IBC offers little respite to resolution of stressed construction companies
ECONOMY & POLICY

IBC offers little respite to resolution of stressed construction companies

The resolution of stressed construction companies remains fairly challenging despite the implementation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC), according to ICRA ratings. About 202 construction entities facing financial stress have entered the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and are falling behind considerably, leaving creditors with a high margin to cover up.

Of the 202 companies, 59 have either achieved resolution or ordered liquidation. The other 143 entities are currently in the process to resolve the matter. According to the ratings, a sample of 15 large companies entered the resolution process where financial creditors have made claims amounting to Rs 1.3 trillion. These companies are either close to the 270-day deadline or have crossed it without a proper settlement, which may result in the liquidation of these firms. The liquidation value, however, covers less than 10 per cent of the creditor’s amount as they do not own any sizeable fixed assets and a large part of their borrowings comprise working capital debt. In most cases, even after resolution, the lenders have faced a significant haircut. 

“Timely initiation of the resolution process is critical for a construction company to realise maximum value for its creditors,” says Shubham Jain, Senior Vice-President and Group -Head, Corporate Ratings, ICRA. “Weak liquidity during the interim period could result in deterioration in operational performance, leading to cost overruns, termination of contracts, liquidated damages, penalties, invocation of bank guarantees, etc, which will further increase financial liability.”

A major factor that impedes smooth resolution is the existence of sizeable, non-fund based exposure. Construction companies are required to give clients bank guarantees (BGs); these are generally much higher than fund-based exposure. For stressed entities, the risk of invocation of a guarantee is also higher as the stretched financial position constricts their execution capabilities, which could lead to underperformance as per contractual obligations. The invocation of the BG converts a non-fund based exposure to a fund-based one and increases the overall liability for the company, thus aggravating the stress faced by the entity. The challenges faced will consequently delay resolution and significantly reduce realisable value. 


The resolution of stressed construction companies remains fairly challenging despite the implementation of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC), according to ICRA ratings. About 202 construction entities facing financial stress have entered the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) and are falling behind considerably, leaving creditors with a high margin to cover up.Of the 202 companies, 59 have either achieved resolution or ordered liquidation. The other 143 entities are currently in the process to resolve the matter. According to the ratings, a sample of 15 large companies entered the resolution process where financial creditors have made claims amounting to Rs 1.3 trillion. These companies are either close to the 270-day deadline or have crossed it without a proper settlement, which may result in the liquidation of these firms. The liquidation value, however, covers less than 10 per cent of the creditor’s amount as they do not own any sizeable fixed assets and a large part of their borrowings comprise working capital debt. In most cases, even after resolution, the lenders have faced a significant haircut. “Timely initiation of the resolution process is critical for a construction company to realise maximum value for its creditors,” says Shubham Jain, Senior Vice-President and Group -Head, Corporate Ratings, ICRA. “Weak liquidity during the interim period could result in deterioration in operational performance, leading to cost overruns, termination of contracts, liquidated damages, penalties, invocation of bank guarantees, etc, which will further increase financial liability.”A major factor that impedes smooth resolution is the existence of sizeable, non-fund based exposure. Construction companies are required to give clients bank guarantees (BGs); these are generally much higher than fund-based exposure. For stressed entities, the risk of invocation of a guarantee is also higher as the stretched financial position constricts their execution capabilities, which could lead to underperformance as per contractual obligations. The invocation of the BG converts a non-fund based exposure to a fund-based one and increases the overall liability for the company, thus aggravating the stress faced by the entity. The challenges faced will consequently delay resolution and significantly reduce realisable value. 

Next Story
Technology

VIAVI and QNu Labs Partner to Advance Quantum-Safe Network Security

Viavi Solutions Inc. (VIAVI) and QNu Labs have entered into a strategic partnership to develop quantum-safe security and advanced network intelligence technologies aimed at protecting critical infrastructure from emerging quantum threats. The partnership marks the first phase toward establishing a global industry consortium to accelerate open collaboration in quantum-secure communications across sectors.With the growth of quantum-safe technologies, ensuring resilience and reliability at the optical layer has become essential as quantum systems integrate with existing physical infrastructure. T..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India, Russia Hold 22nd Defence Commission Meet in New Delhi

Raksha Mantri Rajnath Singh and Russia’s Defence Minister Mr Andrei Belousov co-chaired the 22nd India–Russia Inter-Governmental Commission on Military and Military Technical Cooperation (IRIGC-M&MTC) at the Manekshaw Centre in New Delhi on 4 December 2025. Both sides reaffirmed that the longstanding bilateral relationship is anchored in mutual trust, shared principles and deep respect. The meeting comes ahead of the 23rd India–Russia Annual Summit between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Vladimir Putin.During the session, Rajnath Singh reiterated India’s commitment t..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

ITU–TRAI Workshop on QoS and QoE Begins in Bhubaneswar

The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), in collaboration with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), inaugurated the ITU–TRAI Workshop on Performance, Quality of Service and Quality of Experience in Bhubaneswar. The two-day international programme convened National Regulatory Authorities (NRAs), service providers and technical specialists from around the world to strengthen collaborative approaches to telecom service-quality frameworks. The inaugural ceremony featured a lamp-lighting, followed by a welcome address from Atul Kumar Chaudhary, Secretary, TRAI, and the inaugu..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Open In App