Maharashtra seeks enhanced power for Sub-Registrars

28 Aug 2023 CW Team

A property registration department official explained, "A new Section 18 (a) is being introduced in the existing act to empower sub-registrars to reject the registration of specific documents related to transactions that contravene either central or state regulations." This announcement was made on Saturday.

Furthermore, there is a proposal to revise Section 21 of the Registration Act. This amendment seeks to authorise the state government to establish the necessary regulations for accurately describing the property in registration documents.

These amendments are prompted by instances of breaches in the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Act of 2016 and the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act of 1947, which were detected in certain property documents registered over the past two years. In response, the registration department has instructed all its offices to meticulously review documents for such violations over the preceding two years.

However, amending the act is a protracted procedure. The state has initiated this process, having received approval from the state assembly on July 25 and subsequently from the state council on August 3. The amendments now await the governor's endorsement. Once obtained, the bill will be forwarded to the Union government and the President for final approval. This is because the Registration Act of 1908 falls under central jurisdiction, as highlighted by officials from the registration department.

It's important to note that these amendments exclusively pertain to the state of Maharashtra, as affirmed by another official. Notably, senior officials have pointed out that certain prohibitive provisions concerning property transfers outlined in both state and central legislations need to be adhered to by registration officers. This requirement was previously based on Rule 44 (i) of the registration rules, but this rule was invalidated by the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court. Thus, the state is proposing adjustments to the sections within the Registration Act of 1908.

However, there are opposing voices. The Avdhoot Law Foundation in the state has raised concerns about granting excessive powers to sub-registrars due to the fear of potential corruption. Shrikant Joshi from the foundation expressed, "These powers might be susceptible to misuse by sub-registrars who may lack the qualifications to properly assess such documents."

Notably, the foundation has communicated its reservations to the President, highlighting that the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has already twice ruled against the state government, invalidating both the circular pertaining to Rule 44 (i) issued by the office and the rule itself. Presently, the matter is pending before the Supreme Court.

"Join industry leaders at RAHSTA Expo, India's premier platform for roads, highways and traffic infrastructure. Register now to explore innovations, network with experts and shape the future of mobility."

The state government has introduced proposed amendments to the Registration Act of 1908, aiming to grant greater authority to sub-registrars in scrutinising documents during the registration process to identify any potential violations of central or state laws.A property registration department official explained, A new Section 18 (a) is being introduced in the existing act to empower sub-registrars to reject the registration of specific documents related to transactions that contravene either central or state regulations. This announcement was made on Saturday.Furthermore, there is a proposal to revise Section 21 of the Registration Act. This amendment seeks to authorise the state government to establish the necessary regulations for accurately describing the property in registration documents.These amendments are prompted by instances of breaches in the Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Act of 2016 and the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act of 1947, which were detected in certain property documents registered over the past two years. In response, the registration department has instructed all its offices to meticulously review documents for such violations over the preceding two years.However, amending the act is a protracted procedure. The state has initiated this process, having received approval from the state assembly on July 25 and subsequently from the state council on August 3. The amendments now await the governor's endorsement. Once obtained, the bill will be forwarded to the Union government and the President for final approval. This is because the Registration Act of 1908 falls under central jurisdiction, as highlighted by officials from the registration department.It's important to note that these amendments exclusively pertain to the state of Maharashtra, as affirmed by another official. Notably, senior officials have pointed out that certain prohibitive provisions concerning property transfers outlined in both state and central legislations need to be adhered to by registration officers. This requirement was previously based on Rule 44 (i) of the registration rules, but this rule was invalidated by the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court. Thus, the state is proposing adjustments to the sections within the Registration Act of 1908.However, there are opposing voices. The Avdhoot Law Foundation in the state has raised concerns about granting excessive powers to sub-registrars due to the fear of potential corruption. Shrikant Joshi from the foundation expressed, These powers might be susceptible to misuse by sub-registrars who may lack the qualifications to properly assess such documents.Notably, the foundation has communicated its reservations to the President, highlighting that the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court has already twice ruled against the state government, invalidating both the circular pertaining to Rule 44 (i) issued by the office and the rule itself. Presently, the matter is pending before the Supreme Court.

Infrastructure Urban

02 Jun 2026

VECV Sales Rise 7.8 Per Cent In May 2026

VE Commercial Vehicles recorded sales of 7,978 units in May 2026, compared to 7,401 units in May 2025, registering growth of 7.8 per cent. This included 7,789 units from the Eicher brand and 189 units from the Volvo brand.Eicher branded trucks and buses reported sales of 7,789 units during the month, up 7.3 per cent from 7,258 units a year earlier. In the domestic commercial vehicle market, Eicher sales rose 9.1 per cent to 7,375 units from 6,758 units in May 2025.Exports declined 17.2 per cent to 414 units from 500 units in the corresponding month last year. Volvo Trucks and Volvo Buses recor..

Infrastructure Urban

02 Jun 2026

Table Space Strengthens DESYN Leadership Team

Table Space has announced strategic leadership appointments within DESYN, its integrated Design and Build business, as it looks to strengthen operations across key enterprise and GCC markets in India. DESYN was launched as a strategic extension of Table Space’s workspace solutions portfolio to meet rising demand for agile, high-quality and rapidly deployable enterprise workspaces.Shruti Ookabhoy has joined DESYN as Executive Director and will lead the Design vertical, focusing on design capability, operational excellence and team development across markets. She brings over 22 years of experi..

Infrastructure Transport

02 Jun 2026

Concord Associate Bags Rs 2.79 Bn Kavach Order

Concord Control Systems said its associate company, Progota India, has received a Rs 2.79 bn domestic order from Indian Railways for the supply, installation, testing and commissioning of on-board Kavach 4.0 loco equipment.The order is scheduled for execution within 12 months and strengthens Concord’s role in India’s railway safety and signalling ecosystem. Kavach is India’s indigenous automatic train protection system, designed to improve operational safety by helping prevent signal passing at danger and reducing collision risks.Gaurav Lath, Joint Managing Director, Concord Control Syst..