Government orders to help land grabbers in regularising lands
Real Estate

Government orders to help land grabbers in regularising lands

The Telangana High Court gave the chief secretary an ultimatum of six weeks to file a counter affidavit to a 2015 Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The PIL challenged government order (GO) 59, which allowed occupants of government lands in urban areas to regularise encroachment of public land for a fee that they had occupied.

The state has been avoiding filing its counter for the last seven years.

Petitioner counsel, Chikkudu Prabhakar, told the media the state had issued two government orders (GOs), 58 and 59, for regularisation. The court did not challenge GO 58 as it was for small plots from one sq yd to 250 sq yd occupied by people for dwelling. The court had challenged GO 59 as it gave undue advantage to land grabbers.

The court will collect a nominal fee from those who encroached government land from 251 sq yd and above. The GO also allows land grabbers to pay the nominal fees in four instalments to regularise the land.

Besides an inordinate delay in filing its counter to the court, the state-issued order, GO MS No 14, in February is allowing another fresh round of regularisation process.

He added that an interim application had been filed, modifying to include the February 2022 GO. The policy of regularisation of big land deals runs counter to land encroachment and land grabbing acts.

He told the media that the state’s regularisation of GOs also violates the spirit of several Supreme Court orders.

He said that the GOs would only help the land grabbers who had occupied government land parcels in urban areas of the city. Moreover, it will violate the land ceiling Act provisions.

Prabhakar said if the state fails to file a counter in the court, the chief secretary will have to appear before the next hearing. The Bench has posted the next case to 20 July.

Image Source

Also read: Talasani inaugurates last down ramp of PVNR Expressway

The Telangana High Court gave the chief secretary an ultimatum of six weeks to file a counter affidavit to a 2015 Public Interest Litigation (PIL). The PIL challenged government order (GO) 59, which allowed occupants of government lands in urban areas to regularise encroachment of public land for a fee that they had occupied. The state has been avoiding filing its counter for the last seven years. Petitioner counsel, Chikkudu Prabhakar, told the media the state had issued two government orders (GOs), 58 and 59, for regularisation. The court did not challenge GO 58 as it was for small plots from one sq yd to 250 sq yd occupied by people for dwelling. The court had challenged GO 59 as it gave undue advantage to land grabbers. The court will collect a nominal fee from those who encroached government land from 251 sq yd and above. The GO also allows land grabbers to pay the nominal fees in four instalments to regularise the land. Besides an inordinate delay in filing its counter to the court, the state-issued order, GO MS No 14, in February is allowing another fresh round of regularisation process. He added that an interim application had been filed, modifying to include the February 2022 GO. The policy of regularisation of big land deals runs counter to land encroachment and land grabbing acts. He told the media that the state’s regularisation of GOs also violates the spirit of several Supreme Court orders. He said that the GOs would only help the land grabbers who had occupied government land parcels in urban areas of the city. Moreover, it will violate the land ceiling Act provisions. Prabhakar said if the state fails to file a counter in the court, the chief secretary will have to appear before the next hearing. The Bench has posted the next case to 20 July. Image Source Also read: Talasani inaugurates last down ramp of PVNR Expressway

Next Story
Building Material

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Next Story
Technology

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?