RERA can freeze bank accounts; builder requires consent for transactions

11 Jun 2019 Editorial Team

Reports indicate that RERA was approached in September 2018 by the homebuyers of the project with complaints against the developer for project delay and alleged irregularities. With construction on the Rs 15 billion project initiated in 2007 – it’s been 12 years and the project is yet to meet completion. A renowned newspaper recently reported on this further stating that UP RERA has found severe financial irregularities, diversion and siphoning of funds and double allotment of apartments in three phases of the project. It is known that the final decision was made after the promoter was unable to provide a reasonable response to the show-cause notices on why the project’s three phases should not be deregistered.

If a developer – after having secured the registration number under RERA – indulges in any unfair practices defined in the RERA Act, the authority can deregister the project. And post deregistration, the concerned RERA needs to inform RERA offices in other states and Union Territories about such a revocation. Also, as reported, RERA is mandated to impose various restrictions and controls on the project and the developer in line with Clause 7 of the Act. For instance, RERA can freeze the bank accounts related to the project, and the developer is not allowed to make any payment or withdrawals from these accounts without the authority’s approval. Rules also mandate RERA to debar the project’s developer or promoter from accessing the authority’s website in relation to the concerned project. Besides, UP RERA has reportedly specified the name of the defaulting promoter in the list of defaulters, as per the rules.

Now with the project being deregistered, the responsibility to ensure its completion in time shifts to the authority. However, reports indicate that as per the Act, the authority has to first offer homebuyers a chance to complete the construction of the project on their own. This decision of the homebuyers also depends on the status and other factors pertinent to the project. However, if the homebuyers show their inability to execute and complete the remaining construction, the onus is on the authority to complete the project.

In the case of project Aranya, as reported, UP Rera is confident that its decision is a step in the right direction and is open to provide the necessary support to homebuyers.

In a first-of-its-kind decision, the Uttar Pradesh Real Estate Regulatory Authority (UP Rera), a month ago, has reportedly deregistered three phases of housing project Aranya in Noida. This project was being constructed by Unnati Fortune Holdings, and the deregistration has been done under Section 7 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. The Act states that every upcoming project meeting certain conditions needs to get registered with RERA of the respective state.Reports indicate that RERA was approached in September 2018 by the homebuyers of the project with complaints against the developer for project delay and alleged irregularities. With construction on the Rs 15 billion project initiated in 2007 – it’s been 12 years and the project is yet to meet completion. A renowned newspaper recently reported on this further stating that UP RERA has found severe financial irregularities, diversion and siphoning of funds and double allotment of apartments in three phases of the project. It is known that the final decision was made after the promoter was unable to provide a reasonable response to the show-cause notices on why the project’s three phases should not be deregistered.If a developer – after having secured the registration number under RERA – indulges in any unfair practices defined in the RERA Act, the authority can deregister the project. And post deregistration, the concerned RERA needs to inform RERA offices in other states and Union Territories about such a revocation. Also, as reported, RERA is mandated to impose various restrictions and controls on the project and the developer in line with Clause 7 of the Act. For instance, RERA can freeze the bank accounts related to the project, and the developer is not allowed to make any payment or withdrawals from these accounts without the authority’s approval. Rules also mandate RERA to debar the project’s developer or promoter from accessing the authority’s website in relation to the concerned project. Besides, UP RERA has reportedly specified the name of the defaulting promoter in the list of defaulters, as per the rules.Now with the project being deregistered, the responsibility to ensure its completion in time shifts to the authority. However, reports indicate that as per the Act, the authority has to first offer homebuyers a chance to complete the construction of the project on their own. This decision of the homebuyers also depends on the status and other factors pertinent to the project. However, if the homebuyers show their inability to execute and complete the remaining construction, the onus is on the authority to complete the project. In the case of project Aranya, as reported, UP Rera is confident that its decision is a step in the right direction and is open to provide the necessary support to homebuyers.

Infrastructure Transport

15 Sep 2025

Cabinet Approves Key Highway and Rail Projects in Bihar Region

The Union Cabinet on Wednesday approved the four-laning of the 84.2-km Mokama-Munger section of the Buxar-Bhagalpur high-speed corridor, a key industrial region in poll-bound Bihar. The Cabinet also sanctioned the doubling of the 177-km Bhagalpur-Dumka-Rampurhat railway line, which passes through Bihar, Jharkhand, and West Bengal, at a cost of Rs 31.7 billion.The Rs 44.5 billion highway project will be constructed under the hybrid annuity model, a variant of public-private partnership. The Mokama-Munger stretch was the only remaining two-lane section of the 363-km Buxar-Bhagalpur corridor. Fou..

Infrastructure Transport

15 Sep 2025

NGT Issues Notice on Bengaluru Twin Tunnel Project

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Wednesday issued notices in response to a petition filed by Bengaluru Praja Vedike and others, challenging the Bengaluru twin tunnel road project. Petitioners claim the project was “hastily announced” and bypassed mandatory environmental impact assessment procedures.Notices have been served to the Karnataka Government, Greater Bengaluru Authority, State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Bengaluru Smart Infrastructure Ltd (B-SMILE), the Union Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, and project consultants.The 16.74-km twin-tube..

Real Estate

15 Sep 2025

India’s Residential Sales to Dip Slightly in FY26

Residential sales in India’s seven major cities are projected to decline by up to 3 per cent year-on-year in FY26 to 620–640 million square feet (msf), amid a moderation in sales velocity, according to ratings agency Icra.In FY25, sales stood at 643 msf, down 8 per cent YoY, following a sharp contraction in new launches and moderated demand in the affordable and mid-income segments. This slowdown came after the sector posted a robust compound annual growth rate of 26 per cent in area sales between FY22 and FY24.Icra noted: “Having seen a strong upcycle, the sector entered an equilibrium ..