Delhi HC to hear Orris Infrastructure vs Godrej Properties
Real Estate

Delhi HC to hear Orris Infrastructure vs Godrej Properties

The Delhi High Court is now hearing arguments from two developers on a housing project in the city, and the justices must decide who should hear the case first. The Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) filed a formal complaint (FIR) against Godrej Properties and its senior management in relation to Godrej Air, following the orders of a capital court. In its court filing, Orris Infrastructure, the plaintiff, stated that Godrej Properties was only required to pay Rs 0.37 billion for the 10 acres of land needed for the project by September 2022, although the latter was meant to pay Rs 2.02 billion. Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC are cited in the EOW case. After reviewing Orris's appeal, the chief metropolitan magistrate (south-west) of Dwarka, Rajat Goyal, issued an order on May 28 registering the FIR and requiring that a compliance report be given to the court. The next day, the case was filed. Godrej Properties subsequently initiated legal proceedings in the Delhi High Court to challenge the lower court's order. Following a hearing involving both parties, Judge Dinesh Kumar Sharma observed on June 7: "This court considers that this case falls within the category of rarest of rare cases, where the documents filed indicate the jurisdiction of the courts in Gurgaon. The learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) has passed an order for the registration of an FIR despite noting that the investigation agency reported that the alleged offence had been committed within the jurisdiction of Gurgaon and the complaint had been sent to Gurgaon." The court issued a stay on any coercive action in the case until the next hearing, scheduled for July 11. Counsel for Godrej Properties argued that the lower court had mechanically passed the order without possessing territorial jurisdiction. On the other hand, counsel for Orris argued that various meetings between both parties had occurred in Delhi, which fell within the territorial jurisdiction of the Dwarka court.

The Delhi High Court is now hearing arguments from two developers on a housing project in the city, and the justices must decide who should hear the case first. The Delhi Police's Economic Offences Wing (EOW) filed a formal complaint (FIR) against Godrej Properties and its senior management in relation to Godrej Air, following the orders of a capital court. In its court filing, Orris Infrastructure, the plaintiff, stated that Godrej Properties was only required to pay Rs 0.37 billion for the 10 acres of land needed for the project by September 2022, although the latter was meant to pay Rs 2.02 billion. Sections 406 (criminal breach of trust), 420 (cheating), and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of the IPC are cited in the EOW case. After reviewing Orris's appeal, the chief metropolitan magistrate (south-west) of Dwarka, Rajat Goyal, issued an order on May 28 registering the FIR and requiring that a compliance report be given to the court. The next day, the case was filed. Godrej Properties subsequently initiated legal proceedings in the Delhi High Court to challenge the lower court's order. Following a hearing involving both parties, Judge Dinesh Kumar Sharma observed on June 7: This court considers that this case falls within the category of rarest of rare cases, where the documents filed indicate the jurisdiction of the courts in Gurgaon. The learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (CMM) has passed an order for the registration of an FIR despite noting that the investigation agency reported that the alleged offence had been committed within the jurisdiction of Gurgaon and the complaint had been sent to Gurgaon. The court issued a stay on any coercive action in the case until the next hearing, scheduled for July 11. Counsel for Godrej Properties argued that the lower court had mechanically passed the order without possessing territorial jurisdiction. On the other hand, counsel for Orris argued that various meetings between both parties had occurred in Delhi, which fell within the territorial jurisdiction of the Dwarka court.

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

VECV Sales Rise 7.8 Per Cent In May 2026

VE Commercial Vehicles recorded sales of 7,978 units in May 2026, compared to 7,401 units in May 2025, registering growth of 7.8 per cent. This included 7,789 units from the Eicher brand and 189 units from the Volvo brand.Eicher branded trucks and buses reported sales of 7,789 units during the month, up 7.3 per cent from 7,258 units a year earlier. In the domestic commercial vehicle market, Eicher sales rose 9.1 per cent to 7,375 units from 6,758 units in May 2025.Exports declined 17.2 per cent to 414 units from 500 units in the corresponding month last year. Volvo Trucks and Volvo Buses recor..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Table Space Strengthens DESYN Leadership Team

Table Space has announced strategic leadership appointments within DESYN, its integrated Design and Build business, as it looks to strengthen operations across key enterprise and GCC markets in India. DESYN was launched as a strategic extension of Table Space’s workspace solutions portfolio to meet rising demand for agile, high-quality and rapidly deployable enterprise workspaces.Shruti Ookabhoy has joined DESYN as Executive Director and will lead the Design vertical, focusing on design capability, operational excellence and team development across markets. She brings over 22 years of experi..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Concord Associate Bags Rs 2.79 Bn Kavach Order

Concord Control Systems said its associate company, Progota India, has received a Rs 2.79 bn domestic order from Indian Railways for the supply, installation, testing and commissioning of on-board Kavach 4.0 loco equipment.The order is scheduled for execution within 12 months and strengthens Concord’s role in India’s railway safety and signalling ecosystem. Kavach is India’s indigenous automatic train protection system, designed to improve operational safety by helping prevent signal passing at danger and reducing collision risks.Gaurav Lath, Joint Managing Director, Concord Control Syst..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement