DGGI pursues increased GST from auto part manufacturers

06 Jul 2023 CW Team

The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) has sent notices to at least 17 companies in the past 45 days, amounting to a total tax demand of over Rs 12 billion. Officials have indicated that more notices will be sent, potentially increasing the amount further. The higher tax demands are in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Westinghouse Saxby Farmer. The court stated that parts exclusively used in the automobile industry should be subject to a higher tax rate, emphasizing the need for consistency in taxation principles between industries.

The companies affected by the tax demands are manufacturers of various automotive components, including engines, horns, locks, lights, sensing devices, valves, switch panels, LCD screens used in dashboard displays, oil seals, and other electronic components.

Although these manufacturers have been paying goods and services tax (GST) on the parts at a lower rate, typically 18%, the tax authorities argue that a rate of 28% should apply. They justify this based on the GST Law, which specifies the 28% rate for "parts and accessories of motor vehicles."

The component manufacturers have received demand notices for the differential amount, along with interest. Some of these companies are now considering challenging these notices in court.

The classification dispute stems from a 2021 Supreme Court judgement involving Westinghouse Saxby Farmer, a manufacturer of relay systems used in railway signalling. The company had classified the relays it produced as part of railway equipment, which attracted a lower tax rate. It contended that since the parts were exclusively manufactured for use in railways, they should be classified accordingly.

However, the authorities sought a reclassification of the product, resulting in higher taxation.

Also read:
KEC bags new orders worth Rs 1,042 cr
15km pod taxi corridor in Noida up for grabs

Several automotive component manufacturers have been issued higher tax demands by the goods and services tax authorities. The basis for these demands is a Supreme Court judgement related to a company owned by the West Bengal government. The Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (DGGI) has sent notices to at least 17 companies in the past 45 days, amounting to a total tax demand of over Rs 12 billion. Officials have indicated that more notices will be sent, potentially increasing the amount further. The higher tax demands are in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in the case of Westinghouse Saxby Farmer. The court stated that parts exclusively used in the automobile industry should be subject to a higher tax rate, emphasizing the need for consistency in taxation principles between industries. The companies affected by the tax demands are manufacturers of various automotive components, including engines, horns, locks, lights, sensing devices, valves, switch panels, LCD screens used in dashboard displays, oil seals, and other electronic components. Although these manufacturers have been paying goods and services tax (GST) on the parts at a lower rate, typically 18%, the tax authorities argue that a rate of 28% should apply. They justify this based on the GST Law, which specifies the 28% rate for parts and accessories of motor vehicles. The component manufacturers have received demand notices for the differential amount, along with interest. Some of these companies are now considering challenging these notices in court. The classification dispute stems from a 2021 Supreme Court judgement involving Westinghouse Saxby Farmer, a manufacturer of relay systems used in railway signalling. The company had classified the relays it produced as part of railway equipment, which attracted a lower tax rate. It contended that since the parts were exclusively manufactured for use in railways, they should be classified accordingly. However, the authorities sought a reclassification of the product, resulting in higher taxation. Also read: KEC bags new orders worth Rs 1,042 cr 15km pod taxi corridor in Noida up for grabs

Building Material

18 Sep 2025

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Technology

18 Sep 2025

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Infrastructure Urban

18 Sep 2025

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..