UP Govt Plans SOPs for Township Handover
Real Estate

UP Govt Plans SOPs for Township Handover

The Uttar Pradesh government is preparing standard operating procedures (SOPs) to streamline the transfer of townships from private developers or development authorities to local civic bodies. The move aims to eliminate delays and disputes that leave residents grappling with poor maintenance and double taxation.

A state-level meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, where officials from municipal corporations and development authorities of Ghaziabad, Kanpur, and Lucknow will discuss recommendations.

According to Rajendra Tyagi, a five-time councillor with the Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation (GMC), private developers often exploit regulatory loopholes to delay handovers, charging exorbitant maintenance fees from homebuyers. ""Maintenance costs under developers are far higher than municipal taxes for water, sewerage, and house tax,"" Tyagi stated, adding that residents are sometimes forced to pay both municipal taxes and developers' fees.

GMC Chief Engineer NK Choudhary confirmed that the state government has requested suggestions, which will guide the formation of a committee to draft rules ensuring seamless handovers.

Persistent Delays in Ghaziabad

In Ghaziabad, six townships, including Madhuban Bapudham and Swarnjyantipuram, developed by the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA), have awaited handover to GMC for over two decades. Privately developed townships like Raj Nagar Extension and Wave City also face prolonged delays.

The Indirapuram township case highlights the challenges in such transfers. Spread across 1,222 acres, its handover dragged on since 2016 over disagreements between GDA and GMC on infrastructure costs. The dispute was resolved in October this year when GDA paid Rs 700 million to GMC for infrastructure upgrades.

Resident Ashwini Shastri from Indirapuram criticized the prolonged process, saying, ""Notices for house tax arrears of over 10 years have been issued despite GDA managing water and sewerage for 25 years. The lack of clarity in the handover process has resulted in unfair practices.""

Path Forward

The proposed SOPs aim to:

Set clear timelines for handovers.

Resolve disputes over incomplete work and funding.

Protect residents from unfair maintenance charges and double taxation.

By addressing these issues, the UP government seeks to uphold residents' rights while ensuring accountability among developers and authorities.

The Uttar Pradesh government is preparing standard operating procedures (SOPs) to streamline the transfer of townships from private developers or development authorities to local civic bodies. The move aims to eliminate delays and disputes that leave residents grappling with poor maintenance and double taxation.A state-level meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, where officials from municipal corporations and development authorities of Ghaziabad, Kanpur, and Lucknow will discuss recommendations.According to Rajendra Tyagi, a five-time councillor with the Ghaziabad Municipal Corporation (GMC), private developers often exploit regulatory loopholes to delay handovers, charging exorbitant maintenance fees from homebuyers. Maintenance costs under developers are far higher than municipal taxes for water, sewerage, and house tax, Tyagi stated, adding that residents are sometimes forced to pay both municipal taxes and developers' fees.GMC Chief Engineer NK Choudhary confirmed that the state government has requested suggestions, which will guide the formation of a committee to draft rules ensuring seamless handovers.Persistent Delays in GhaziabadIn Ghaziabad, six townships, including Madhuban Bapudham and Swarnjyantipuram, developed by the Ghaziabad Development Authority (GDA), have awaited handover to GMC for over two decades. Privately developed townships like Raj Nagar Extension and Wave City also face prolonged delays.The Indirapuram township case highlights the challenges in such transfers. Spread across 1,222 acres, its handover dragged on since 2016 over disagreements between GDA and GMC on infrastructure costs. The dispute was resolved in October this year when GDA paid Rs 700 million to GMC for infrastructure upgrades.Resident Ashwini Shastri from Indirapuram criticized the prolonged process, saying, Notices for house tax arrears of over 10 years have been issued despite GDA managing water and sewerage for 25 years. The lack of clarity in the handover process has resulted in unfair practices.Path ForwardThe proposed SOPs aim to:Set clear timelines for handovers.Resolve disputes over incomplete work and funding.Protect residents from unfair maintenance charges and double taxation.By addressing these issues, the UP government seeks to uphold residents' rights while ensuring accountability among developers and authorities.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?