US SEC has no jurisdiction to summon foreign national
ECONOMY & POLICY

US SEC has no jurisdiction to summon foreign national

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would need to serve summons on Adani Group Founder and Chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani, regarding alleged payoffs of $265 million (Rs220 billion), through appropriate diplomatic channels. It was emphasised that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to directly summon foreign nationals. Instead, the request must adhere to established protocols, such as routing through the Indian Embassy in the US and complying with other diplomatic formalities.

The SEC reportedly seeks the Adanis’ explanation regarding allegations of bribes paid to secure profitable solar power contracts. However, as clarified by two sources familiar with the matter, any legal communication must comply with the procedures outlined in the 1965 Hague Convention and the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between India and the US. The sources added that the summons, part of a legal dossier filed by the SEC in a New York court, would likely take time before being formally served.

According to the notice issued by the SEC on 21 November through the New York Eastern District Court, the recipients would be required to respond within 21 days of being served. The notice warned that failing to respond could result in a default judgment being entered against them for the relief sought in the complaint. It also directed that the answer or motion be filed with the court.

The indictment, unsealed in a New York court, alleges that Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including Sagar Adani—director at the group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy Ltd—agreed to pay approximately $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between 2020 and 2024 to secure favourable solar energy supply contracts, anticipated to generate $2 billion in profits over 20 years.

Separate from the US Department of Justice’s indictment, the SEC has also accused the Adanis and Cyril Cabanes, an executive at Azure Power Global, of misconduct linked to an extensive bribery scheme. The Adani Group has denied these allegations, stating it would pursue all available legal remedies. The group reaffirmed its commitment to governance, transparency, and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions and assured stakeholders of its law-abiding principles.

An indictment in the US serves as a formal written allegation initiated by a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against the accused. It provides the individuals indicted with formal notice, allowing them to prepare a defence. The prosecutors stated that the investigation began in 2022 but was hindered by attempts to obstruct the inquiry.

They further alleged that the Adani Group had raised $2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US-based firms, based on misleading statements about its anti-bribery policies and the ongoing bribery investigation. US Attorney Breon Peace, in announcing the charges, claimed that the defendants orchestrated a complex bribery scheme to secure multi-billion-dollar contracts and subsequently misrepresented the situation while raising capital from investors in the US and internationally.

"Join industry leaders at RAHSTA Expo, India's premier platform for roads, highways and traffic infrastructure. Register now to explore innovations, network with experts and shape the future of mobility."

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would need to serve summons on Adani Group Founder and Chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani, regarding alleged payoffs of $265 million (Rs220 billion), through appropriate diplomatic channels. It was emphasised that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to directly summon foreign nationals. Instead, the request must adhere to established protocols, such as routing through the Indian Embassy in the US and complying with other diplomatic formalities. The SEC reportedly seeks the Adanis’ explanation regarding allegations of bribes paid to secure profitable solar power contracts. However, as clarified by two sources familiar with the matter, any legal communication must comply with the procedures outlined in the 1965 Hague Convention and the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between India and the US. The sources added that the summons, part of a legal dossier filed by the SEC in a New York court, would likely take time before being formally served. According to the notice issued by the SEC on 21 November through the New York Eastern District Court, the recipients would be required to respond within 21 days of being served. The notice warned that failing to respond could result in a default judgment being entered against them for the relief sought in the complaint. It also directed that the answer or motion be filed with the court. The indictment, unsealed in a New York court, alleges that Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including Sagar Adani—director at the group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy Ltd—agreed to pay approximately $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between 2020 and 2024 to secure favourable solar energy supply contracts, anticipated to generate $2 billion in profits over 20 years. Separate from the US Department of Justice’s indictment, the SEC has also accused the Adanis and Cyril Cabanes, an executive at Azure Power Global, of misconduct linked to an extensive bribery scheme. The Adani Group has denied these allegations, stating it would pursue all available legal remedies. The group reaffirmed its commitment to governance, transparency, and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions and assured stakeholders of its law-abiding principles. An indictment in the US serves as a formal written allegation initiated by a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against the accused. It provides the individuals indicted with formal notice, allowing them to prepare a defence. The prosecutors stated that the investigation began in 2022 but was hindered by attempts to obstruct the inquiry. They further alleged that the Adani Group had raised $2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US-based firms, based on misleading statements about its anti-bribery policies and the ongoing bribery investigation. US Attorney Breon Peace, in announcing the charges, claimed that the defendants orchestrated a complex bribery scheme to secure multi-billion-dollar contracts and subsequently misrepresented the situation while raising capital from investors in the US and internationally.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

ABS Marine Sees CRISIL Credit Rating Upgrade

ABS Marine Services has secured an upgrade to its long term and short term credit ratings from CRISIL, reflecting improved profitability and revenue growth through long term contracts. CRISIL moved the long term rating from BBB+/Stable to A-/Stable and revised the short term rating from A2 to A2+. The action signals strengthened financial metrics and operational resilience. The company benefited from durable client relationships with firms such as ONGC and Schlumberger. The rating decision followed stronger cash flows and an enlarged bank loan facility, which increased from Rs 3,705 million (m..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Project BRAHMANK Marks 16 Years Of Strategic Roads In Arunachal

Project BRAHMANK is marking 16 years of work to establish strategic road and bridge links across Arunachal Pradesh, maintaining and developing 811 kilometres of roads and nearly 86 bridges that range from small culverts to large steel and arch bridges. These transport links are described as critical for ensuring year-round movement of defence personnel, equipment and essential supplies while improving everyday travel for people in remote villages. The project balances national security requirements with regional development by focusing on reliable access in challenging terrain. Notable enginee..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Longleng CSOs Give One Week Ultimatum Over Two-Lane Highway

Civil society organisations (CSOs) in Longleng district have demanded immediate restoration of the deteriorating Changtongya–Longleng two-lane road and sought a detailed status report on the stalled construction within one week. The demand followed a consultative meeting convened under the Phom Peoples' Council (PPC) to discuss welfare and development concerns. PPC president YB Angam Phom said prolonged non-maintenance had caused hardship to commuters and affected transportation, local commerce and the district's development. The meeting urged authorities to undertake immediate restoration a..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement