Shipping Corp?s to buy six Rs 20 billion second-hand ships
PORTS & SHIPPING

Shipping Corp?s to buy six Rs 20 billion second-hand ships

The state-run Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. (SCI) has received a "poor response" to its plan to purchase six used ships of various types for a budget exceeding Rs 20 billion through tenders, according to multiple sources, as very few fleet owners have lined up to offer their ships in a booming freight market. Crucially, a person with knowledge of the tender stated that the national carrier did not receive any offers for the purchase of a fifteen-year-old, 9,000?12,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) capacity container ship. This is because the Red Sea crisis forced owners to reroute their box ships via the longer Cape of Good Hope rather than the shorter Suez Canal route in order to avoid attacks by Houthi militants backed by Yemen. Ship rerouting has resulted in more sailing days for the journey, requiring more ships to be deployed on services, soaking up extra capacity.

The only part to generate a "decent" reaction was the 15-year-old very large gas carrier (VLGC) with a capacity to transport 79,000?84,000 cubic metres of LPG. SCI got "half a dozen" proposals for the vessel. The bids were "nothing much" to write home about for a 15-year-old medium-range (MR) product tanker with a 46,000?52,000 dead weight tonne (dwt) capacity. Additionally, SCI has invited bids for a 10-year-old tug supply vessel that can handle anchors (a domestic tender open only to ships registered in India), a 10-year-old offshore vessel that can be used for multiple purposes, and a 15?20-year-old high-speed craft that can accommodate 150 passengers, all of which will be used on the service between Kankesanthurai, Sri Lanka, and Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu. Rich from the epidemic, liner shipping firms have placed huge orders for container ships that will be delivered in the next two to three years. The only way that any old container tonnage will be forced into the market for sale is through those deliveries, he continued. The container shipping sector is doubtful that SCI will get proposals to purchase a ship given the state of the market. According to a container shipping industry executive, the supply chain has already experienced an elongation of more than 20 days due to the detour via the Cape of Good Hope. For example, on the service jointly operated by SCI and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) with nine ships, the requirement has increased to 12 ships because the voyage time has extended to 85 days from 63 days. The executive explained that to cover the rotation, the service needs three more vessels. Similarly, every service in the container shipping industry globally requires more vessels. Fleet owners are cancelling sailings, and many are displaying schedules for ships that do not exist. Attempts to book on a specific vessel result in automatic rejection due to the unavailability of such vessels. There are no surplus ships for sale, so owners are faced with the question of where to acquire ships for purchase. During the COVID pandemic, when India's exporters suffered from soaring freight rates and a lack of container shipping capacity to transport their goods, they were dependent on global carriers. The Ministry of Ports, Shipping, and Waterways approved SCI to purchase two container ships with viability gap funding (VGF). However, there was no interest from anyone, and the plan did not progress. The industry executive remarked that if it were someone else, they would have eagerly accepted the opportunity to buy ships with VGF support. For instance, MSC recently initiated a container shipping service from Paradip Port to Colombo with VGF provided by the Odisha government, demonstrating that it could be accomplished. Currently, SCI only operates two container ships out of its 59-strong fleet. Containers are primarily a business-to-consumer (B2C) affair, whereas SCI operates as a business-to-business (B2B) company. A trade source commented that SCI operates container ships primarily to support Indian import-export trade with certain controls. Once this responsibility shifts to global conglomerates, they may coordinate and raise rates accordingly.

The state-run Shipping Corporation of India Ltd. (SCI) has received a poor response to its plan to purchase six used ships of various types for a budget exceeding Rs 20 billion through tenders, according to multiple sources, as very few fleet owners have lined up to offer their ships in a booming freight market. Crucially, a person with knowledge of the tender stated that the national carrier did not receive any offers for the purchase of a fifteen-year-old, 9,000?12,000 twenty-foot equivalent units (TEUs) capacity container ship. This is because the Red Sea crisis forced owners to reroute their box ships via the longer Cape of Good Hope rather than the shorter Suez Canal route in order to avoid attacks by Houthi militants backed by Yemen. Ship rerouting has resulted in more sailing days for the journey, requiring more ships to be deployed on services, soaking up extra capacity. The only part to generate a decent reaction was the 15-year-old very large gas carrier (VLGC) with a capacity to transport 79,000?84,000 cubic metres of LPG. SCI got half a dozen proposals for the vessel. The bids were nothing much to write home about for a 15-year-old medium-range (MR) product tanker with a 46,000?52,000 dead weight tonne (dwt) capacity. Additionally, SCI has invited bids for a 10-year-old tug supply vessel that can handle anchors (a domestic tender open only to ships registered in India), a 10-year-old offshore vessel that can be used for multiple purposes, and a 15?20-year-old high-speed craft that can accommodate 150 passengers, all of which will be used on the service between Kankesanthurai, Sri Lanka, and Nagapattinam, Tamil Nadu. Rich from the epidemic, liner shipping firms have placed huge orders for container ships that will be delivered in the next two to three years. The only way that any old container tonnage will be forced into the market for sale is through those deliveries, he continued. The container shipping sector is doubtful that SCI will get proposals to purchase a ship given the state of the market. According to a container shipping industry executive, the supply chain has already experienced an elongation of more than 20 days due to the detour via the Cape of Good Hope. For example, on the service jointly operated by SCI and Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) with nine ships, the requirement has increased to 12 ships because the voyage time has extended to 85 days from 63 days. The executive explained that to cover the rotation, the service needs three more vessels. Similarly, every service in the container shipping industry globally requires more vessels. Fleet owners are cancelling sailings, and many are displaying schedules for ships that do not exist. Attempts to book on a specific vessel result in automatic rejection due to the unavailability of such vessels. There are no surplus ships for sale, so owners are faced with the question of where to acquire ships for purchase. During the COVID pandemic, when India's exporters suffered from soaring freight rates and a lack of container shipping capacity to transport their goods, they were dependent on global carriers. The Ministry of Ports, Shipping, and Waterways approved SCI to purchase two container ships with viability gap funding (VGF). However, there was no interest from anyone, and the plan did not progress. The industry executive remarked that if it were someone else, they would have eagerly accepted the opportunity to buy ships with VGF support. For instance, MSC recently initiated a container shipping service from Paradip Port to Colombo with VGF provided by the Odisha government, demonstrating that it could be accomplished. Currently, SCI only operates two container ships out of its 59-strong fleet. Containers are primarily a business-to-consumer (B2C) affair, whereas SCI operates as a business-to-business (B2B) company. A trade source commented that SCI operates container ships primarily to support Indian import-export trade with certain controls. Once this responsibility shifts to global conglomerates, they may coordinate and raise rates accordingly.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Hindalco to Invest Up to Rs 80 Billion in FY25 Capex

Hindalco Industries has planned capital expenditure of Rs 75–80 billion for the current financial year, as disclosed in a regulatory filing. Managing Director Satish Pai noted during the Q4 earnings call that this year’s capex guidance ranges between Rs 75 billion and Rs 80 billion. For the previous fiscal year, the company had spent Rs 65 billion on capital expenditure. Pai added that guidance for the next year will be available by the third quarter, as upstream projects begin to take shape. In the March 2025 quarter, consolidated net profit rose by sixty-six per cent to Rs 52.8..

Next Story
Equipment

Mining Gear Sector May Touch Rs 3.75 Trillion by 2030

India’s mining and construction equipment (MCE) sector, currently valued at Rs 1.33 trillion ($16 billion), is projected to grow at a compound annual rate of 19 per cent, reaching Rs 3.75 trillion ($45 billion) by 2030, as per the Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) and Kearney report. The CII-Kearney Vision Report positions India as a future global hub in the MCE sector. With a global market of Rs 1,50,00,000 billion ($18 trillion), the MCE sector supports infrastructure, energy, and industrial growth worldwide, contributing 16 per cent to global gross domestic product. Indiaâ€..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Sanlam Invests in Shriram AMC with 23 Per Cent Stake

South Africa-based Sanlam has invested Rs 1.05 billion for a twenty-three per cent stake in the asset management arm of the Shriram Group. This marks Sanlam’s formal entry into the Indian market. Sanlam, which manages over USD 80 billion in assets, has maintained a partnership with the Chennai-based financial group for more than two decades. With this latest investment, it becomes a co-promoter in Shriram Asset Management Company alongside ShriramCredit Company. As a result, the overall promoter shareholding in the listed entity will rise from 62.55 per cent to 71.17 per cent. Sanl..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?