Airports Authority of India liable for paying land tax: Madras HC
Real Estate

Airports Authority of India liable for paying land tax: Madras HC

Madras High Court has declared that the Airports Authority of India (AAI) is responsible for paying Land Tax as it is not under the Central Government.

V Ramesh, the counsel for the petitioner, informed that AAI said that it is a statutory organisation under the control of the Ministry of Civil Aviation of the Indian Government.

The Civil Airports and Civil Enclaves at Defence Airports are operated by the petitioner over the country. The petitioner also holds particular lands in the Villages of St.Thomas Mount, Cowl Bazaar, Pazhavanthangal, and Porur, and these lands got assessed by the second respondent.

As compared to the tax of Urban Land Tax by the respondent, the petitioner registered below section 30(1) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act 1966. The revision petition got rejected.

The petitioner contended that Section 29 of the Act regards Exemptions.

The Indian Government and Ministry of Civil Aviation owns the petitioner wholly. Therefore, this exemption clause would be relevant to the petitioner, and in consequence, the impugned orders, levying tax are in breach of the exemption clause given below Section 29 of the Act.

Ramesh said that the AAI is a creation by a Parliament Act and the Act provides for the transfer and vesting of the undertakings of the International Airports Authority of India and National Airports Authority of India. It was also targeting better administration and cohesive management of Airports and Civil enclaves across the country, where the transport services were to be operated and included all aeronautical communication stations to help in the establishment of Airports.

In conclusion, the petitioner is a 'State' in the meaning of article 12 of the Constitution of India as its operations are directly controlled by the Ministry of Civil Aviation.

S M Subramaniam, the single-judge bench of Justice, instructed that AAI cannot be constructed as the Central Government in the sense of exemption clause as planned under section 29 (a) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act of 1966.

As a result, the State Government is authorised to impose the Urban Land Tax

Image Source

Madras High Court has declared that the Airports Authority of India (AAI) is responsible for paying Land Tax as it is not under the Central Government. V Ramesh, the counsel for the petitioner, informed that AAI said that it is a statutory organisation under the control of the Ministry of Civil Aviation of the Indian Government. The Civil Airports and Civil Enclaves at Defence Airports are operated by the petitioner over the country. The petitioner also holds particular lands in the Villages of St.Thomas Mount, Cowl Bazaar, Pazhavanthangal, and Porur, and these lands got assessed by the second respondent. As compared to the tax of Urban Land Tax by the respondent, the petitioner registered below section 30(1) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act 1966. The revision petition got rejected. The petitioner contended that Section 29 of the Act regards Exemptions. The Indian Government and Ministry of Civil Aviation owns the petitioner wholly. Therefore, this exemption clause would be relevant to the petitioner, and in consequence, the impugned orders, levying tax are in breach of the exemption clause given below Section 29 of the Act. Ramesh said that the AAI is a creation by a Parliament Act and the Act provides for the transfer and vesting of the undertakings of the International Airports Authority of India and National Airports Authority of India. It was also targeting better administration and cohesive management of Airports and Civil enclaves across the country, where the transport services were to be operated and included all aeronautical communication stations to help in the establishment of Airports. In conclusion, the petitioner is a 'State' in the meaning of article 12 of the Constitution of India as its operations are directly controlled by the Ministry of Civil Aviation. S M Subramaniam, the single-judge bench of Justice, instructed that AAI cannot be constructed as the Central Government in the sense of exemption clause as planned under section 29 (a) of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act of 1966. As a result, the State Government is authorised to impose the Urban Land Tax Image Source

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Products

Koemmerling opens Navi Mumbai experience centre

Koemmerling, a brand of the profine Group, has expanded its presence in the Mumbai metropolitan region with the opening of a new experience centre in Navi Mumbai and launched its Allure S46 minimal sliding door system for the Indian market.Located in CBD Belapur, the facility was inaugurated by Peter Mrosik, Owner and CEO, profine Group, along with Farid Khan, Chairman and Managing Director, profine India, and Kamal Bajaj, CEO, profine India.The company said the new centre will showcase its portfolio of uPVC and aluminium window and door systems to architects, developers and homeowners.The ina..

Next Story
Products

India's waterproofing market nears Rs 150 bn milestone

India's waterproofing industry is approaching a market size of Rs 150 billion and is expected to surpass the $2 billion milestone, according to speakers at the 2nd India International Waterproofers Conference & Expo 2026 organised by the Waterproofers Association of India (WAI) in New Delhi.The two-day event brought together more than 20 speakers, 55 international delegates and 53 exhibition booths, with discussions focusing on climate-resilient construction, advanced waterproofing technologies and international collaboration.Inaugurating the event, Durga Shanker Mishra, former Secretary, ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Dilip Buildcon Q1 FY27 Revenue at Rs 23.78 billion

Dilip Buildcon Limited reported consolidated revenue from operations of Rs 2,378 crore in Q1 FY27, along with EBITDA of Rs 429 crore and profit after tax of Rs 128 crore.Consolidated EBITDA margin stood at 18.1%, improving from 17.1% in Q4 FY26. On a standalone basis, revenue from operations was Rs 1,930 crore, EBITDA stood at Rs 199 crore and PAT was Rs 39 crore, with an EBITDA margin of 10.3%.The company’s order book stood at Rs 27,691 crore as of 30 June 2026, compared with Rs 28,830 crore as of 31 March 2026. Roads and highways accounted for 17.1% of the order book, irrigation and water ..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement