GST Dept Scrutinizes Real Estate Developers' Expenses for 2017-18
Real Estate

GST Dept Scrutinizes Real Estate Developers' Expenses for 2017-18

The State GST department has sent about 20,000 notifications to a variety of taxpayers from various industries, focusing mostly on real estate developers, asking explanations for their expenses during the 2017-18 fiscal year. GST officials believe that this scrutiny is the result of a lack of a reliable mechanism to track suppliers' GST compliance at the time.

That year, residential real estate was subject to a 12% GST rate, providing developers the option to apply for an Input Tax Credit (ITC). Developers may have manipulated the system by obtaining phony invoices in order to increase their costs, but there is no way to verify suppliers' GST compliance.

According to a senior official in the state's GST department who spoke on the record on the condition of anonymity, about 20,000 letters were sent to taxpayers in Gujarat whose tax returns were being reviewed. This project was launched as the deadline for issuing notices for fiscal year 2017-18 approached.

According to Section 73 of the GST Act, a large majority of these correspondences were directed at builders and covered both the 2017-18 and 2018-19 fiscal years. Our inquiry discovered that numerous developers had falsified supplier invoices in order to exaggerate their expenses. We have put in place robust monitoring mechanisms to detect such fraudulent transactions. Developers are given the option of either offering a defense or not for these transactions or remitting the applicable tax charges.

Chartered Accountant Karim Lakhani provided context, elucidating that, “At the outset, the GST rate for residential real estate stood at 12%, enabling developers to transfer the Input Tax Credit (ITC) advantage to purchasers. Nevertheless, in 2019, the central government modified the GST rates to 1% for affordable housing and 5% for other types of residential properties. In the course of this transition, numerous ongoing projects were granted the flexibility to opt for either the previous or the updated tax frameworks, resulting in a convoluted tax scenario for developers.

The State GST department has sent about 20,000 notifications to a variety of taxpayers from various industries, focusing mostly on real estate developers, asking explanations for their expenses during the 2017-18 fiscal year. GST officials believe that this scrutiny is the result of a lack of a reliable mechanism to track suppliers' GST compliance at the time.That year, residential real estate was subject to a 12% GST rate, providing developers the option to apply for an Input Tax Credit (ITC). Developers may have manipulated the system by obtaining phony invoices in order to increase their costs, but there is no way to verify suppliers' GST compliance.According to a senior official in the state's GST department who spoke on the record on the condition of anonymity, about 20,000 letters were sent to taxpayers in Gujarat whose tax returns were being reviewed. This project was launched as the deadline for issuing notices for fiscal year 2017-18 approached.According to Section 73 of the GST Act, a large majority of these correspondences were directed at builders and covered both the 2017-18 and 2018-19 fiscal years. Our inquiry discovered that numerous developers had falsified supplier invoices in order to exaggerate their expenses. We have put in place robust monitoring mechanisms to detect such fraudulent transactions. Developers are given the option of either offering a defense or not for these transactions or remitting the applicable tax charges.Chartered Accountant Karim Lakhani provided context, elucidating that, “At the outset, the GST rate for residential real estate stood at 12%, enabling developers to transfer the Input Tax Credit (ITC) advantage to purchasers. Nevertheless, in 2019, the central government modified the GST rates to 1% for affordable housing and 5% for other types of residential properties. In the course of this transition, numerous ongoing projects were granted the flexibility to opt for either the previous or the updated tax frameworks, resulting in a convoluted tax scenario for developers.

Next Story
Building Material

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Next Story
Technology

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?