GST Authorities Issue Notices to Developers Over Rs 35 Billion Claims
ECONOMY & POLICY

GST Authorities Issue Notices to Developers Over Rs 35 Billion Claims

Several property developers have reportedly received show-cause notices from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities, questioning their claims for input tax credit (ITC) amounting to approximately Rs 35 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter.

These notices follow a Supreme Court ruling in October regarding Safari Retreats, which allowed commercial real estate companies to claim ITC on construction costs for rental buildings.

The GST authorities have sought the refund of ITC from the developers, arguing that the credits were wrongly claimed, and in some cases, they have blocked the credit claims altogether. A developer who received a notice mentioned that the notices were causing significant confusion among industry players.

The Supreme Court had upheld the constitutional validity of the relevant provisions while emphasizing that eligibility for ITC should be determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the "essentiality" and "functionality" tests. The Court also specified that two conditions must be met to avail tax credit: the property must either be leased out or sold before construction is complete, and it must qualify as "plant or machinery."

Authorities stated that credits claimed by real estate companies would be deemed eligible once it is conclusively established that they meet the functionality and essentiality tests outlined by the Supreme Court.

Many developers have already approached the court in response to these notices, claiming that tax officials are misusing the provision to block and deny ITC. Tax officials explained that they are carefully reviewing ITC claims to prevent potential misuse. Abhishek A. Rastogi, the founder of Rastogi Chambers, argued that a scientific and objective mechanism must be applied uniformly to determine eligibility, in order to avoid unjustly denying rightful credits.

He also pointed out that in certain cases, authorities are interpreting the Supreme Court's findings as applying only to the petitioners in the Safari Retreats case. He stated that this interpretation is flawed, as judicial precedents are binding and should be applied uniformly to all taxpayers in similar situations across the industry.

Several property developers have reportedly received show-cause notices from the Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities, questioning their claims for input tax credit (ITC) amounting to approximately Rs 35 billion, according to sources familiar with the matter. These notices follow a Supreme Court ruling in October regarding Safari Retreats, which allowed commercial real estate companies to claim ITC on construction costs for rental buildings. The GST authorities have sought the refund of ITC from the developers, arguing that the credits were wrongly claimed, and in some cases, they have blocked the credit claims altogether. A developer who received a notice mentioned that the notices were causing significant confusion among industry players. The Supreme Court had upheld the constitutional validity of the relevant provisions while emphasizing that eligibility for ITC should be determined on a case-by-case basis, based on the essentiality and functionality tests. The Court also specified that two conditions must be met to avail tax credit: the property must either be leased out or sold before construction is complete, and it must qualify as plant or machinery. Authorities stated that credits claimed by real estate companies would be deemed eligible once it is conclusively established that they meet the functionality and essentiality tests outlined by the Supreme Court. Many developers have already approached the court in response to these notices, claiming that tax officials are misusing the provision to block and deny ITC. Tax officials explained that they are carefully reviewing ITC claims to prevent potential misuse. Abhishek A. Rastogi, the founder of Rastogi Chambers, argued that a scientific and objective mechanism must be applied uniformly to determine eligibility, in order to avoid unjustly denying rightful credits. He also pointed out that in certain cases, authorities are interpreting the Supreme Court's findings as applying only to the petitioners in the Safari Retreats case. He stated that this interpretation is flawed, as judicial precedents are binding and should be applied uniformly to all taxpayers in similar situations across the industry.

Next Story
Building Material

Ambuja Cements Drags JSW Cement to Court Over ‘Kawach’ Brand

Ambuja Cements, part of the Adani Group, has filed a trademark infringement case against JSW Cement in the Delhi High Court, alleging that its rival copied the ‘Kawach’ brand with its new product ‘Jal Kavach’.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora issued summons to JSW Cement and its subsidiary, JSW IP Holdings Pvt Ltd, while referring the matter to mediation. Hearings are scheduled to resume on October 15 if no settlement is reached.Ambuja, which registered the ‘Kawach’ trademark in 2019, argues that the term ‘Kavach’—meaning shield—is the distinctive feature of its branding. ..

Next Story
Technology

Bentley Systems Named Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 by Afcons

Bentley Systems, the infrastructure engineering software company, has been recognised by Afcons Infrastructure Limited as its Innovation Partner of the Year 2025 at the Innovation Partners 2025 Felicitation Ceremony in Mumbai. The award acknowledges Bentley’s contribution to Afcons’ engineering digitalisation journey through an enterprise agreement providing access to over 250 Bentley engineering software tools. This adoption has enabled Afcons to accelerate project delivery, standardise digital workflows, and strengthen innovation across its infrastructure portfolio. Among key i..

Next Story
Infrastructure Urban

SBI Sells 13.18% Stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s SMBC

State Bank of India (SBI) has completed the sale of a 13.18 per cent stake in Yes Bank to Japan’s Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation (SMBC) for over Rs 8,889 crore. The divestment is part of a Rs 13,482 crore deal finalised in May with SMBC and seven private banks.Following the transaction, SBI’s shareholding in Yes Bank stands at 10.8 per cent. The deal, involving 4,134.4 million shares at Rs 21.50 each, is the largest cross-border transaction in the Indian banking sector.SBI Chairman C S Setty described the 2020 RBI-led rescue of Yes Bank as a pioneering public-private partnership, addi..

Advertisement

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Get daily newsletters around different themes from Construction world.

STAY CONNECTED

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Talk to us?