SC strikes down WB’s HIRA law on real estate regulations

05 May 2021 CW Team

The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law.

The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA.

Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA.

The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State.

The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid.

During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law.

The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament.

It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA.

Image Source

Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

The Supreme Court (SC) struck out West Bengal's law on regulating the real estate sector, stating it as unconstitutional as the State's statute encroached upon the Centre's Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act (RERA). The apex court noted that the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulatory Authority (WB HIRA) has failed to include valuable safeguards for the homebuyers. A bench of justices—DY Chandrachud and MR Shah—said the West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act (HIRA), 2017 is somewhat identical to the centre's RERA repugnant to Parliament's law. The judgement came on a plea of 'Forum For People's Collective Efforts', an umbrella homebuyers association, challenging the constitutional validity of West Bengal Housing Industry Regulation Act, 2017, which is more or less identical to the Centre's RERA. Pronouncing the verdict through video conferencing, Justice Chandrachud said that fundamental features of the WB HIRA overlap and is a word-to-word duplication of the centre's RERA. The bench, which passed a lengthy verdict on the issue, said that West Bengal’s HIRA touches upon entry six and seven of the concurrent list, which was occupied by the law passed by Parliament and set up a parallel regime in the State. The panel said that WB HIRA is directly in conflict with RERA, without any valuable safeguards for the home buyers, and that it is invoking powers under Article 142 to hold that registrations of properties done under the state law before its verdict will be valid. During the hearing of the petition, the top court wondered whether a state, in the name of cooperative federalism, enact legislation under the concurrent list to occupy the same subjects in which Parliament has enacted a law. The court observed that both centre's RERA and WB HIRA dealt with issues of providing reliefs to home buyers and promoting real estate sectors, but some of the provisions of the state's legislation were in direct conflict with the law passed by the Parliament. It had wondered why a state would have a similar law enacted when there is already a law passed by Parliament and said many provisions in WB HIRA are similar to the central government's RERA. Image Source Also read: Impacts of interpretations on RERA: A legal analysis

Infrastructure Transport

06 Feb 2026

Lucknow Metro East-West Corridor Consultancy Contract Awarded

The Uttar Pradesh Metro Rail Corporation has awarded the first construction-related consultancy contract for the Lucknow Metro East West Corridor to a joint venture of AYESA Ingenieria Arquitectura SAU and AYESA India Pvt Ltd. The firm was declared the lowest bidder for the Detailed Design Consultant contract for Lucknow Metro Line-2 under Phase 1B and the contract was recommended following the financial bid. The contract is valued at Rs 159.0 million (mn), covering design services for the corridor. Lucknow Metro Line-2 envisages the construction of an 11.165 kilometre corridor connecting Cha..

Infrastructure Urban

06 Feb 2026

Div Com Kashmir Urges Fast Tracking Of Jhelum Water Transport Project

The Divisional Commissioner of Kashmir has called for the fast-tracking of the Jhelum water transport project, urging district administrations and relevant agencies to accelerate planning and clearances. In a meeting convened at the divisional headquarters, the commissioner instructed officials from irrigation, public health engineering and municipal departments to prioritise the project and coordinate survey and design work. The directive emphasised removal of administrative bottlenecks and close monitoring to ensure timely mobilisation of resources and contractors. Officials were told to in..

Infrastructure Urban

06 Feb 2026

Interarch Reports Strong Q3 And Nine Month Results

Interarch Building Solutions Limited reported unaudited results for the third quarter and nine months ended 31 December 2025, recording strong revenue growth driven by execution and a robust order book. Net revenue for the third quarter rose by 43.7 per cent to Rs 5.225 billion (bn), compared with Rs 3.636 bn a year earlier, reflecting heightened demand in pre-engineered building projects. The company’s total order book as at 31 January 2026 stood at Rs 16.85 bn, supporting near-term visibility. EBITDA excluding other income for the quarter increased by 43.2 per cent to Rs 503 million (mn),..