What is strategic about disinvestment?
ECONOMY & POLICY

What is strategic about disinvestment?

It worries him when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors” for the newly cleared disinvestment policy, Pratap Padode says.

_____________

The top 10 profit-making public-sector enterprises (PSEs) (See Table 1) made an aggregate net profit of Rs 1.8 trillion during 2018-19. The other 168 profit-making PSEs made an aggregate total net profit of Rs 66.64 billion. So, 62% of the profits came from just 10 PSEs from the 178 profit making enterprises.

No surprises there to also learn that all 10 of them are from the energy sector). Of the 70 loss-making PSEs, just 10 of them contributed 94% of the total losses of Rs 31.64 billion (See Table 2). The balance 60 contributed a loss of Rs 1.89 billion.

Total investment in the PSEs contributed during 2018-19 was Rs 2.09 trillion. It is amply clear that mining and exploration businesses or the energy related businesses gave a return of 19.98% while the aggregate return from all sectors was 12.11% during 2018-19.

The disinvestment policy that received clearance recently has identified a list of strategic sectors requiring presence of PSEs in public interest where at least one enterprise will remain in the public sector, but private sector will also be allowed. The disinvestment targets for the current year 2020-21 seem to be way off the realisation (See Table 3).

Given the market conditions, with BSE volumes touching trades equivalent to $2.7 trillion and Sensex swinging around kissing distance of 50,000 while it tottered at 29,468 last year during March 2020, divestment needs to take a more proactive role in shoring finances for COVD hit fiscal deficit. Around 2003, during the Economic Editors’ conference I asked the then Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, “If the job of the Government is to provide an enabling environment for business and commerce to flourish and not be in the business of business, how does the decision of holding onto ITDC Hotels make sense for the government?” Sinha was a tad annoyed and retorted that the government can remain in businesses that it can contribute to. Since then, ITDC has been shedding hotels and its divestment plan now is in a firmer position.

So, when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors”, I am worried.

Image source

Also read: BPCL divestment bidding to become competitive

Read more here

Author: Pratap Padode is Editor-in-Chief, Construction World, & Founder, FIRST Construction Council.

____________________________________________

4th Indian Cement Review Conference 2021

17-18 March 

Click for event info


Make in Steel 2021

24 February 

Click for event info

It worries him when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors” for the newly cleared disinvestment policy, Pratap Padode says. _____________The top 10 profit-making public-sector enterprises (PSEs) (See Table 1) made an aggregate net profit of Rs 1.8 trillion during 2018-19. The other 168 profit-making PSEs made an aggregate total net profit of Rs 66.64 billion. So, 62% of the profits came from just 10 PSEs from the 178 profit making enterprises. No surprises there to also learn that all 10 of them are from the energy sector). Of the 70 loss-making PSEs, just 10 of them contributed 94% of the total losses of Rs 31.64 billion (See Table 2). The balance 60 contributed a loss of Rs 1.89 billion. Total investment in the PSEs contributed during 2018-19 was Rs 2.09 trillion. It is amply clear that mining and exploration businesses or the energy related businesses gave a return of 19.98% while the aggregate return from all sectors was 12.11% during 2018-19. The disinvestment policy that received clearance recently has identified a list of strategic sectors requiring presence of PSEs in public interest where at least one enterprise will remain in the public sector, but private sector will also be allowed. The disinvestment targets for the current year 2020-21 seem to be way off the realisation (See Table 3). Given the market conditions, with BSE volumes touching trades equivalent to $2.7 trillion and Sensex swinging around kissing distance of 50,000 while it tottered at 29,468 last year during March 2020, divestment needs to take a more proactive role in shoring finances for COVD hit fiscal deficit. Around 2003, during the Economic Editors’ conference I asked the then Finance Minister Yashwant Sinha, “If the job of the Government is to provide an enabling environment for business and commerce to flourish and not be in the business of business, how does the decision of holding onto ITDC Hotels make sense for the government?” Sinha was a tad annoyed and retorted that the government can remain in businesses that it can contribute to. Since then, ITDC has been shedding hotels and its divestment plan now is in a firmer position. So, when the government decides to identify a list of “strategic sectors”, I am worried.Image sourceAlso read: BPCL divestment bidding to become competitiveRead more hereAuthor: Pratap Padode is Editor-in-Chief, Construction World, & Founder, FIRST Construction Council.____________________________________________4th Indian Cement Review Conference 202117-18 March Click for event infoMake in Steel 202124 February Click for event info

Next Story
Infrastructure Transport

Vikaspuri Road Upgrade, Tree Drive to Boost Delhi Constituency

Delhi’s Health and Transport Minister Pankaj Kumar Singh has broken ground on the long-awaited Baprola Village–Harphool Vihar road while leading a record plantation of 501 saplings under the “Ek Ped Maa Ke Naam” campaign. He said the two initiatives reflect the capital’s “people-centric governance”, promising safer, faster and more dignified daily life for residents.The rebuilt thoroughfare will ease commutes for Baprola Village, G-2 Jai Vihar, Prashant Enclave, Bajrang Chowk and Harphool Vihar, directly benefiting an estimated three thousand to three thousand five hundred school..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

Centre Drops Greenfield Cities Plan, Redirects Rs 80 Bn

The Union government has quietly shelved the Fifteenth Finance Commission’s proposal to incubate eight new greenfield cities, reallocating the Rs 80 billion set aside for the venture to a forthcoming urban-development scheme. According to senior officials at the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs (MoHUA), the new initiative is being shaped in consultation with NITI Aayog and the Asian Development Bank to bolster infrastructure in towns with populations below one lakh.The decision, taken at the behest of the Prime Minister’s Office, follows presentations for the government’s 100-day ag..

Next Story
Real Estate

Odisha To Review Twin-City Project Road Approvals

The Odisha Government will scrutinise all approach-road permissions issued to real-estate schemes in Bhubaneswar and Cuttack over the past five years, following a controversy that led to a project’s registration being revoked for citing railway land as its sole access.Housing and Urban Development Minister Krushna Chandra Mahapatra has asked officials of the Bhubaneswar Development Authority, Bhubaneswar Municipal Corporation, Cuttack Development Authority and Cuttack Municipal Corporation to submit full records for every scheme cleared since 2020. Details sought include the building-plan ap..

Advertisement

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?