Indian vs. overseas brands

01 Mar 2019 CW Staff

Indian brands of earthmoving equipment are making inroads in the market but still don’t measure up to machines from global brands like CAT, Wirtgen and Vogele, says Pramod Joshi, DGM, P&M Operation, JMC Projects India. “Machines from overseas brands are more expensive to buy but make up in higher productivity and lower maintenance cost, besides performing more accurately.”

“We are engaged in reputed four to eight lane expressway projects that need heavy and quality machines,” says Ashim Paul, Plant & Machinery Head, Adani Transport. “We usually prefer compactors, pavers, graders and excavators from global brands as they are more accurate, productive and meet the NHAI codes specified for equipment.”

“The lack of quality of products made in India relevant for the requirement has led to demand for foreign alternatives, Chinese or Italian machines that can fit contractors’ ROI target,” agrees Manish Arora, Business Head, Mahindra Construction Equipment.

With many global brands now manufacturing in India, it isn’t as if using a global brand implies using an imported machine. Nischal Mehrotra, Director, Sales & Marketing, LiuGong India tells us that imported construction machines form a minuscule amount of all machines in use: “Primarily, motor graders and higher tonnage excavators are being imported.”

So, what needs to be done to build world-class Indian construction equipment brands?

Joshi believes Indian companies need to be driven by quality over quantity and focus on R&D to compete with global manufacturers. He cites the example of asphalt pavers—“India is still nowhere in that segment; we need to develop a world-class machine.”

“Government incentives to the sector may help improve the quality of machines,” believes Joshi.

Additionally, he also sees scope for the Government to support Indian brands. “To some extent, the Government is furthering the use of equipment from global brands by specifying (in tenders) the use of machines with built-in sensors; and rightly so because they perform better,” he says. “To incentivise domestic companies, the Government must insist on the use of Indian equipment for all projects.”

- CHARU BAHRI

Indian brands of earthmoving equipment are making inroads in the market but still don’t measure up to machines from global brands like CAT, Wirtgen and Vogele, says Pramod Joshi, DGM, P&M Operation, JMC Projects India. “Machines from overseas brands are more expensive to buy but make up in higher productivity and lower maintenance cost, besides performing more accurately.”“We are engaged in reputed four to eight lane expressway projects that need heavy and quality machines,” says Ashim Paul, Plant & Machinery Head, Adani Transport. “We usually prefer compactors, pavers, graders and excavators from global brands as they are more accurate, productive and meet the NHAI codes specified for equipment.”“The lack of quality of products made in India relevant for the requirement has led to demand for foreign alternatives, Chinese or Italian machines that can fit contractors’ ROI target,” agrees Manish Arora, Business Head, Mahindra Construction Equipment.With many global brands now manufacturing in India, it isn’t as if using a global brand implies using an imported machine. Nischal Mehrotra, Director, Sales & Marketing, LiuGong India tells us that imported construction machines form a minuscule amount of all machines in use: “Primarily, motor graders and higher tonnage excavators are being imported.”So, what needs to be done to build world-class Indian construction equipment brands?Joshi believes Indian companies need to be driven by quality over quantity and focus on R&D to compete with global manufacturers. He cites the example of asphalt pavers—“India is still nowhere in that segment; we need to develop a world-class machine.” “Government incentives to the sector may help improve the quality of machines,” believes Joshi.Additionally, he also sees scope for the Government to support Indian brands. “To some extent, the Government is furthering the use of equipment from global brands by specifying (in tenders) the use of machines with built-in sensors; and rightly so because they perform better,” he says. “To incentivise domestic companies, the Government must insist on the use of Indian equipment for all projects.”- CHARU BAHRI

Infrastructure Transport

06 Feb 2026

Lucknow Metro East-West Corridor Consultancy Contract Awarded

The Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has awarded the first construction-related consultancy contract for the Lucknow Metro East West Corridor to a joint venture of AYESA Ingenieria Arquitectura SAU and AYESA India Pvt Ltd. The firm was declared the lowest bidder for the Detailed Design Consultant contract for Lucknow Metro Line-2 under Phase 1B and the contract was recommended following the financial bid. The contract is valued at Rs 159.0 million (mn), covering design services for the corridor. Lucknow Metro Line-2 envisages the construction of an 11.165 kilometre corridor connecting Cha..

Infrastructure Urban

06 Feb 2026

Div Com Kashmir Urges Fast Tracking Of Jhelum Water Transport Project

The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir has called for the fast-tracking of the Jhelum water transport project, urging district administrations and relevant agencies to accelerate planning and clearances. In a meeting convened at the divisional headquarters, the commissioner instructed officials from irrigation, public health engineering and municipal departments to prioritise the project and coordinate survey and design work. The directive emphasised removal of administrative bottlenecks and close monitoring to ensure timely mobilisation of resources and contractors. Officials were told to in..

Infrastructure Urban

06 Feb 2026

Interarch Reports Strong Q3 And Nine Month Results

Interarch Building Solutions Limited reported unaudited results for the third quarter and nine months ended 31 December 2025, recording strong revenue growth driven by execution and a robust order book. Net revenue for the third quarter rose by 43.7 per cent to Rs 5.225 billion (bn), compared with Rs 3.636 bn a year earlier, reflecting heightened demand in pre-engineered building projects. The company’s total order book as at 31 January 2026 stood at Rs 16.85 bn, supporting near-term visibility. EBITDA excluding other income for the quarter increased by 43.2 per cent to Rs 503 million (mn),..