheld by the High Court. The police subsequently filed an FIR on June 7 against several individuals, including top executives from both real estate firms, based on AIPL's allegations of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds. This sequence of events highlights the complex legal and procedural issues surrounding the dispute between AIPL and the real estate companies, now subject to scrutiny by the Supreme Court.

Next Story
Real Estate

No glass boxes!

India is moving away from the ‘glass box’ syndrome, all-glass façades that were widely used in commercial buildings in the last two decades but came at a significant environmental cost given the country’s predominantly hot and humid climate. Poor thermal performance, excessive heat gain and dependency on mechanical cooling systems made buildings with glass façades energy guzzlers and significantly increased their carbon footprint.That said, it’s important to be aware that “glass is not the enemy,” points out Heena Bhargava, Architect, Architecture Discipline. “How it ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Why do pavements fail?

India’s highways continue to expand at a healthy pace. But conversations on the surface quality of highways are growing louder because major deficiencies and black spots continue to be identified, and they are cause for concern.“Road surface roughness causes vehicle vibrations that, in turn, can affect the performance of drivers,” explains Dr V K Gahlot, Road Safety Auditor, Centre for Research and Sustainable Development (CfRSD). “Continuous exposure may induce fatigue, a contributory factor to road accidents. Road surface roughness also affects the vehicle operating cost...

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

APAC Logistics Rents Fall for First Time Since 2020

Logistics rents across the Asia-Pacific region declined 0.4% year-on-year in H1 2025, marking the first annual drop since 2020, according to Knight Frank’s Logistics Highlights H1 2025 report. Despite global trade tensions and cautious occupier sentiment, India emerged as a standout performer, driven by robust manufacturing momentum and supply chain recalibration.Regional Trends and DivergenceWhile rents largely remained stable across most markets, regional differences became more pronounced:Mainland China continued to see rental declines, though the pace of decline moderated to 12.8% YoY, s..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?