Supreme Court Criticises RERA’s Performance
Real Estate

Supreme Court Criticises RERA’s Performance

The Supreme Court on March 4, 2025, called the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) “disappointing,” noting its failure to adequately protect homebuyers' investments and promote the real estate sector. 
This observation came from a Bench led by Justice Surya Kant, following a submission by senior advocate K. Parameshwar about the “domino effect” in the real estate sector — where the failure of one project often triggers the collapse of others across states. Parameshwar urged for a stronger regulatory mechanism within the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016 to curb this trend, which severely impacts both homebuyers and developers. 
Justice Kant acknowledged the issue but also pointed out that establishing a stricter regulatory body might face objections from states on federalism grounds. 
This isn’t the first time the court has criticised RERA’s performance. In September 2024, the Supreme Court described RERA as a “rehabilitation centre for former bureaucrats,” accusing it of undermining the Act’s purpose. 
RERA was created under the 2016 Act to regulate and promote the real estate sector, ensuring transparent and efficient sales of plots, apartments, and projects while safeguarding consumer interests. It also established a dispute resolution mechanism and an Appellate Tribunal for handling appeals. 
(Mercom)      

The Supreme Court on March 4, 2025, called the functioning of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) “disappointing,” noting its failure to adequately protect homebuyers' investments and promote the real estate sector. This observation came from a Bench led by Justice Surya Kant, following a submission by senior advocate K. Parameshwar about the “domino effect” in the real estate sector — where the failure of one project often triggers the collapse of others across states. Parameshwar urged for a stronger regulatory mechanism within the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act of 2016 to curb this trend, which severely impacts both homebuyers and developers. Justice Kant acknowledged the issue but also pointed out that establishing a stricter regulatory body might face objections from states on federalism grounds. This isn’t the first time the court has criticised RERA’s performance. In September 2024, the Supreme Court described RERA as a “rehabilitation centre for former bureaucrats,” accusing it of undermining the Act’s purpose. RERA was created under the 2016 Act to regulate and promote the real estate sector, ensuring transparent and efficient sales of plots, apartments, and projects while safeguarding consumer interests. It also established a dispute resolution mechanism and an Appellate Tribunal for handling appeals. (Mercom)      

Next Story
Equipment

Handling concrete better

Efficiently handling the transportation and placement of concrete is essential to help maintain the quality of construction, meet project timelines by minimising downtimes, and reduce costs – by 5 to 15 per cent, according to Sandeep Jain, Director, Arkade Developers. CW explores what the efficient handling of concrete entails.Select wellFirst, a word on choosing the right equipment, such as a mixer with a capacity aligned to the volume required onsite, from Vaibhav Kulkarni, Concrete Expert. “An overly large mixer will increase the idle time (and cost), while one that ..

Next Story
Real Estate

Elevated floors!

Raised access flooring, also called false flooring, is a less common interiors feature than false ceilings, but it has as many uses – if not more.A raised floor is a modular panel installed above the structural floor. The space beneath the raised flooring is typically used to accommodate utilities such as electrical cables, plumbing and HVAC systems. And so, raised flooring is usually associated with buildings with heavy cabling and precise air distribution needs, such as data centres.That said, CW interacted with designers and architects and discovered that false flooring can come in handy ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

The Variation Challenge

A variation or change in scope clause is defined in construction contracts to take care of situations arising from change in the defined scope of work. Such changes may arise due to factors such as additions or deletions in the scope of work, modifications in the type, grade or specifications of materials, alterations in specifications or drawings, and acts or omissions of other contractors. Further, ineffective planning, inadequate investigations or surveys and requests from the employer or those within the project’s area of influence can contribute to changes in the scope of work. Ext..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?