95% of properties do not have legal BU permission in Gujarat
Real Estate

95% of properties do not have legal BU permission in Gujarat

Just as the survey of buildings or properties with required Building Use (BU) permission is on across the state, it has become evident that 95% of the 34 lakh-odd properties that fall under the municipality or Nagar Palika jurisdiction in Gujarat do not hold legal BU permission, as per senior urban development authorities.

The officials claim that the purpose of the sample survey of 8,000-odd buildings in the state is to assist in drafting legislation that will be a roadmap for every citizen to mandatorily get BU approval for his or her property. The survey is likely to be made by February 20.

The exercise was taken up after the high court questioned why despite the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development (GRUDA) Act, certain buildings in Gujarat were devoid of legal BU permission.The truth is that people in municipalities and municipal corporations never came ahead to get BU approval due to income issues, as per a senior urban development department authority.

While emphasising the problem within nagarpalikas, the official told the media that in the case of older buildings built before 2007, authorities or citizens did not care whether properties were constructed on land with non-agricultural (NA) approval and, in this process, evaded applying for BU approval.

After 2008, the state government made NA approval mandatory ahead of applying for BU approval. This flip-flop and lack of clarity on mandatory processes before BU requirement was the issue for this tremendous confusion. It additionally prevented people from coming forward. Now they are stuck with buildings having 2-3 floors that are not part of the original building plans across municipalities and municipal corporations. He additionally pointed out that GRUDA Act or impact fee law was implemented without conducting a scientific study.

The anomaly of BU approval persisted despite the execution of the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development Act in 2001, which was an effort to normalise buildings made before November 22, 2000. A decade later, the same Act was again brought into power to standardise buildings built before March 28, 2011. Both these efforts did not resolve the problem of buildings without BU.

Image Source

Also read: Gujarat begins properties survey without BU permission

Just as the survey of buildings or properties with required Building Use (BU) permission is on across the state, it has become evident that 95% of the 34 lakh-odd properties that fall under the municipality or Nagar Palika jurisdiction in Gujarat do not hold legal BU permission, as per senior urban development authorities. The officials claim that the purpose of the sample survey of 8,000-odd buildings in the state is to assist in drafting legislation that will be a roadmap for every citizen to mandatorily get BU approval for his or her property. The survey is likely to be made by February 20. The exercise was taken up after the high court questioned why despite the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development (GRUDA) Act, certain buildings in Gujarat were devoid of legal BU permission.The truth is that people in municipalities and municipal corporations never came ahead to get BU approval due to income issues, as per a senior urban development department authority. While emphasising the problem within nagarpalikas, the official told the media that in the case of older buildings built before 2007, authorities or citizens did not care whether properties were constructed on land with non-agricultural (NA) approval and, in this process, evaded applying for BU approval. After 2008, the state government made NA approval mandatory ahead of applying for BU approval. This flip-flop and lack of clarity on mandatory processes before BU requirement was the issue for this tremendous confusion. It additionally prevented people from coming forward. Now they are stuck with buildings having 2-3 floors that are not part of the original building plans across municipalities and municipal corporations. He additionally pointed out that GRUDA Act or impact fee law was implemented without conducting a scientific study. The anomaly of BU approval persisted despite the execution of the Gujarat Regularisation of Unauthorised Development Act in 2001, which was an effort to normalise buildings made before November 22, 2000. A decade later, the same Act was again brought into power to standardise buildings built before March 28, 2011. Both these efforts did not resolve the problem of buildings without BU. Image Source Also read: Gujarat begins properties survey without BU permission

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Infrastructure Opportunity Outlook by IMPACCT.Info

India’s infrastructure pipeline is witnessing dynamic activity across stages — from immediate bidding to future planning. IMPACCT segments these into three categories: Immediate, 3–6 Month, and Future Opportunities, enabling businesses to identify, prepare, and participate in high-value tenders and projects across sectors...To read the full article Click Here..

Next Story
Real Estate

Serene Communities, Prathima Group Invest Rs 4 billion in Hyderabad

Serene Communities by Columbia Pacific, India’s largest senior living operator, has partnered with Prathima Group to develop two senior living projects in Hyderabad, marking its entry into Telangana. The collaboration represents an investment of Rs 4 billion, combining Serene’s international expertise with Prathima’s local development experience. The first project, Serene BILVANI One, launched in Shankarpally, is Hyderabad’s first premium senior living community. Designed for independent and active ageing, it features senior-friendly architecture, barrier-free design, and wellness..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India remains our most important market

Foundamental, the world’s leading venture capital platform focused on the project economy, has launched its third fund to strengthen its presence in India, APAC, and other global markets. Led by Berlin-based Managing Partners Shubhankar Bhattacharya and Patric Hellermann, Fund III aims for a final close by the end of 2025. In an exclusive interaction with CW, Bhattacharya shares insights on the fund’s mandate, India’s role in their strategy, and the opportunities they see in the construction-tech and project-based sectors. Can you briefly explain Fund III’s mandate and how In..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?