SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations
Real Estate

SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law.

The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA.

Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA.

The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State.

The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid.

During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law.

The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament.

It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA.

Image Source


Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law. The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA. Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA. The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State. The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid. During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law. The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament. It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA. Image Source Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

Next Story
Resources

ULCCS Showcases Cooperative Model at UN Symposium

Uralungal Labour Contract Co-operative Society (ULCCS) showcased its community-led development model at the United Nations Headquarters in New York, where it participated as a panellist at the International Symposium on Cooperative Financial Institutions held on 28–29 May 2026.Jointly organised by the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UN DESA), the International Cooperative Banking Association (ICBA), and the International Cooperative Alliance (ICA), the symposium was held under the theme ‘Fuelling Inclusive and Equitable Growth’ and brought together policymakers,..

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Delhi Airport to Finalise 20-Year Master Plan

Delhi International Airport Ltd (DIAL) is finalising a 20-year master plan to guide long term infrastructure and operational development at Indira Gandhi International Airport, an official said. The operator expects the plan to reflect changes in the airline industry, shifts in the competitive landscape and evolving infrastructure requirements across terminals, airside and support services. The official said the document is likely to be ready in the next two to two-and-a-half months as the operator moves through planning stages. The plan will be prepared after consultations with airport users ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Aadhar Housing Finance Targets Rs 500 bn AUM By FY29

Aadhar Housing Finance has set a target to raise its asset under management to Rs 500 billion (bn) by the end of FY29, aiming to achieve this over the next three financial years through an 18-20 per cent loan growth trajectory. The firm focuses on the low-income segment with a ticket size of less than Rs 1.5 million (mn) and has relied on that segment to drive expansion. The company closed FY26 with an AUM of Rs 305.71 bn, reflecting the expansion in recent years, and it reported a net profit rise of 22 per cent to Rs 11.08 bn. Management indicated that gross non-performing assets stood at 1.0..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement