IOC, BPCL, GAIL fined for not meeting listing norm
OIL & GAS

IOC, BPCL, GAIL fined for not meeting listing norm

India's largest oil companies, including Indian Oil, BPCL, and gas utility GAIL, have been fined for the fifth consecutive quarter for failing to meet listing norms that require the presence of the requisite number of independent and women directors on their boards. Stock exchanges BSE and NSE imposed fines on oil refining and fuel marketing giants Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL), explorer Oil India Ltd (OIL), gas utility GAIL (India) Ltd, and refiner Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd (MRPL) for not complying with the listing requirements in the April-June quarter.

In separate filings with the stock exchanges, the companies outlined the fines imposed by BSE and NSE for either lacking the required number of independent directors or not having the mandated women directors during the quarter ending June 30, 2024. However, they were quick to clarify that the appointment of directors is done by the government, and they had no role in this process. The companies had been fined for the same issue in the previous four quarters as well. Listing norms stipulate that companies must have independent directors in proportion to executive or functional directors, and they are also required to have at least one woman director on the board.

IOC reported that BSE and the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd (NSE) imposed a fine of Rs 5,36,900 each on the company for non-compliance with Regulation 17(1) of the SEBI (LODR) concerning the composition of the Board of Directors during the quarter ending June 30, 2024.

In response to the notices, IOC stated that it had informed the BSE and NSE via a letter dated August 22, 2024, that as a government company, the power to appoint directors, including independent directors, rests with the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. Therefore, the shortfall in independent directors and the non-appointment of a woman independent director on the company's board during the quarter ending June 30, 2024, was not due to any negligence or default by the company.

IOC requested that it should not be held liable for the fines and that they should be waived. The company also mentioned that it regularly contacts the ministry to ensure the appointment of the required number of directors to comply with corporate governance norms. Additionally, IOC noted that similar notices from BSE and NSE had been issued in the past, and the company's waiver requests had been considered favorably by the exchanges.

GAIL and other companies, including OIL and MRPL, were also fined Rs 5,36,900 each by BSE and NSE. These oil giants have not complied with the listing norms since April last year and have faced fines every quarter since then. IOC, HPCL, BPCL, GAIL, OIL, and MRPL were each fined Rs 5,36,900 by NSE and BSE for the January-March quarter as well.

India's largest oil companies, including Indian Oil, BPCL, and gas utility GAIL, have been fined for the fifth consecutive quarter for failing to meet listing norms that require the presence of the requisite number of independent and women directors on their boards. Stock exchanges BSE and NSE imposed fines on oil refining and fuel marketing giants Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd (HPCL), Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd (BPCL), explorer Oil India Ltd (OIL), gas utility GAIL (India) Ltd, and refiner Mangalore Refinery and Petrochemicals Ltd (MRPL) for not complying with the listing requirements in the April-June quarter. In separate filings with the stock exchanges, the companies outlined the fines imposed by BSE and NSE for either lacking the required number of independent directors or not having the mandated women directors during the quarter ending June 30, 2024. However, they were quick to clarify that the appointment of directors is done by the government, and they had no role in this process. The companies had been fined for the same issue in the previous four quarters as well. Listing norms stipulate that companies must have independent directors in proportion to executive or functional directors, and they are also required to have at least one woman director on the board. IOC reported that BSE and the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd (NSE) imposed a fine of Rs 5,36,900 each on the company for non-compliance with Regulation 17(1) of the SEBI (LODR) concerning the composition of the Board of Directors during the quarter ending June 30, 2024. In response to the notices, IOC stated that it had informed the BSE and NSE via a letter dated August 22, 2024, that as a government company, the power to appoint directors, including independent directors, rests with the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Government of India. Therefore, the shortfall in independent directors and the non-appointment of a woman independent director on the company's board during the quarter ending June 30, 2024, was not due to any negligence or default by the company. IOC requested that it should not be held liable for the fines and that they should be waived. The company also mentioned that it regularly contacts the ministry to ensure the appointment of the required number of directors to comply with corporate governance norms. Additionally, IOC noted that similar notices from BSE and NSE had been issued in the past, and the company's waiver requests had been considered favorably by the exchanges. GAIL and other companies, including OIL and MRPL, were also fined Rs 5,36,900 each by BSE and NSE. These oil giants have not complied with the listing norms since April last year and have faced fines every quarter since then. IOC, HPCL, BPCL, GAIL, OIL, and MRPL were each fined Rs 5,36,900 by NSE and BSE for the January-March quarter as well.

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?