SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations
Real Estate

SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA).

The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law.

The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA.

Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA.

The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State.

The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid.

During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law.

The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament.

It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA.

Image Source


Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law. The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA. Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA. The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State. The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid. During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law. The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament. It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA. Image Source Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code