+
US SEC has no jurisdiction to summon foreign national
ECONOMY & POLICY

US SEC has no jurisdiction to summon foreign national

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would need to serve summons on Adani Group Founder and Chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani, regarding alleged payoffs of $265 million (Rs220 billion), through appropriate diplomatic channels. It was emphasised that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to directly summon foreign nationals. Instead, the request must adhere to established protocols, such as routing through the Indian Embassy in the US and complying with other diplomatic formalities.

The SEC reportedly seeks the Adanis’ explanation regarding allegations of bribes paid to secure profitable solar power contracts. However, as clarified by two sources familiar with the matter, any legal communication must comply with the procedures outlined in the 1965 Hague Convention and the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between India and the US. The sources added that the summons, part of a legal dossier filed by the SEC in a New York court, would likely take time before being formally served.

According to the notice issued by the SEC on 21 November through the New York Eastern District Court, the recipients would be required to respond within 21 days of being served. The notice warned that failing to respond could result in a default judgment being entered against them for the relief sought in the complaint. It also directed that the answer or motion be filed with the court.

The indictment, unsealed in a New York court, alleges that Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including Sagar Adani—director at the group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy Ltd—agreed to pay approximately $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between 2020 and 2024 to secure favourable solar energy supply contracts, anticipated to generate $2 billion in profits over 20 years.

Separate from the US Department of Justice’s indictment, the SEC has also accused the Adanis and Cyril Cabanes, an executive at Azure Power Global, of misconduct linked to an extensive bribery scheme. The Adani Group has denied these allegations, stating it would pursue all available legal remedies. The group reaffirmed its commitment to governance, transparency, and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions and assured stakeholders of its law-abiding principles.

An indictment in the US serves as a formal written allegation initiated by a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against the accused. It provides the individuals indicted with formal notice, allowing them to prepare a defence. The prosecutors stated that the investigation began in 2022 but was hindered by attempts to obstruct the inquiry.

They further alleged that the Adani Group had raised $2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US-based firms, based on misleading statements about its anti-bribery policies and the ongoing bribery investigation. US Attorney Breon Peace, in announcing the charges, claimed that the defendants orchestrated a complex bribery scheme to secure multi-billion-dollar contracts and subsequently misrepresented the situation while raising capital from investors in the US and internationally.

US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) would need to serve summons on Adani Group Founder and Chairman Gautam Adani and his nephew Sagar Adani, regarding alleged payoffs of $265 million (Rs220 billion), through appropriate diplomatic channels. It was emphasised that the SEC lacks jurisdiction to directly summon foreign nationals. Instead, the request must adhere to established protocols, such as routing through the Indian Embassy in the US and complying with other diplomatic formalities. The SEC reportedly seeks the Adanis’ explanation regarding allegations of bribes paid to secure profitable solar power contracts. However, as clarified by two sources familiar with the matter, any legal communication must comply with the procedures outlined in the 1965 Hague Convention and the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty between India and the US. The sources added that the summons, part of a legal dossier filed by the SEC in a New York court, would likely take time before being formally served. According to the notice issued by the SEC on 21 November through the New York Eastern District Court, the recipients would be required to respond within 21 days of being served. The notice warned that failing to respond could result in a default judgment being entered against them for the relief sought in the complaint. It also directed that the answer or motion be filed with the court. The indictment, unsealed in a New York court, alleges that Gautam Adani, 62, and seven other defendants, including Sagar Adani—director at the group’s renewable energy arm, Adani Green Energy Ltd—agreed to pay approximately $265 million in bribes to Indian government officials between 2020 and 2024 to secure favourable solar energy supply contracts, anticipated to generate $2 billion in profits over 20 years. Separate from the US Department of Justice’s indictment, the SEC has also accused the Adanis and Cyril Cabanes, an executive at Azure Power Global, of misconduct linked to an extensive bribery scheme. The Adani Group has denied these allegations, stating it would pursue all available legal remedies. The group reaffirmed its commitment to governance, transparency, and regulatory compliance across all jurisdictions and assured stakeholders of its law-abiding principles. An indictment in the US serves as a formal written allegation initiated by a prosecutor and issued by a grand jury against the accused. It provides the individuals indicted with formal notice, allowing them to prepare a defence. The prosecutors stated that the investigation began in 2022 but was hindered by attempts to obstruct the inquiry. They further alleged that the Adani Group had raised $2 billion in loans and bonds, including from US-based firms, based on misleading statements about its anti-bribery policies and the ongoing bribery investigation. US Attorney Breon Peace, in announcing the charges, claimed that the defendants orchestrated a complex bribery scheme to secure multi-billion-dollar contracts and subsequently misrepresented the situation while raising capital from investors in the US and internationally.

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Lucknow Metro East-West Corridor Consultancy Contract Awarded

The Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has awarded the first construction-related consultancy contract for the Lucknow Metro East West Corridor to a joint venture of AYESA Ingenieria Arquitectura SAU and AYESA India Pvt Ltd. The firm was declared the lowest bidder for the Detailed Design Consultant contract for Lucknow Metro Line-2 under Phase 1B and the contract was recommended following the financial bid. The contract is valued at Rs 159.0 million (mn), covering design services for the corridor. Lucknow Metro Line-2 envisages the construction of an 11.165 kilometre corridor connecting Cha..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Div Com Kashmir Urges Fast Tracking Of Jhelum Water Transport Project

The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir has called for the fast-tracking of the Jhelum water transport project, urging district administrations and relevant agencies to accelerate planning and clearances. In a meeting convened at the divisional headquarters, the commissioner instructed officials from irrigation, public health engineering and municipal departments to prioritise the project and coordinate survey and design work. The directive emphasised removal of administrative bottlenecks and close monitoring to ensure timely mobilisation of resources and contractors. Officials were told to in..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Interarch Reports Strong Q3 And Nine Month Results

Interarch Building Solutions Limited reported unaudited results for the third quarter and nine months ended 31 December 2025, recording strong revenue growth driven by execution and a robust order book. Net revenue for the third quarter rose by 43.7 per cent to Rs 5.225 billion (bn), compared with Rs 3.636 bn a year earlier, reflecting heightened demand in pre-engineered building projects. The company’s total order book as at 31 January 2026 stood at Rs 16.85 bn, supporting near-term visibility. EBITDA excluding other income for the quarter increased by 43.2 per cent to Rs 503 million (mn),..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Open In App