+
GERC Grants Extension For Seven Point Eight MW Captive Solar Project
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

GERC Grants Extension For Seven Point Eight MW Captive Solar Project

Panara Craft LLP sought a 90 day extension to commission its seven point eight megawatt (MW) captive solar power project in Gujarat, citing delays in financing and completion of evacuation infrastructure. The project is divided into two three point nine MW installations in Bharuch district and has faced setbacks in securing grid connectivity. The company said the loan process with the State Bank of India began in March 2024, was sanctioned in November 2024 and disbursement started in February 2025, which slowed execution.

The request was considered under GERC Order No. 06 of 2024 and the Gujarat Renewable Energy Policy 2023, which require solar projects ranging from one MW to 100 MW to be commissioned within 12 months of the Technical Feasibility Report. For Panara Craft the deadline was 22 April 2025 but the company argued the delays were beyond its control and should be treated as unavoidable circumstances. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited and Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited opposed the extension, asserting developer responsibility and noting that delayed disbursement did not amount to force majeure.

GERC examined project progress and observed that key technical activities such as pile drilling, casting and structure mounting had largely been completed. The Commission also referenced its earlier order in Petition No. 2564 of 2025 that extended the timeline for evacuation infrastructure from 12 months to 18 months. The company warned that strict action including cancellation of connectivity or encashment of bank guarantees worth Rs 3.9 million (mn) would inflict serious financial losses.

Balancing the circumstances, the Commission granted additional time and directed Panara Craft to complete remaining technical and regulatory work within six months from the date of its order, offering the developer an opportunity to secure grid connectivity without immediate penalties. The decision reflects an attempt to reconcile regulatory timelines with practical financing and infrastructure challenges and signals that prompt coordination remains essential to avoid future enforcement actions.

Panara Craft LLP sought a 90 day extension to commission its seven point eight megawatt (MW) captive solar power project in Gujarat, citing delays in financing and completion of evacuation infrastructure. The project is divided into two three point nine MW installations in Bharuch district and has faced setbacks in securing grid connectivity. The company said the loan process with the State Bank of India began in March 2024, was sanctioned in November 2024 and disbursement started in February 2025, which slowed execution. The request was considered under GERC Order No. 06 of 2024 and the Gujarat Renewable Energy Policy 2023, which require solar projects ranging from one MW to 100 MW to be commissioned within 12 months of the Technical Feasibility Report. For Panara Craft the deadline was 22 April 2025 but the company argued the delays were beyond its control and should be treated as unavoidable circumstances. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited and Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Limited opposed the extension, asserting developer responsibility and noting that delayed disbursement did not amount to force majeure. GERC examined project progress and observed that key technical activities such as pile drilling, casting and structure mounting had largely been completed. The Commission also referenced its earlier order in Petition No. 2564 of 2025 that extended the timeline for evacuation infrastructure from 12 months to 18 months. The company warned that strict action including cancellation of connectivity or encashment of bank guarantees worth Rs 3.9 million (mn) would inflict serious financial losses. Balancing the circumstances, the Commission granted additional time and directed Panara Craft to complete remaining technical and regulatory work within six months from the date of its order, offering the developer an opportunity to secure grid connectivity without immediate penalties. The decision reflects an attempt to reconcile regulatory timelines with practical financing and infrastructure challenges and signals that prompt coordination remains essential to avoid future enforcement actions.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Insurance is not a cost; it is protection for the balance sheet

As infrastructure projects grow larger and more complex, their risk profiles are evolving beyond physical damage. Underinsurance, business interruption, supply-chain disruptions, climate volatility, surety and transactional exposures can all have significant financial consequences. Mohan Agrawal, Director and Business Lead - Construction, Infra & Warehousing, EDME Insurance Brokers, discusses these emerging risks and the gaps in conventional insurance practices in a conversation with KAVITA PARAB, CW. He explains why infrastructure players need to view insurance not merely as a cost, but a..

Next Story
Equipment

Optimising Earthmoving

Constituting India’s biggest fleet of construction equipment by type, earthmovers positively impact project outcomes and company bottomlines if best practices are adopted. Here’s a guide from CW.Select the right machineOne of the biggest challenges in using earthmovers isn’t machine failure but using the wrong machine configuration for the application, according to Chaitanya Bhagde, P&M Head, SHC Projects. “Unless equipment is deployed after considering the soil type, excavation depth, haul distance and production target, the application will face low productivity, longer time depl..

Next Story
Real Estate

We engineer the way architecture gets built

DALBIR SINGH, Founder, HAACE, on the company’s bespoke approach to translating ambitious architecture into precisely engineered and executed structures.What does bespoke construction mean to HAACE, and how is it different from conventional contracting?For HAACE, bespoke construction means choosing the construction methodology around the design rather than forcing the design into a standard template. Every project is studied around its architectural intent, structural requirements and execution challenges. We deliberately take on a limited number of projects because this approach demands atte..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code