SC grants DMRC Rs 8,000 cr relief in Delhi Airport Metro case
RAILWAYS & METRO RAIL

SC grants DMRC Rs 8,000 cr relief in Delhi Airport Metro case

In a significant development for the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC), the Supreme Court granted relief worth ?8,000 crore in the ongoing dispute concerning the Delhi Airport Metro Express line. The apex court's decision provides a substantial financial respite for the DMRC, offering a breather amidst the legal battle.

The dispute originated from the termination of the concessionaire agreement between DMRC and the Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL) in 2012 due to operational issues. DAMEPL, a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure, had cited technical glitches and sought compensation for losses incurred.

Following prolonged legal proceedings, the Supreme Court's bench comprising Justices UU Lalit and S Ravindra Bhat evaluated the matter and ruled in favor of DMRC. The court upheld DMRC's appeal against the arbitral award of ?8,000 crore to DAMEPL, asserting that the compensation was unjustified.

The apex court's verdict provides relief to DMRC, which had been burdened with the prospect of hefty financial compensation. The decision is also expected to have broader implications for similar disputes involving public-private partnership projects in India's infrastructure sector.

The Delhi Airport Metro Express line, connecting New Delhi's city center with the Indira Gandhi International Airport, is a crucial transportation link catering to millions of passengers annually. Ensuring its smooth operation is essential for the capital's transportation infrastructure and the convenience of commuters.

The resolution of this long-standing dispute brings clarity and stability to the operations of the Delhi Airport Metro Express line, fostering confidence among stakeholders and facilitating the continued provision of efficient metro services in the national capital region.

The Supreme Court's verdict underscores the importance of legal clarity and fair arbitration in resolving complex disputes within the realm of infrastructure development. It serves as a reminder of the need for robust contractual frameworks and effective dispute resolution mechanisms to safeguard the interests of all parties involved in large-scale infrastructure projects.

In a significant development for the Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC), the Supreme Court granted relief worth ?8,000 crore in the ongoing dispute concerning the Delhi Airport Metro Express line. The apex court's decision provides a substantial financial respite for the DMRC, offering a breather amidst the legal battle. The dispute originated from the termination of the concessionaire agreement between DMRC and the Delhi Airport Metro Express Private Limited (DAMEPL) in 2012 due to operational issues. DAMEPL, a subsidiary of Reliance Infrastructure, had cited technical glitches and sought compensation for losses incurred. Following prolonged legal proceedings, the Supreme Court's bench comprising Justices UU Lalit and S Ravindra Bhat evaluated the matter and ruled in favor of DMRC. The court upheld DMRC's appeal against the arbitral award of ?8,000 crore to DAMEPL, asserting that the compensation was unjustified. The apex court's verdict provides relief to DMRC, which had been burdened with the prospect of hefty financial compensation. The decision is also expected to have broader implications for similar disputes involving public-private partnership projects in India's infrastructure sector. The Delhi Airport Metro Express line, connecting New Delhi's city center with the Indira Gandhi International Airport, is a crucial transportation link catering to millions of passengers annually. Ensuring its smooth operation is essential for the capital's transportation infrastructure and the convenience of commuters. The resolution of this long-standing dispute brings clarity and stability to the operations of the Delhi Airport Metro Express line, fostering confidence among stakeholders and facilitating the continued provision of efficient metro services in the national capital region. The Supreme Court's verdict underscores the importance of legal clarity and fair arbitration in resolving complex disputes within the realm of infrastructure development. It serves as a reminder of the need for robust contractual frameworks and effective dispute resolution mechanisms to safeguard the interests of all parties involved in large-scale infrastructure projects.

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Cabinet Approves Key Highway and Rail Projects in Bihar Region

The Union Cabinet on Wednesday approved the four-laning of the 84.2-km Mokama-Munger section of the Buxar-Bhagalpur high-speed corridor, a key industrial region in poll-bound Bihar. The Cabinet also sanctioned the doubling of the 177-km Bhagalpur-Dumka-Rampurhat railway line, which passes through Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal, at a cost of Rs 31.7 billion.The Rs 44.5 billion highway project will be constructed under the hybrid annuity model, a variant of public-private partnership. The Mokama-Munger stretch was the only remaining two-lane section of the 363-km Buxar-Bhagalpur corridor. Fou..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

NGT Issues Notice on Bengaluru Twin Tunnel Project

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Wednesday issued notices in response to a petition filed by Bengaluru Praja Vedike and others, challenging the Bengaluru twin tunnel road project. Petitioners claim the project was “hastily announced” and bypassed mandatory environmental impact assessment procedures.Notices have been served to the Karnataka Government, Greater Bengaluru Authority, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Bengaluru Smart Infrastructure Ltd (B-SMILE), the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and project consultants.The 16.74-km twin-tube..

Next Story
Real Estate

India’s Residential Sales to Dip Slightly in FY26

Residential sales in India’s seven major cities are projected to decline by up to 3 per cent year-on-year in FY26 to 620–640 million square feet (msf), amid a moderation in sales velocity, according to ratings agency Icra.In FY25, sales stood at 643 msf, down 8 per cent YoY, following a sharp contraction in new launches and moderated demand in the affordable and mid-income segments. This slowdown came after the sector posted a robust compound annual growth rate of 26 per cent in area sales between FY22 and FY24.Icra noted: “Having seen a strong upcycle, the sector entered an equilibrium ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?