Supreme Court Seeks Reply On Shifting Coal Units From Capital
COAL & MINING

Supreme Court Seeks Reply On Shifting Coal Units From Capital

The Supreme Court (SC) has sought a response from the Union Government on a plea seeking the shifting of coal-fired units out of the national capital. The petition has raised concerns about air quality and public health linked to the operation of these installations within the city. The court asked the central authority to address the legal and administrative basis for allowing such units to continue in an urban setting.

The bench has requested a detailed explanation of the feasibility of relocation, including the operational, logistical and environmental implications of moving generation capacity. It has noted the need to reconcile environmental standards with energy security and to identify alternatives for affected power supply. The court also signalled that any plan must consider compliance with statutory pollution norms and safeguards for communities affected by both continued operation and relocation.

Officials and stakeholders are expected to outline timelines, estimated costs and measures to limit disruption to consumers and industries dependent on the units. The Union Government has been asked to indicate whether arrangements for alternate sites or compensatory measures are in place and how regulatory oversight will be enforced during any transition. The plea has prompted the judiciary to scrutinise the manner in which administrative decisions have balanced economic and health considerations.

The matter will be listed for further hearing after the government files its reply, and the court will thereafter determine appropriate directions. Observers expect the proceedings to examine the roles of urban planning authorities and pollution control agencies in preventing recurrence of similar situations. The final outcome will aim to protect public health while ensuring continuity of essential public services.

The Supreme Court (SC) has sought a response from the Union Government on a plea seeking the shifting of coal-fired units out of the national capital. The petition has raised concerns about air quality and public health linked to the operation of these installations within the city. The court asked the central authority to address the legal and administrative basis for allowing such units to continue in an urban setting. The bench has requested a detailed explanation of the feasibility of relocation, including the operational, logistical and environmental implications of moving generation capacity. It has noted the need to reconcile environmental standards with energy security and to identify alternatives for affected power supply. The court also signalled that any plan must consider compliance with statutory pollution norms and safeguards for communities affected by both continued operation and relocation. Officials and stakeholders are expected to outline timelines, estimated costs and measures to limit disruption to consumers and industries dependent on the units. The Union Government has been asked to indicate whether arrangements for alternate sites or compensatory measures are in place and how regulatory oversight will be enforced during any transition. The plea has prompted the judiciary to scrutinise the manner in which administrative decisions have balanced economic and health considerations. The matter will be listed for further hearing after the government files its reply, and the court will thereafter determine appropriate directions. Observers expect the proceedings to examine the roles of urban planning authorities and pollution control agencies in preventing recurrence of similar situations. The final outcome will aim to protect public health while ensuring continuity of essential public services.

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code