DST Clarifies Media Reports on State Science Policy Responses
ECONOMY & POLICY

DST Clarifies Media Reports on State Science Policy Responses

The Department of Science and Technology (DST) has issued a clarification concerning recent media reports alleging a contradiction in its responses to Parliamentary questions regarding the first Indian state to implement a science policy. The department emphasised that the two queries raised in 2022 and 2025 differed in both scope and intent, and that the replies provided were accurate and aligned with the specific questions posed.

In response to a Parliamentary Question dated 21 July 2022, which sought to ascertain whether any state government had ever initiated a science policy since India’s independence, the DST cited Gujarat’s Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy of 2018. This response did not claim Gujarat as the first state chronologically but served as a representative example, which was consistent with the wording and requirements of the original query.

By contrast, a Parliamentary Question answered on 13 March 2025 sought details of all states that had implemented science policies and specifically asked which was the first to do so post-independence. In reply, the DST provided a detailed list of states and their respective policy years:

Kerala (1974 & 2002) Gujarat (2018) Himachal Pradesh (2021) Madhya Pradesh (2022)

DST further clarified that Kerala was the first state to implement a science policy in 1974, thus directly and factually addressing the revised scope of the 2025 question.

The department underlined that no contradiction exists between the two responses. The apparent disparity stems from the differing context and phrasing of the questions raised in Parliament. The DST reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, factual accuracy, and accountability in all official communications and responses, especially in the context of Parliamentary proceedings

The Department of Science and Technology (DST) has issued a clarification concerning recent media reports alleging a contradiction in its responses to Parliamentary questions regarding the first Indian state to implement a science policy. The department emphasised that the two queries raised in 2022 and 2025 differed in both scope and intent, and that the replies provided were accurate and aligned with the specific questions posed. In response to a Parliamentary Question dated 21 July 2022, which sought to ascertain whether any state government had ever initiated a science policy since India’s independence, the DST cited Gujarat’s Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) Policy of 2018. This response did not claim Gujarat as the first state chronologically but served as a representative example, which was consistent with the wording and requirements of the original query. By contrast, a Parliamentary Question answered on 13 March 2025 sought details of all states that had implemented science policies and specifically asked which was the first to do so post-independence. In reply, the DST provided a detailed list of states and their respective policy years: Kerala (1974 & 2002) Gujarat (2018) Himachal Pradesh (2021) Madhya Pradesh (2022) DST further clarified that Kerala was the first state to implement a science policy in 1974, thus directly and factually addressing the revised scope of the 2025 question. The department underlined that no contradiction exists between the two responses. The apparent disparity stems from the differing context and phrasing of the questions raised in Parliament. The DST reaffirmed its commitment to transparency, factual accuracy, and accountability in all official communications and responses, especially in the context of Parliamentary proceedings

Related Stories

Gold Stories

Next Story
Resources

Schindler named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026

Schindler has been named among Forbes’ World’s Best Employers 2026, a global ranking recognising companies for their workplace environments.Compiled by Forbes in partnership with Statista, the ranking is based on independent employee feedback, including whether employees would recommend their organisation to friends and family.The company said the recognition reflected its focus on creating a workplace where employees can develop their expertise and build careers. ..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

India needs an export-execution mindset: Vishesh Jain

Interview with Vishesh Jain, Founder & CEO, EximpleWhat gaps in India’s global trade ecosystem led you to build Eximple, and what problem did you see businesses struggling with most?Eximple came out of a problem that all three founders had seen from different choke points in the trade ecosystem. India has millions of MSMEs and manufacturers, and many of them can make products that are genuinely competitive on quality. Yet only a small fraction is able to build meaningful international businesses. In our experience, the gap is usually not manufacturing capability; it is the ability to exe..

Next Story
Building Material

Nuvoco reports 13.5% revenue growth in Q2 FY27

Nuvoco Vistas Corp. Ltd. reported consolidated revenue of Rs 27.9 billion for Q2 FY27, up 13.5% year on year. Cement sales volume rose 9% to 4.7 million tonnes (MMT), while EBITDA increased 11% to Rs 4.11 billion.The company said it began its cement operations in 2014 with a 2.3 MMT per annum (MMTPA) operation at Nimbol. It now aims to reach 35 MMTPA of cement capacity by FY28, nearly 15 times its initial capacity. Its portfolio spans cement, ready-mix concrete and modern building materials.On sustainability and cost efficiency, Nuvoco partnered with CleanMax for a 46.4 MW wind-solar hybrid re..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

SPECIAL OFFER
QR Code