High Court says retrospective use of black money law unconstitutional
ECONOMY & POLICY

High Court says retrospective use of black money law unconstitutional

Rich Indians and large business families entangled in the stringent black money law are celebrating after the High Court ruled against its retrospective application.

For the first time, the court invoked Article 20 of the Constitution to nullify the retrospective use of the law, which was enacted in 2015 to target offshore bank accounts, properties, and companies of resident Indians.

Article 20 states that "no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence." In essence, one cannot be punished under a law that did not exist when the offence was committed. The Karnataka High Court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the income-tax department against individuals connected to overseas bank accounts and firms that were closed before the Black Money Act came into force. The court ruled that the prosecution against these petitioners did not meet constitutional standards under Article 20. This decision sets a precedent for numerous court cases, as many Indians had closed their bank accounts and companies before 2015 in anticipation of such a law.

However, under Section 72 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, overseas assets acquired years ago can also be scrutinised. The year the tax office receives the information is considered the year in which a foreign bank account was opened.

Referring to Section 72, Justice M. Nagaprasanna stated that it violates Article 20 of the Constitution. "The Special enactment is a statute. Article 20 comes under Chapter III of the Constitution of India, a fundamental right. The Constitution of India is not a statute. It is the fountainhead of all statutes including the special statute," the court ruled. (Source: ET)

Rich Indians and large business families entangled in the stringent black money law are celebrating after the High Court ruled against its retrospective application. For the first time, the court invoked Article 20 of the Constitution to nullify the retrospective use of the law, which was enacted in 2015 to target offshore bank accounts, properties, and companies of resident Indians. Article 20 states that no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence. In essence, one cannot be punished under a law that did not exist when the offence was committed. The Karnataka High Court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the income-tax department against individuals connected to overseas bank accounts and firms that were closed before the Black Money Act came into force. The court ruled that the prosecution against these petitioners did not meet constitutional standards under Article 20. This decision sets a precedent for numerous court cases, as many Indians had closed their bank accounts and companies before 2015 in anticipation of such a law. However, under Section 72 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, overseas assets acquired years ago can also be scrutinised. The year the tax office receives the information is considered the year in which a foreign bank account was opened. Referring to Section 72, Justice M. Nagaprasanna stated that it violates Article 20 of the Constitution. The Special enactment is a statute. Article 20 comes under Chapter III of the Constitution of India, a fundamental right. The Constitution of India is not a statute. It is the fountainhead of all statutes including the special statute, the court ruled. (Source: ET)

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code