Workers in construction over one storey in employees compensation act
ECONOMY & POLICY

Workers in construction over one storey in employees compensation act

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that individuals engaged in the construction, maintenance, repair, or demolition of buildings higher than one storey are considered employees under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The case involved the widow of a worker who fell from the third floor of a building while performing wall painting and repair tasks, sustaining fatal injuries. She sought compensation and interest under Section 3 of the Act from both the contractor who employed her husband and the building owner. However, the Employees Compensation Commissioner had rejected her claim, citing the absence of an employer-employee relationship. Challenging this decision, the appellant argued that the contractor had admitted to hiring the deceased, and this admission was accepted by the Commissioner, making the rejection of the claim erroneous. Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit referred to Section 2(dd) of the Act, which includes within its scope any person employed in a capacity described in Schedule II. Specifically, Para (viii) of Schedule II defines employees as those engaged in construction, maintenance, repair, or demolition work on buildings taller than one storey. The Court noted that the deceased, while performing work under employment, fell and suffered fatal injuries, qualifying him as an employee under the Act. It concluded that compensation was warranted and allowed the widow’s appeal. Case Title: Seema Devi v. Vimal Jain and Another [First Appeal From Order No. 1596 of 2022]. (Livelaw)

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that individuals engaged in the construction, maintenance, repair, or demolition of buildings higher than one storey are considered employees under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923. The case involved the widow of a worker who fell from the third floor of a building while performing wall painting and repair tasks, sustaining fatal injuries. She sought compensation and interest under Section 3 of the Act from both the contractor who employed her husband and the building owner. However, the Employees Compensation Commissioner had rejected her claim, citing the absence of an employer-employee relationship. Challenging this decision, the appellant argued that the contractor had admitted to hiring the deceased, and this admission was accepted by the Commissioner, making the rejection of the claim erroneous. Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit referred to Section 2(dd) of the Act, which includes within its scope any person employed in a capacity described in Schedule II. Specifically, Para (viii) of Schedule II defines employees as those engaged in construction, maintenance, repair, or demolition work on buildings taller than one storey. The Court noted that the deceased, while performing work under employment, fell and suffered fatal injuries, qualifying him as an employee under the Act. It concluded that compensation was warranted and allowed the widow’s appeal. Case Title: Seema Devi v. Vimal Jain and Another [First Appeal From Order No. 1596 of 2022]. (Livelaw)

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

RAHSTA 2026 to Host Certified Highway Construction Masterclass

RAHSTA 2026 will organise the Certified Highway Construction Masterclass, a specialised two-day corporate training programme for highway construction professionals, on July 8–9, 2026, at the Jio World Convention Centre.The Masterclass will be delivered by RASTA – Center for Road Technology and supported by Construction World and FIRST Construction Council.Designed as an industry-led refresher programme, the Masterclass aims to help engineering and project teams stay updated with the latest advancements in highway construction, pavement technologies, sustainable materials, intelligent compa..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Grand Mercure Mysuru Turns 10; BHVL to Invest Rs 1,000 Crore in Karnataka

Brigade Hotel Ventures Limited (BHVL) has marked the 10th anniversary of its flagship property, Grand Mercure Mysuru, by announcing a major investment plan of around Rs 1,000 crore in Karnataka over the next five years. The company said the investment will be directed towards new hospitality projects as well as modernisation of existing assets, aligning with the evolving demand for experiential tourism.The announcement comes as BHVL reiterated its focus on strengthening Mysuru’s position as a prominent global tourism destination by supporting the local micro-economy and adopting sustainable ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Ottobock and Celcius Set Up Prosthetics Warehouse in India

Celcius Logistics, a domestic third-party logistics (3PL) company specialising in end-to-end cold-chain solutions, has partnered with Ottobock India, the Indian arm of Germany-based Ottobock, to establish a dedicated prosthetics warehouse and logistics distribution hub in India. As part of the collaboration, a technology-enabled facility has been launched in Thane to streamline storage and nationwide movement of prosthetic and assistive devices.The dedicated warehouse is expected to strengthen the medical supply chain by reducing turnaround time and improving access to prosthetic products acro..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement