NHAI Sparks Debate on Speed Breaker Removal
ROADS & HIGHWAYS

NHAI Sparks Debate on Speed Breaker Removal

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has ignited a debate with its decision to remove speed breakers on the service road of NH-16. The move has triggered discussions among residents and officials regarding its implications for road safety and traffic management.

NHAI's decision to eliminate speed breakers on the service road of NH-16 has divided opinions among stakeholders. While some argue that removing speed breakers will improve traffic flow and reduce accidents, others express concerns about the potential risks posed to pedestrians and cyclists, especially in densely populated areas.

Proponents of the speed breaker removal emphasise the importance of maintaining a smooth and uninterrupted flow of traffic on national highways to enhance efficiency and safety. They believe that eliminating speed breakers will streamline vehicular movement and minimise delays for commuters travelling along NH-16.

However, critics of NHAI's decision argue that speed breakers serve as essential traffic calming measures, particularly in areas with high pedestrian activity or near residential neighbourhoods. They caution that the removal of speed breakers could lead to an increase in speeding vehicles, posing a threat to road users' safety.

The debate surrounding NHAI's decision underscores the complex considerations involved in road infrastructure management and traffic regulation. As discussions continue, stakeholders are urged to weigh the potential benefits of speed breaker removal against its possible drawbacks and explore alternative solutions to ensure both traffic efficiency and road safety along NH-16's service road.

The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) has ignited a debate with its decision to remove speed breakers on the service road of NH-16. The move has triggered discussions among residents and officials regarding its implications for road safety and traffic management. NHAI's decision to eliminate speed breakers on the service road of NH-16 has divided opinions among stakeholders. While some argue that removing speed breakers will improve traffic flow and reduce accidents, others express concerns about the potential risks posed to pedestrians and cyclists, especially in densely populated areas. Proponents of the speed breaker removal emphasise the importance of maintaining a smooth and uninterrupted flow of traffic on national highways to enhance efficiency and safety. They believe that eliminating speed breakers will streamline vehicular movement and minimise delays for commuters travelling along NH-16. However, critics of NHAI's decision argue that speed breakers serve as essential traffic calming measures, particularly in areas with high pedestrian activity or near residential neighbourhoods. They caution that the removal of speed breakers could lead to an increase in speeding vehicles, posing a threat to road users' safety. The debate surrounding NHAI's decision underscores the complex considerations involved in road infrastructure management and traffic regulation. As discussions continue, stakeholders are urged to weigh the potential benefits of speed breaker removal against its possible drawbacks and explore alternative solutions to ensure both traffic efficiency and road safety along NH-16's service road.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code