Infra projects show huge cost overruns
ECONOMY & POLICY

Infra projects show huge cost overruns

As per recent reports, 437 infrastructure projects, each worth Rs 1.50 billion or more have been adversely affected due to cost overruns, amounting to over Rs 4.37 trillion. Of 1,663 such projects, 531 projects witnessed time escalation, and 437 projects have reported cost overruns. Cost overrun quantum. The incurred expenditure on the projects stood at Rs 11.62 trillion till September, which was 45.60% of the expected cost.

All infrastructure projects worth Rs 1.50 billion and above are monitored by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI). The Ministry's latest report for September 2020 reported that the original cumulative cost for the 1,663 projects was Rs 21.09 trillion. However, the anticipated cost of completion of the projects is probably going to be Rs 25.47 trillion. The overall cost overruns indicated by this is of Rs 4.37 trillion, which is more than 20 per cent of the initially calculated cost.

However, the report said that if the delay is assessed based on the latest schedule of completion, the number of delayed projects reduces to 430.

The report also mentioned that neither the tentative gestation period nor the year of commissioning was reported for 924 projects.

Time overruns quantum. Of the 531 projects that have been delayed, 121 projects reflect a delay of 61 months and more; 160 projects show a delay of any duration between 25 to 60 months; 128 projects reflect a delay in the range of 13-24 months; while 122 projects show an overall delay from anywhere between 1-12 months. The average time overrun in all the 531 projects is 43.89 months.

Several project-implementing agencies reported various reasons for the time overruns. The reasons varied from delay in acquiring environment and forest clearances, a delay in acquisition of land or even a lack of linkages and infrastructural support.

The report mentioned tendering delays, delay in ordering and supplying of equipment, delay in finalisation of detailed engineering, delays in project financing tie-ups and issues with law and order as some of the other reasons.

The report also stated that project agencies are not reporting revised cost estimates and commissioning schedules for many projects, which suggests that time and cost overrun figures are under-reported.

As per recent reports, 437 infrastructure projects, each worth Rs 1.50 billion or more have been adversely affected due to cost overruns, amounting to over Rs 4.37 trillion. Of 1,663 such projects, 531 projects witnessed time escalation, and 437 projects have reported cost overruns. Cost overrun quantum. The incurred expenditure on the projects stood at Rs 11.62 trillion till September, which was 45.60% of the expected cost. All infrastructure projects worth Rs 1.50 billion and above are monitored by the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation (MoSPI). The Ministry's latest report for September 2020 reported that the original cumulative cost for the 1,663 projects was Rs 21.09 trillion. However, the anticipated cost of completion of the projects is probably going to be Rs 25.47 trillion. The overall cost overruns indicated by this is of Rs 4.37 trillion, which is more than 20 per cent of the initially calculated cost. However, the report said that if the delay is assessed based on the latest schedule of completion, the number of delayed projects reduces to 430. The report also mentioned that neither the tentative gestation period nor the year of commissioning was reported for 924 projects. Time overruns quantum. Of the 531 projects that have been delayed, 121 projects reflect a delay of 61 months and more; 160 projects show a delay of any duration between 25 to 60 months; 128 projects reflect a delay in the range of 13-24 months; while 122 projects show an overall delay from anywhere between 1-12 months. The average time overrun in all the 531 projects is 43.89 months. Several project-implementing agencies reported various reasons for the time overruns. The reasons varied from delay in acquiring environment and forest clearances, a delay in acquisition of land or even a lack of linkages and infrastructural support. The report mentioned tendering delays, delay in ordering and supplying of equipment, delay in finalisation of detailed engineering, delays in project financing tie-ups and issues with law and order as some of the other reasons. The report also stated that project agencies are not reporting revised cost estimates and commissioning schedules for many projects, which suggests that time and cost overrun figures are under-reported.

Next Story
Technology

Building Faster, Smarter, and Greener!

Backed by ULCCS’s century-old legacy, U-Sphere combines technology, modular design and sustainable practices to deliver faster and more efficient projects. In an interaction with CW, Rohit Prabhakar, Director - Business Development, shares how the company’s integrated model of ‘Speed-Build’, ‘Smart-Build’ and ‘Sustain-Build’ is redefining construction efficiency, quality and environmental responsibility in India.U-Sphere positions itself at the intersection of speed, sustainability and smart design. How does this translate into measurable efficiency on the ground?At U..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Smart Roads, Smarter India

India’s infrastructure boom is not only about laying more kilometres of highways – it’s about building them smarter, safer and more sustainably. From drones mapping fragile Himalayan slopes to 3D machine-controlled graders reducing human error, technology is steadily reshaping the way projects are planned and executed. Yet, the journey towards digitisation remains complex, demanding not just capital but also coordination, training and vision.Until recently, engineers largely depended on Survey of India toposheets and traditional survey methods like total stations or DGPS to prepare detai..

Next Story
Real Estate

What Does DCPR 2034 Mean?

The Maharashtra government has eased approval norms for high-rise buildings under DCPR 2034, enabling the municipal commissioner to sanction projects up to 180 m on large plots. This change is expected to streamline approvals, reduce procedural delays and accelerate redevelopment, drawing reactions from developers, planners and industry experts about its implications for Mumbai’s vertical growth.Under the revised DCPR 2034 rules, buildings on plots of 2,000 sq m or more can now be approved up to 180 m by the municipal commissioner, provided structural and geotechnical reports are certified b..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?