SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups
POWER & RENEWABLE ENERGY

SC upholds AERA powers, setback for GMR and Adani Groups

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit.

Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services.

The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest.

The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT.

The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services.

However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports.

(Business Standard)

The Supreme Court (SC) has upheld the authority of the Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA) to set tariffs for non-aeronautical services such as ground handling and cargo handling, dealing a blow to the GMR and Adani Groups. This decision overturns a ruling by the Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT) and orders that the matter proceed for hearing on merit. Delhi International Airport Limited (DIAL), led by GMR, and Mumbai International Airport Limited, under Adani Enterprises, challenged AERA’s tariff-setting authority for non-aeronautical services. They argued that AERA’s tariff determination is an adjudicatory function and raised doubts about its jurisdiction to regulate non-aeronautical services. The Supreme Court rejected this argument, clarifying that even administrative actions, such as AERA’s tariff regulation, require adherence to principles of natural justice, without necessarily being adjudicatory. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra emphasised that AERA’s primary duty is to ensure economically viable airport operations without compromising public interest. The court noted that AERA, acting as a regulator, must factor in multiple considerations to determine and amend tariffs as required in the public interest. It ruled that AERA is a necessary party in appeals against its tariff orders and must be included as a respondent in such cases before TDSAT. The conflict arose from a 2021 AERA order, which classified ground and cargo handling services as non-aeronautical when directly provided by DIAL but as aeronautical when managed through contractors. DIAL contested this order before TDSAT, which ruled in January 2023 that both services are non-aeronautical regardless of the provider. TDSAT also held that AERA lacked the jurisdiction to regulate tariffs for these services, citing existing agreements under which airport operators could set charges for non-aeronautical services. However, AERA argued that its 2008 Act empowers it to regulate these services, even though TDSAT ruled otherwise. With the Supreme Court’s latest decision, AERA’s regulatory authority is reaffirmed, marking a significant shift in the regulatory landscape for India’s airports. (Business Standard)

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

PPP Planned To Rejuvenate Arkavathi River At Rs 25–30 Bn

The Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board (BWSSB) has drawn up a public–private partnership scheme to revive the once-vital Arkavathi River, modelling the effort on Ahmedabad’s Sabarmati riverfront. A preliminary survey pegs the investment at Rs 25–30 billion and a detailed project report (DPR) is due by December 2025. Covering 53.7 km from Nandi Hills to Tippagondanahalli, the blueprint spans 1 449 sq km across Bengaluru Urban, Mandya, Chikkaballapur and Ramanagara districts, touching 734 villages, 77 settlements, ten lakes and 13 industrial belts. Key works include flood contr..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Reliance Infra Clears Rs 2.73 Bn Debt for JR Toll Road

Reliance Infrastructure announced on Monday that its wholly-owned subsidiary, JR Toll Road Private Ltd (JRTR), has fully settled a debt of Rs 2.73 billion—including interest—owed to Yes Bank Ltd (YBL).The settlement, formalised through an addendum to a prior agreement, marks the complete discharge of JRTR’s outstanding obligations to the lender. As part of the same agreement, Reliance Infrastructure's corporate guarantee for the loan has also been entirely released.In its regulatory filing, Reliance Infrastructure clarified that Yes Bank does not hold any shares in the company and is nei..

Next Story
Real Estate

Draft Rules To Modernise Maharashtra Housing Societies

Maharashtra is poised to overhaul the way its 0.125 million co-operative housing societies—home to about 20 million people—are run. The Draft Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 2025, released for public comment on 15 April, promises digital-friendly governance, clearer redevelopment norms and less day-to-day State intervention. Below are the key proposals.The one-off society registration fee would double to Rs 5,000, reflecting higher administrative costs. Annual General Meetings could be held online, provided at least two-thirds—or twenty—members join, and resolutions would nee..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?