High Court says retrospective use of black money law unconstitutional
ECONOMY & POLICY

High Court says retrospective use of black money law unconstitutional

Rich Indians and large business families entangled in the stringent black money law are celebrating after the High Court ruled against its retrospective application.

For the first time, the court invoked Article 20 of the Constitution to nullify the retrospective use of the law, which was enacted in 2015 to target offshore bank accounts, properties, and companies of resident Indians.

Article 20 states that "no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence." In essence, one cannot be punished under a law that did not exist when the offence was committed. The Karnataka High Court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the income-tax department against individuals connected to overseas bank accounts and firms that were closed before the Black Money Act came into force. The court ruled that the prosecution against these petitioners did not meet constitutional standards under Article 20. This decision sets a precedent for numerous court cases, as many Indians had closed their bank accounts and companies before 2015 in anticipation of such a law.

However, under Section 72 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, overseas assets acquired years ago can also be scrutinised. The year the tax office receives the information is considered the year in which a foreign bank account was opened.

Referring to Section 72, Justice M. Nagaprasanna stated that it violates Article 20 of the Constitution. "The Special enactment is a statute. Article 20 comes under Chapter III of the Constitution of India, a fundamental right. The Constitution of India is not a statute. It is the fountainhead of all statutes including the special statute," the court ruled. (Source: ET)

Rich Indians and large business families entangled in the stringent black money law are celebrating after the High Court ruled against its retrospective application. For the first time, the court invoked Article 20 of the Constitution to nullify the retrospective use of the law, which was enacted in 2015 to target offshore bank accounts, properties, and companies of resident Indians. Article 20 states that no person shall be convicted of any offence except for violation of a law in force at the time of the commission of the act charged as an offence. In essence, one cannot be punished under a law that did not exist when the offence was committed. The Karnataka High Court quashed the criminal proceedings initiated by the income-tax department against individuals connected to overseas bank accounts and firms that were closed before the Black Money Act came into force. The court ruled that the prosecution against these petitioners did not meet constitutional standards under Article 20. This decision sets a precedent for numerous court cases, as many Indians had closed their bank accounts and companies before 2015 in anticipation of such a law. However, under Section 72 of the Black Money (Undisclosed Foreign Income and Assets) and Imposition of Tax Act, overseas assets acquired years ago can also be scrutinised. The year the tax office receives the information is considered the year in which a foreign bank account was opened. Referring to Section 72, Justice M. Nagaprasanna stated that it violates Article 20 of the Constitution. The Special enactment is a statute. Article 20 comes under Chapter III of the Constitution of India, a fundamental right. The Constitution of India is not a statute. It is the fountainhead of all statutes including the special statute, the court ruled. (Source: ET)

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

TBO Tek Q2 Profit Climbs 12%, Revenue Surges 26% YoY

TBO Tek Limited one of the world’s largest travel distribution platforms, reported a solid performance for Q2 FY26 with a 26 per cent year-on-year increase in revenue to Rs 5.68 billion, reflecting broad-based growth and improving profitability.The company recorded a Gross Transaction Value (GTV) of Rs 8,901 crore, up 12 per cent YoY, driven by strong performance across Europe, MEA, and APAC regions. Adjusted EBITDA before acquisition-related costs stood at Rs 1.04 billion, up 16 per cent YoY, translating into an 18.32 per cent margin compared to 16.56 per cent in Q1 FY26. Profit after tax r..

Next Story
Infrastructure Energy

Northern Graphite, Rain Carbon Secure R&D Grant for Greener Battery Materials

Northern Graphite Corporation and Rain Carbon Canada Inc, a subsidiary of Rain Carbon Inc, have jointly received up to C$860,000 (€530,000) in funding under the Canada–Germany Collaborative Industrial Research and Development Programme to develop sustainable battery anode materials.The two-year, C$2.2 million project aims to transform natural graphite processing by-products into high-performance, battery-grade anode material (BAM). Supported by the National Research Council of Canada Industrial Research Assistance Programme (NRC IRAP) and Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs a..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Antony Waste Q2 Revenue Jumps 16%; Subsidiary Wins Rs 3,200 Cr WtE Projects

Antony Waste Handling Cell Limited (AWHCL), a leading player in India’s municipal solid waste management sector, announced a 16 per cent year-on-year increase in total operating revenue to Rs 2.33 billion for Q2 FY26. The growth was driven by higher waste volumes, escalated contracts, and strong operational execution.EBITDA rose 18 per cent to Rs 570 million, with margins steady at 21.6 per cent, while profit after tax stood at Rs 173 million, up 13 per cent YoY. Revenue from Municipal Solid Waste Collection and Transportation (MSW C&T) reached Rs 1.605 billion, and MSW Processing re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement