Centre Doesn’t Owe Any Mining Royalty Dues: Minister
COAL & MINING

Centre Doesn’t Owe Any Mining Royalty Dues: Minister

The Union govt has denied that it owes Jharkhand around Rs 1.36 trillion in mining (coal) royalty, an issue the mineral-rich state has been raising since long. The statement of the Union finance ministry in the Lok Sabha on Monday could further strain relations between the Centre and the state, where the Hemant Soren-led INDIA bloc govt has been claiming that Jharkhand has been denied its bonafide due in lieu of mining coal by several public sector units. While responding to a query raised by Purnia (Bihar) MP Rajesh Ranjan (Pappu Yadav) in Lok Sabha, Union minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary in a written statement clarified that there is no discrimination in the allocation of funds to states by the Centre. Ranjan sought to know whether the Jharkhand govt's share in tax earned as revenue from coal to the tune of Rs 1.40 trillion has been pending with the Centre for years and the reasons behind it. He also asked whether the Centre is discriminating in the allocation of funds to the states and when will the blocked funds be released to provide impetus to the state in furthering its development works. Replying to it, the minister categorically denied that any share of Jharkhand is pending with the Centre. Chaudhary's statement read, "The Union govt provides funds to states under various heads such as tax devolution, grant-in-aid for centrally sponsored schemes, finance commission transfers, scheme for special assistance to states for capital expenditure/investment. In addition, funds are released in various central sector schemes to be utilised in the state of Jharkhand. Funds are released based on the recommendations of the finance commission, scheme guidelines, fulfilment of the stipulated conditions and submission of utilisation certificates of funds released earlier." As per the response, Jharkhand received Rs 77.9 billion from the Centre over the last three financial years under various heads. The Centre's statement, however, is in contradiction to Hemant govt's claims. In April 2022, former chief secretary Sukhdev Singh letter stated that dues were pending under various categories namely — Rs 29 billion for dues of royalty payable on washed coal; Rs 32 billion related to common cause judgement and Rs 1,01,142 in lieu of govt land acquisition.

The Union govt has denied that it owes Jharkhand around Rs 1.36 trillion in mining (coal) royalty, an issue the mineral-rich state has been raising since long. The statement of the Union finance ministry in the Lok Sabha on Monday could further strain relations between the Centre and the state, where the Hemant Soren-led INDIA bloc govt has been claiming that Jharkhand has been denied its bonafide due in lieu of mining coal by several public sector units. While responding to a query raised by Purnia (Bihar) MP Rajesh Ranjan (Pappu Yadav) in Lok Sabha, Union minister of state for finance Pankaj Chaudhary in a written statement clarified that there is no discrimination in the allocation of funds to states by the Centre. Ranjan sought to know whether the Jharkhand govt's share in tax earned as revenue from coal to the tune of Rs 1.40 trillion has been pending with the Centre for years and the reasons behind it. He also asked whether the Centre is discriminating in the allocation of funds to the states and when will the blocked funds be released to provide impetus to the state in furthering its development works. Replying to it, the minister categorically denied that any share of Jharkhand is pending with the Centre. Chaudhary's statement read, The Union govt provides funds to states under various heads such as tax devolution, grant-in-aid for centrally sponsored schemes, finance commission transfers, scheme for special assistance to states for capital expenditure/investment. In addition, funds are released in various central sector schemes to be utilised in the state of Jharkhand. Funds are released based on the recommendations of the finance commission, scheme guidelines, fulfilment of the stipulated conditions and submission of utilisation certificates of funds released earlier. As per the response, Jharkhand received Rs 77.9 billion from the Centre over the last three financial years under various heads. The Centre's statement, however, is in contradiction to Hemant govt's claims. In April 2022, former chief secretary Sukhdev Singh letter stated that dues were pending under various categories namely — Rs 29 billion for dues of royalty payable on washed coal; Rs 32 billion related to common cause judgement and Rs 1,01,142 in lieu of govt land acquisition.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?